John Schilling
12-19-2007, 09:33 PM
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:32:17 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca>
wrote:
>On Dec 18, 6:16 pm, archm...@sfchat.org (Nate Edel) wrote:
>> Quadibloc <jsav...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>> > On Dec 18, 2:04 am, archm...@sfchat.org (Nate Edel) wrote:
>> > > Dorothy J Heydt <djhe...@kithrup.com> wrote:
>
>> > > > I'll take your word for it. Her Galadriel stunk.
>
>> > > Yes, but I'm not sure there's any other mere mortal who could have done it
>> > > better... especially one who was alive and sufficiently youthful for the
>> > > part when the movies were actually shot.
>
>> > Which mere mortals at earlier junctions along the causeways of Time
>> > might have had a shot at doing so demanding a part as Galadriel
>> > decently, then?
>
>> I'm not saying there was one, just that I'm a lot more familiar with the
>> current crop.
>
>> Done long enough ago, though, Audrey Hepburn or Veronica Lake would have
>> each been an interesting choice for Arwen. I personally found Liv Tyler a
>> more jarring mismatch for that part than Cate Blanchett was for Galadriel.
>
>I was worried you might have been thinking of Katharine Hepburn.
Well, if Cate Blanchett can play Galadriel and Cate Blanchett can play
Katherine Hepburn...
Both of which roles I think she did passably well, and nobody could have
done more than passably well.
--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
*John.Schilling@alumni.usc.edu * for success" *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *
wrote:
>On Dec 18, 6:16 pm, archm...@sfchat.org (Nate Edel) wrote:
>> Quadibloc <jsav...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>> > On Dec 18, 2:04 am, archm...@sfchat.org (Nate Edel) wrote:
>> > > Dorothy J Heydt <djhe...@kithrup.com> wrote:
>
>> > > > I'll take your word for it. Her Galadriel stunk.
>
>> > > Yes, but I'm not sure there's any other mere mortal who could have done it
>> > > better... especially one who was alive and sufficiently youthful for the
>> > > part when the movies were actually shot.
>
>> > Which mere mortals at earlier junctions along the causeways of Time
>> > might have had a shot at doing so demanding a part as Galadriel
>> > decently, then?
>
>> I'm not saying there was one, just that I'm a lot more familiar with the
>> current crop.
>
>> Done long enough ago, though, Audrey Hepburn or Veronica Lake would have
>> each been an interesting choice for Arwen. I personally found Liv Tyler a
>> more jarring mismatch for that part than Cate Blanchett was for Galadriel.
>
>I was worried you might have been thinking of Katharine Hepburn.
Well, if Cate Blanchett can play Galadriel and Cate Blanchett can play
Katherine Hepburn...
Both of which roles I think she did passably well, and nobody could have
done more than passably well.
--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
*John.Schilling@alumni.usc.edu * for success" *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *