John Schilling
12-19-2007, 09:33 PM
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:28:42 +0100, Jasper Janssen <jasper@jjanssen.org>
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:03:29 -0800, John Schilling
><schillin@spock.usc.edu> wrote:
>>On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:18:00 +0100, Jasper Janssen <jasper@jjanssen.org>
>>wrote:
>
>>>Something that crossed my mind: For the Big Mac Price Index, what actually
>>>matters is not the existence of a Mc in the country, but the existence of
>>>one in the currency area. Many smaller countries (including Vatican City)
>>>don't have a currency (that's actually used) of their own (Luxembourg, San
>>>Marino, Liechtenstein, Vatican City, Andorra, Monaco in Europe, and
>>>there's a currency unity through much of formerly-french west-africa,
>>>etc).
>>Except that currency unity doesn't necessarily mean economic unity, at
>>least at the consumer-price level. Your examples were cherrypicked to
>>that end,
>My examples weren't cherrypicked at all, they're the entire row of EU
>microstates.
OK, then, parochial rather than cherrypicked. The EU does not represent
a broad enough range of economic possibility to be really useful for this
sort of thing - you have to look beyond for most of the interesting cases.
Especially the post-Euro EU.
There aren't that many countries that almost literally have
>> but at the other extreme do we really expect a Big Mac in
>>Fairbanks, Alaska to cost the same as a CONUS Big Mac just because
>>both are paid for in US dollars?
>Well, yes, actually. McDonald's prices vary within the USA?
Yes, of course. A franchise in Fairbanks would go broke trying to
match CONUS prices while paying the extra costs of e.g. shipping
supplies to the *** end of nowhere. Or, if the national chain
set prices high enough that a Fairbanks franchise could break
even, the CONUS franchises would be making enormous profits for
the few months it took their ompetitors to realize how easily
they could undersell the golden arches and capture the local market.
>>So, consumer economy, not currency area.
>It's generally close enough.
In Europe, perhaps. Even the US alone is big enough for that model
to fail.
--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
*John.Schilling@alumni.usc.edu * for success" *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:03:29 -0800, John Schilling
><schillin@spock.usc.edu> wrote:
>>On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:18:00 +0100, Jasper Janssen <jasper@jjanssen.org>
>>wrote:
>
>>>Something that crossed my mind: For the Big Mac Price Index, what actually
>>>matters is not the existence of a Mc in the country, but the existence of
>>>one in the currency area. Many smaller countries (including Vatican City)
>>>don't have a currency (that's actually used) of their own (Luxembourg, San
>>>Marino, Liechtenstein, Vatican City, Andorra, Monaco in Europe, and
>>>there's a currency unity through much of formerly-french west-africa,
>>>etc).
>>Except that currency unity doesn't necessarily mean economic unity, at
>>least at the consumer-price level. Your examples were cherrypicked to
>>that end,
>My examples weren't cherrypicked at all, they're the entire row of EU
>microstates.
OK, then, parochial rather than cherrypicked. The EU does not represent
a broad enough range of economic possibility to be really useful for this
sort of thing - you have to look beyond for most of the interesting cases.
Especially the post-Euro EU.
There aren't that many countries that almost literally have
>> but at the other extreme do we really expect a Big Mac in
>>Fairbanks, Alaska to cost the same as a CONUS Big Mac just because
>>both are paid for in US dollars?
>Well, yes, actually. McDonald's prices vary within the USA?
Yes, of course. A franchise in Fairbanks would go broke trying to
match CONUS prices while paying the extra costs of e.g. shipping
supplies to the *** end of nowhere. Or, if the national chain
set prices high enough that a Fairbanks franchise could break
even, the CONUS franchises would be making enormous profits for
the few months it took their ompetitors to realize how easily
they could undersell the golden arches and capture the local market.
>>So, consumer economy, not currency area.
>It's generally close enough.
In Europe, perhaps. Even the US alone is big enough for that model
to fail.
--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
*John.Schilling@alumni.usc.edu * for success" *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *