In article <2292db98-c5a7-4007-ab04-f69773c01009
@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_troy@yahoo.com says...
> (walks into confessional)
>
> "Father I have sinned."
> "What is your sin my son?"
> "I gazed upon an underage girl,

In what country?

> and I thought impure thoughts. Here
> is the photo."
> (pause)
> "Father are you there?
> "Yes my son. Truly God is an artist. A masterwork."
>
> http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/haydenpanettiere29/image-html/attachment.html

She's too flat.

In article
<d3f518dc-a3f0-4d16-bc23-49b5a4de1c11@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:
>
> > She's too flat.
>
> She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.

I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
than the cheerleader.

In article <d3f518dc-a3f0-4d16-bc23-49b5a4de1c11
@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
>
> > She's too flat.
>
> She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.
>
> http://www.egotastic.com/entertainment/celebrities/kristen-bell/kristen-bells-bikini-is-unforgettable-003082
>
> _That_ is flat. Men typically have bigger boobs than that. Hayden
> isn't flat.

Sure she is - you just like 'em that way *g*

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:55:06 +0100, Pete B wrote:

> In article <2292db98-c5a7-4007-ab04-f69773c01009
> @i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_troy@yahoo.com says...
>> (walks into confessional)
>>
>> "Father I have sinned."
>> "What is your sin my son?"
>> "I gazed upon an underage girl,
>
> In what country?
>
>> and I thought impure thoughts. Here
>> is the photo."
>> (pause)
>> "Father are you there?
>> "Yes my son. Truly God is an artist. A masterwork."
>>
>> http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/haydenpanettiere29/image-html/attachment.html
>
> She's too flat.

<cough>aggot<cough>
--
Customer Service Sign: Helen Waite is now in charge of all rush orders. If
you are in a hurry, just go to Helen Waite.

RocinanteREMOVETHIS@gmail.com
12/25/2007 12:21:16 PM

Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:

>>>She's too flat.

>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.

>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
>than the cheerleader.

She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?

In article <1ftx7jj6pmqdl.dat22eyn43m5.dlg@40tude.net>,
RocinanteREMOVETHIS@gmail.com says...

> >> http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/haydenpanettiere29/image-html/attachment.html
> >
> > She's too flat.
>
> <cough>aggot<cough>

You failed to make a point, if there is one, perhaps you could explain
in greater detail?

In article <47713f25$0$47110$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreene ws.net>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:
>
> >>>She's too flat.
>
> >>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.
>
> >I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
> >than the cheerleader.
>
> She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?

Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.

Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:

>>>>>She's too flat.

>>>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.

>>>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
>>>than the cheerleader.

>>She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?

>Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.

The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.

In article <477196f2$0$47123$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreene ws.net>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>She's too flat.
>
> >>>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.
>
> >>>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
> >>>than the cheerleader.
>
> >>She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?
>
> >Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.
>
> The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
> a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.

I've known teenagers, both female and male, who were exceptionally
bright and I've known people in their 20's and 30's who were idiots.

My point stands. You'd do better linking attractiveness to intelligence
rather than age.

Thanatos wrote:
> In article <477196f2$0$47123$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreene ws.net>,
> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>> Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> She's too flat.
>>>>>> She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.
>>>>> I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
>>>>> than the cheerleader.
>>>> She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?
>>> Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.
>> The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
>> a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.
>
> I've known teenagers, both female and male, who were exceptionally
> bright and I've known people in their 20's and 30's who were idiots.
>
> My point stands. You'd do better linking attractiveness to intelligence
> rather than age.


You're going to have to come up with a better argument for statuatory
rape than that. Hey, maybe Nickelodeon can use that as a quote for the
show they do about Jamie Lynn's pregnancy!

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:11:41 +0100, Pete B wrote:

> In article <1ftx7jj6pmqdl.dat22eyn43m5.dlg@40tude.net>,
> RocinanteREMOVETHIS@gmail.com says...
>
>>>> http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/haydenpanettiere29/image-html/attachment.html
>>>
>>> She's too flat.
>>
>> <cough>aggot<cough>
>
> You failed to make a point, if there is one, perhaps you could explain
> in greater detail?

Yes, you know the old school trick where you cough out an insult in order
to hide it from the teacher?

--
Customer Service Sign: Helen Waite is now in charge of all rush orders. If
you are in a hurry, just go to Helen Waite.

RocinanteREMOVETHIS@gmail.com
12/26/2007 12:11:07 AM

Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>She's too flat.

>>>>>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.

>>>>>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
>>>>>than the cheerleader.

>>>>She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?

>>>Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.

>>The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
>>a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.

>I've known teenagers, both female and male, who were exceptionally
>bright and I've known people in their 20's and 30's who were idiots.

Great! What does that have to do with having things in common in a
romantic setting?

>My point stands. You'd do better linking attractiveness to intelligence
>rather than age.

I swore off teenage girls decades ago. Once one is no longer a teenager,
it's time to move on and grow up.

In article <1bgpm4ecnjfb1.167v770nuzq2t.dlg@40tude.net>,
RocinanteREMOVETHIS@gmail.com says...
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:11:41 +0100, Pete B wrote:
>
> > In article <1ftx7jj6pmqdl.dat22eyn43m5.dlg@40tude.net>,
> > RocinanteREMOVETHIS@gmail.com says...
> >
> >>>> http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/haydenpanettiere29/image-html/attachment.html
> >>>
> >>> She's too flat.
> >>
> >> <cough>aggot<cough>
> >
> > You failed to make a point, if there is one, perhaps you could explain
> > in greater detail?
>
> Yes, you know the old school trick where you cough out an insult in order
> to hide it from the teacher?

Sure, but you still didn't make a point, unless it was that all men who
do not want to have sex with flatchested young girls with bodies like
boys must be homosexuals - which doesn't really make sense.

In article <atropos-E37496.22161825122007@news.giganews.com>,
atropos@mac.com says...
> In article <477196f2$0$47123$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreene ws.net>,
> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > >"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> > >>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > >>>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>She's too flat.
> >
> > >>>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.
> >
> > >>>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
> > >>>than the cheerleader.
> >
> > >>She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?
> >
> > >Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.
> >
> > The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
> > a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.
>
> I've known teenagers, both female and male, who were exceptionally
> bright and I've known people in their 20's and 30's who were idiots.
>
> My point stands. You'd do better linking attractiveness to intelligence
> rather than age.

If you do you have a better chance of scoring someone attractive in your
old age ;)

In article <35f9b3c3-0cd1-45cc-a881-
73b02f76fc6b@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
says...

> > Sure she is - you just like 'em that way *g*
>
> I'll give Heroes credit for consistently casting some of the best
> looking women on TV today and then making good use of them. Take
> Kristen Bell: she became popular after appearing as a FMP temptress
> with a ever so innocent "Don't you want me?" side on Smallville but
> then her Veronica Mars character was a boring *****. Casting her as
> an electroshock torturer/temptress on Heroes was a stroke of genius.
> It doesn't change the fact, however, that she is flat as a board next
> to Hayden, however. Granted, Hayden doesn't have tits the size of
> watermelons. Is that how _you_ like 'em? :)

Well visible would be nice ;)

In article <4771f8ed$0$47112$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreene ws.net>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>She's too flat.
>
> >>>>>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.
>
> >>>>>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
> >>>>>than the cheerleader.
>
> >>>>She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?
>
> >>>Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.
>
> >>The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
> >>a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.
>
> >I've known teenagers, both female and male, who were exceptionally
> >bright and I've known people in their 20's and 30's who were idiots.
>
> Great! What does that have to do with having things in common in a
> romantic setting?

And the goal posts have now moved again.

> > My point stands. You'd do better linking attractiveness
> > to intelligence rather than age.

> I swore off teenage girls decades ago. Once one is no longer
> a teenager, it's time to move on and grow up.

Who said anything about dating them. One can find a person attractive
without actually acting on it nor does it mean one hasn't "grown up" as
you seem to enjoy pejoratively putting it.

Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>She's too flat.

>>>>>>>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.

>>>>>>>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
>>>>>>>than the cheerleader.

>>>>>>She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?

>>>>>Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.

>>>>The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
>>>>a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.

>>>I've known teenagers, both female and male, who were exceptionally
>>>bright and I've known people in their 20's and 30's who were idiots.

>>Great! What does that have to do with having things in common in a
>>romantic setting?

>And the goal posts have now moved again.

No. I've simply made the mistake of assuming you had reached a level of
maturity, which you keep denying. There's more to attractiveness than
you believe. You want teenage girls? Your call; not for me.

In article <47728654$0$47150$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreene ws.net>,
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>On Dec 25, 8:55 pm, Pete B <xxxh@ xsomeething.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>She's too flat.
>
> >>>>>>>>She's the Rocky Mountains compared to Kristen Bell.
>
> >>>>>>>I'd still take Bell in a heartbeat. She's infinitely more attractive
> >>>>>>>than the cheerleader.
>
> >>>>>>She's also 11 years older. Perhaps you're maturing?
>
> >>>>>Perhaps you're myopically linking attractiveness or lack thereof to age.
>
> >>>>The attractiveness of a lengthy conversation with a teenage girl versus
> >>>>a woman in her late 20s... you better believe it.
>
> >>>I've known teenagers, both female and male, who were exceptionally
> >>>bright and I've known people in their 20's and 30's who were idiots.
>
> >>Great! What does that have to do with having things in common in a
> >>romantic setting?
>
> >And the goal posts have now moved again.
>
> No. I've simply made the mistake of assuming you had reached a level of
> maturity, which you keep denying.

I've done nothing of the sort. If you want to put words in other
people's mouths, at least make sure they're the right words.

> There's more to attractiveness than
> you believe.

Actually, that seems to be your failing, not mine.

> You want teenage girls?

Which, of course, I never said. Once again, a person can decide another
is attractive without "wanting" them.

Seems like, of the two of us, someone does need to grow up, and it's not
me.

In article <atropos-80B218.13353526122007@news.giganews.com>,
atropos@mac.com says...
> > No. I've simply made the mistake of assuming you had reached a level of
> > maturity, which you keep denying.
>
> I've done nothing of the sort. If you want to put words in other
> people's mouths, at least make sure they're the right words.
>

As long as its just words he puts there ;)

In article <MPG.21dcc14aecee5ab498b6e3@news.usenetserver.com>,
Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:

> In article <atropos-80B218.13353526122007@news.giganews.com>,
> atropos@mac.com says...
> > > No. I've simply made the mistake of assuming you had reached a level of
> > > maturity, which you keep denying.
> >
> > I've done nothing of the sort. If you want to put words in other
> > people's mouths, at least make sure they're the right words.
> >
>
> As long as its just words he puts there ;)

Eeew...

In article <MPG.21db1c1972576b98b6ca@news.usenetserver.com>,
xxxh@_xsomeething.com says...
> > http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/haydenpanettiere29/image-html/attachment.html
>
> She's too flat.

A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.
Take for example Natalie Portman, who is arguably one of the sexiest
young women on Earth and who would look ridiculous with great big boobs.

In article <MPG.21dcf607d5e1bfe69896b5@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
forge@killallspammers.youneedageek.com says...
> In article <MPG.21db1c1972576b98b6ca@news.usenetserver.com>,
> xxxh@_xsomeething.com says...
> > > http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/haydenpanettiere29/image-html/attachment.html
> >
> > She's too flat.
>
> A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.

Good for you.

In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
says...

> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
> pain they cause a woman's back.

The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
trained away.

> Seriously, Hayden's breasts are
> fine. Now that's she's eighteen she can show them to us in all their
> glory and put a swift end to this discussion, especially if she stood
> in profile for us. :)

Hm - so you like the look of your students? ;-)

Once Upon A Time,
Pete B wrote:

>> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>> pain they cause a woman's back.
>
>The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>trained away.

I'm willing to massage away any pain a big-boobed woman may experience as a
result of training. Where do I apply?


**
Captain Infinity

In article <g6f7n3h48qu2mobgj3etdff0ehqln2q2k2@4ax.com>,
Infinity@captaininfinity.us says...
> Once Upon A Time,
> Pete B wrote:
>
> >> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
> >> pain they cause a woman's back.
> >
> >The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
> >trained away.
>
> I'm willing to massage away any pain a big-boobed woman may experience as a
> result of training. Where do I apply?

Let us know if you find out :)

Captain Infinity wrote:
> Once Upon A Time,
> Pete B wrote:
>
>>> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>>> pain they cause a woman's back.
>> The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>> trained away.
>
> I'm willing to massage away any pain a big-boobed woman may experience as a
> result of training. Where do I apply?

The pain would be in the neck and shoulders Captain, not where you think
you'd like to massage...

Once Upon A Time,
suzee wrote:

>Captain Infinity wrote:
>> Once Upon A Time,
>> Pete B wrote:
>>
>>>> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>>>> pain they cause a woman's back.
>>> The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>>> trained away.
>>
>> I'm willing to massage away any pain a big-boobed woman may experience as a
>> result of training. Where do I apply?
>
>The pain would be in the neck and shoulders Captain, not where you think
>you'd like to massage...

I have experience in matters massage. Believe me, when the oil is warm and
relaxation sets in, these things never confine themselves to the neck and
shoulders.


**
Captain Infinity

"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21dd9f40af68e93198b6ed@news.usenetserver. com...
> In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
> b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
> says...
>
>> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>> pain they cause a woman's back.
>
> The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
> trained away.
>
And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the weight
they are meant to carry?
More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?

>> Seriously, Hayden's breasts are
>> fine. Now that's she's eighteen she can show them to us in all their
>> glory and put a swift end to this discussion, especially if she stood
>> in profile for us. :)
>
> Hm - so you like the look of your students? ;-)
>
If they are college students, what difference does it make? They're not
exactly children.

"Captain Infinity" <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote in message
news:g6f7n3h48qu2mobgj3etdff0ehqln2q2k2@4ax.com...
> Once Upon A Time,
> Pete B wrote:
>
>>> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>>> pain they cause a woman's back.
>>
>>The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>>trained away.
>
> I'm willing to massage away any pain a big-boobed woman may experience as
> a
> result of training. Where do I apply?

*LOL* Just remember, those muscles you're massaging are going to be in her
back.

In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
says...
> > A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.
> > Take for example Natalie Portman, who is arguably one of the sexiest
> > young women on Earth
>
> That would be Maggie Q.

Who pray tell is this Maggie Q person?

In article <MPG.21de1be6a5110b979896b6@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
Forge <forge@killallspammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:

> In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
> b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
> says...
> > > A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.
> > > Take for example Natalie Portman, who is arguably one of the sexiest
> > > young women on Earth
> >
> > That would be Maggie Q.
>
> Who pray tell is this Maggie Q person?

Someone I don't find very attractive, but is still way hotter than
Natalie Portman.

--
Jitterbug phones:
Fourth one is one the way. We'll see what happens. :\

In article <4mu7n3hc0f79rj95pcm5pvoqhrr8gvth17@4ax.com>,
Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> said:

> Once Upon A Time,
> suzee wrote:
>
>> The pain would be in the neck and shoulders Captain,
>> not where you think you'd like to massage...
>
> I have experience in matters massage.

And even more in matters pain in the neck.

--
William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com>

In article <13n8j2f4gkivc37@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
<dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>
> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.21dd9f40af68e93198b6ed@news.usenetserver. com...
> > In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
> > b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
> > says...
> >
> >> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
> >> pain they cause a woman's back.
> >
> > The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
> > trained away.
> >
> And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the weight
> they are meant to carry?

We are talking "mean to carry" - but people not being in the shape they
need to be. Anyway; I don't know the specific exercises.

> More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?

No, only an idiot would want to have pain. Of course for some its easier
to get an operation than work out. *shrug*

In article <MPG.21de1be6a5110b979896b6@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
forge@killallspammers.youneedageek.com says...
> In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
> b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
> says...
> > > A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.
> > > Take for example Natalie Portman, who is arguably one of the sexiest
> > > young women on Earth
> >
> > That would be Maggie Q.
>
> Who pray tell is this Maggie Q person?
>

Perhaps her?
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0702572/

Once Upon A Time,
William December Starr wrote:

>In article <4mu7n3hc0f79rj95pcm5pvoqhrr8gvth17@4ax.com>,
>Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> said:
>
>> Once Upon A Time,
>> suzee wrote:
>>
>>> The pain would be in the neck and shoulders Captain,
>>> not where you think you'd like to massage...
>>
>> I have experience in matters massage.
>
>And even more in matters pain in the neck.

You're just jealous because *I* get to massage all the big-boobed Usenet
girls while you're stuck there alone with your three names, one of which is
a MONTH and the other is a BEATLE! HAW! "Billy the Christmas Beatle",
they used to call you, pointing at you in your silly one-piece snow outfit
with the mittens tied to the sleeves so you wouldn't lose them. "Billy the
Christmas Beatle" they would mock, laughing at your short pants which your
mother had inefficiently hemmed up because she had bought them one size too
long, and which now showed four inches of white socks. "Billy the
Christmas Beatle", ringing in your ears as they giggled at your Moe Howard
haircut, which your dad had trimmed around your head using a salad bowl
because your family was too poor to send you to a real barber. "Billy the
Christmas Beatle" they....well, you get the point. HAW! AGAIN!


**
Captain Infinity
..."If I'm laughing at what I think I am, it's very funny."
--Homer Simpson

Pete B wrote:

> In article <13n8j2f4gkivc37@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>
>>"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
>>news:MPG.21dd9f40af68e93198b6ed@news.usenetserver. com...
>>
>>>In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
>>>b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
>>>says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>>>>pain they cause a woman's back.
>>>
>>>The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>>>trained away.
>>>
>>
>>And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the weight
>>they are meant to carry?
>
>
> We are talking "mean to carry" - but people not being in the shape they
> need to be. Anyway; I don't know the specific exercises.

There's a reason for that.

Seriously Pete, I challenge you to find a reasonable and responsible
program for this.

>
>
>>More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?
>
>
> No, only an idiot would want to have pain. Of course for some its easier
> to get an operation than work out. *shrug*
>

Probably that's because working out makes the pain worse.

"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21ded6b982227b4998b70e@news.usenetserver. com...
> In article <13n8j2f4gkivc37@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>>
>> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.21dd9f40af68e93198b6ed@news.usenetserver. com...
>> > In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
>> > b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
>> > says...
>> >
>> >> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>> >> pain they cause a woman's back.
>> >
>> > The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>> > trained away.
>> >
>> And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the weight
>> they are meant to carry?
>
> We are talking "mean to carry" - but people not being in the shape they
> need to be. Anyway; I don't know the specific exercises.
>
>> More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?
>
> No, only an idiot would want to have pain. Of course for some its easier
> to get an operation than work out. *shrug*
>
*LOL* Ok, we're talking about two different things here. I'm talking about
the idiots who go in for breast enlargement. You're talking about women who
are naturally large. In fact, there are other reasons to have breast
reduction surgery besides the pain, plus there are people who either cannot
do the exercises, or for whom the exercises won't work. However, I agree.
In those circumstances, I would try the exercises first, before resorting to
surgery.

In article <7b205911-218a-4463-a642-
3f9abc551b7a@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, aaronsan@msn.com says...

> Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
> and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".

If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)


> And you wouldn't kick her out of bed, either. ;)

Well... :)

In article <13na75886hfflac@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
<dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>
> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.21ded6b982227b4998b70e@news.usenetserver. com...
> > In article <13n8j2f4gkivc37@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> > <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
> >>
> >> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.21dd9f40af68e93198b6ed@news.usenetserver. com...
> >> > In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
> >> > b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
> >> > says...
> >> >
> >> >> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
> >> >> pain they cause a woman's back.
> >> >
> >> > The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
> >> > trained away.
> >> >
> >> And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the weight
> >> they are meant to carry?
> >
> > We are talking "mean to carry" - but people not being in the shape they
> > need to be. Anyway; I don't know the specific exercises.
> >
> >> More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?
> >
> > No, only an idiot would want to have pain. Of course for some its easier
> > to get an operation than work out. *shrug*
> >
> *LOL* Ok, we're talking about two different things here. I'm talking about
> the idiots who go in for breast enlargement.

Ah - well, it can have an impact on the psyche too I understand.

> You're talking about women who
> are naturally large. In fact, there are other reasons to have breast
> reduction surgery besides the pain, plus there are people who either cannot
> do the exercises, or for whom the exercises won't work. However, I agree.
> In those circumstances, I would try the exercises first, before resorting to
> surgery.

"exercise" sounds like a bit of skipping with a rope - I was talking
about building muscles. But to each their own.

In article <MPG.21ded6b982227b4998b70e@news.usenetserver.com>,
Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> said:

> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote
>>
>>> The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can
>>> be trained away.
>>
>> And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times
>> the weight they are meant to carry?
>
> We are talking "mean to carry" - but people not being in the shape
> they need to be. Anyway; I don't know the specific exercises.

But you know they exist. Because you, well, know it, right?

--
William December Starr <wdstarr@panix.com>

"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21df8d33800e9a6898b71e@news.usenetserver. com...
> In article <13na75886hfflac@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>>
>> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.21ded6b982227b4998b70e@news.usenetserver. com...
>> > In article <13n8j2f4gkivc37@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
>> > <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>> >>
>> >> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:MPG.21dd9f40af68e93198b6ed@news.usenetserver. com...
>> >> > In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
>> >> > b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
>> >> > says...
>> >> >
>> >> >> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>> >> >> pain they cause a woman's back.
>> >> >
>> >> > The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>> >> > trained away.
>> >> >
>> >> And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the
>> >> weight
>> >> they are meant to carry?
>> >
>> > We are talking "mean to carry" - but people not being in the shape they
>> > need to be. Anyway; I don't know the specific exercises.
>> >
>> >> More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?
>> >
>> > No, only an idiot would want to have pain. Of course for some its
>> > easier
>> > to get an operation than work out. *shrug*
>> >
>> *LOL* Ok, we're talking about two different things here. I'm talking
>> about
>> the idiots who go in for breast enlargement.
>
> Ah - well, it can have an impact on the psyche too I understand.

I suppose so, but I perfer the "learn to accept yourself as you are" type.
As far as I'm concerned, the only purpose for plastic surgery of any sort is
to correct something so disfiguring that is actually affects your quality of
life, as opposed to you making if affect your quality of life, if you get
what I mean.

>
>> You're talking about women who
>> are naturally large. In fact, there are other reasons to have breast
>> reduction surgery besides the pain, plus there are people who either
>> cannot
>> do the exercises, or for whom the exercises won't work. However, I
>> agree.
>> In those circumstances, I would try the exercises first, before resorting
>> to
>> surgery.
>
> "exercise" sounds like a bit of skipping with a rope - I was talking
> about building muscles. But to each their own.

*chuckle* How do you think you build muscles, if not by exercising them?

In article <13nbhibav58n345@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
<dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>
> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.21df8d33800e9a6898b71e@news.usenetserver. com...
> > In article <13na75886hfflac@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> > <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
> >>
> >> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.21ded6b982227b4998b70e@news.usenetserver. com...
> >> > In article <13n8j2f4gkivc37@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> >> > <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:MPG.21dd9f40af68e93198b6ed@news.usenetserver. com...
> >> >> > In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
> >> >> > b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
> >> >> > says...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
> >> >> >> pain they cause a woman's back.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
> >> >> > trained away.
> >> >> >
> >> >> And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the
> >> >> weight
> >> >> they are meant to carry?
> >> >
> >> > We are talking "mean to carry" - but people not being in the shape they
> >> > need to be. Anyway; I don't know the specific exercises.
> >> >
> >> >> More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?
> >> >
> >> > No, only an idiot would want to have pain. Of course for some its
> >> > easier
> >> > to get an operation than work out. *shrug*
> >> >
> >> *LOL* Ok, we're talking about two different things here. I'm talking
> >> about
> >> the idiots who go in for breast enlargement.
> >
> > Ah - well, it can have an impact on the psyche too I understand.
>
> I suppose so, but I perfer the "learn to accept yourself as you are" type.

I'm sure that brings greater joy in the long run, but has anyone ever
learned to teach HOW to do that?

> As far as I'm concerned, the only purpose for plastic surgery of any sort is
> to correct something so disfiguring that is actually affects your quality of
> life, as opposed to you making if affect your quality of life, if you get
> what I mean.

Yep, you think you are right ;)


> > "exercise" sounds like a bit of skipping with a rope - I was talking
> > about building muscles. But to each their own.
>
> *chuckle* How do you think you build muscles, if not by exercising them?

You mean thinking about it REALLY HARD doesn't work??!

In article <6b36e4e0-2281-482b-bc69-
f2553f3b3bca@c4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, aaronsan@msn.com says...
> On Dec 28, 4:46 pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > > You're talking about women who
> > > are naturally large.  In fact, there are other reasons to have breast
> > > reduction surgery besides the pain, plus there are people who either cannot
> > > do the exercises, or for whom the exercises won't work.  However, I agree.
> > > In those circumstances, I would try the exercises first, before resorting to
> > > surgery.
> >
> > "exercise" sounds like a bit of skipping with a rope
>
> I can't help thinking about that "Friends" episode with Chandler and
> Joey watching Baywatch.
>
> "They're running!"

Heh, perhaps the networks could try and - just loop that sequence *g*

On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:31:11 -0500, Forge
<forge@killallspammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:

>In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
>b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
>says...
>> > A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.
>> > Take for example Natalie Portman, who is arguably one of the sexiest
>> > young women on Earth
>>
>> That would be Maggie Q.
>
>Who pray tell is this Maggie Q person?

I take it you haven't seen "Live Free or Die Hard?" (Which sounds
like a patriotic porn movie to me, but still . . .)

-- Rob
--
LORELAI: I am so done with plans. I am never, ever making one again.
It never works. I spend the day obsessing over why it didn't work
and what I could've done differently. I'm analyzing all my shortcomings
when all I really need to be doing is vowing to never, ever make a plan
ever again, which I'm doing now, having once again been the innocent
victim of my own stupid plans. God, I need some coffee.

In article <fcbdn35q12blmmvi2e69scgjd21oam5g8a@4ax.com>,
ShutUpRob@aol.com says...
> On 26 Dec 2007 06:47:09 GMT, "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >I swore off teenage girls decades ago
>
> Ian J. Ball hasn't.
>
> (Ba-dum-bum pssssh!)
>
> Thank you and gooooood night! You've been a wonderful audience!

You are here all week!

In article <dibdn39ct2g88tpm4d45lv7s2cckmcpmjt@4ax.com>,
ShutUpRob@aol.com says...
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:31:11 -0500, Forge
> <forge@killallspammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
> >b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
> >says...
> >> > A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.
> >> > Take for example Natalie Portman, who is arguably one of the sexiest
> >> > young women on Earth
> >>
> >> That would be Maggie Q.
> >
> >Who pray tell is this Maggie Q person?
>
> I take it you haven't seen "Live Free or Die Hard?" (Which sounds
> like a patriotic porn movie to me, but still . . .)

There was a hot Asian girlie in that? I seem to have forgotten. All I
remember is Willis and the Mac.

= )

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:20:59 -0500, Forge
<forge@killallspammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:

>In article <dibdn39ct2g88tpm4d45lv7s2cckmcpmjt@4ax.com>,
>ShutUpRob@aol.com says...
>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:31:11 -0500, Forge
>> <forge@killallspammers.youneedageek.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <5a0dc16a-dc6f-46e1-b7a8-
>> >b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
>> >says...
>> >> > A woman does not need breasts the size of her head in order to be sexy.
>> >> > Take for example Natalie Portman, who is arguably one of the sexiest
>> >> > young women on Earth
>> >>
>> >> That would be Maggie Q.
>> >
>> >Who pray tell is this Maggie Q person?
>>
>> I take it you haven't seen "Live Free or Die Hard?" (Which sounds
>> like a patriotic porn movie to me, but still . . .)
>
>There was a hot Asian girlie in that? I seem to have forgotten. All I
>remember is Willis and the Mac.

The bad guy's henchwoman/girlfriend Maya was played by Maggie Q.
(Just saw the DVD last week, btw.)

-- Rob
--
LORELAI: I am so done with plans. I am never, ever making one again.
It never works. I spend the day obsessing over why it didn't work
and what I could've done differently. I'm analyzing all my shortcomings
when all I really need to be doing is vowing to never, ever make a plan
ever again, which I'm doing now, having once again been the innocent
victim of my own stupid plans. God, I need some coffee.

In article <13ne0g4ktfm7ta8@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
<dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...

> >> I suppose so, but I perfer the "learn to accept yourself as you are"
> >> type.
> >
> > I'm sure that brings greater joy in the long run, but has anyone ever
> > learned to teach HOW to do that?
>
> Yes.

I remain sceptical.

>
> >> As far as I'm concerned, the only purpose for plastic surgery of any sort
> >> is
> >> to correct something so disfiguring that is actually affects your quality
> >> of
> >> life, as opposed to you making if affect your quality of life, if you get
> >> what I mean.
> >
> > Yep, you think you are right ;)
>
> Don't most people?

Perhaps, but I suppose the difference is the thinking ones viewpoint is
best for oneself and needing to be right.

In article <f27c5cdb-f237-42c5-a49f-fdb35c3764d2
@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_troy@yahoo.com says...
>
>
> Pete B wrote:
> > martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> >
> > > > Sure she is - you just like 'em that way *g*
> > >
> > > It doesn't change the fact Kristen is flat as a board next
> > > to Hayden, however. Granted, Hayden doesn't have tits the size of
> > > watermelons. Is that how _you_ like 'em? :)
> >
> > Well visible would be nice ;)
>
> As I said elsewhere, you need glasses.

You are just desperate.

In article <d8e09aa3-c0a5-4d7b-ab3a-
6970c7193cce@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_troy@yahoo.com says...
>
>
> Pete B wrote:
> >, aaronsan@msn.com says...
> >
> > > Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
> > > and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
> >
> > If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>
>
> No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
> chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
> think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."

Well, you can't arrange the world to suit idiots (and they are idiots if
they think everybody is the same, especially since you keep going on
about how your view is the only one right)

In article <8e2a555e-0905-4b58-b349-f2b5c2e269f0
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> On Dec 30, 8:21 pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > In article <d8e09aa3-c0a5-4d7b-ab3a-
> > 6970c7193...@z26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_t...@yahoo.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > Pete B wrote:
> > > >, aaron...@msn.com says...
> >
> > > > > Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
> > > > > and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
> >
> > > > If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
> >
> > > No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
> > > chest is the same size as Haydn's.  Apparently Pete and other men
> > > think that's inadequate.  Maybe I should get silicon implants."
> >
> > Well, you can't arrange the world to suit idiots (and they are idiots if
> > they think everybody is the same, especially since you keep going on
> > about how your view is the only one right)
>
> I think there's a world of difference between "She's too flat" and
> "Her tits are not big enough for my taste". The latter is clearly an
> opinion whereas the former would be considered a mean thing to say to
> Hayden's face.

Really? More routines I don't understand. Except I would never comment
on such things in her presence (nor anybody elses)

> I realize that this is the internet but I always
> imagine when I type something that I am saying it to a person's face,
> as I don't know who may be reading it.

Does it keep you out of trouble? :)

SFTV_troy wrote:

>
> Pete B wrote:
>
>> martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
>>
>>
>>>>Sure she is - you just like 'em that way *g*
>>>
>>>It doesn't change the fact Kristen is flat as a board next
>>>to Hayden, however. Granted, Hayden doesn't have tits the size of
>>>watermelons. Is that how _you_ like 'em? :)
>>
>>Well visible would be nice ;)
>
>
> As I said elsewhere, you need glasses. There's nothing attractive
> about a woman who has breasts the same size as a cow.
>
> A and B is fine with me!
> QUALITY not quantity is what matters.
>

Taking the liberty of speaking for everyone who is over a B cup, let
me just say:

gosh, thanks.

SFTV_troy wrote:

>
> Pete B wrote:
>
>>, aaronsan@msn.com says...
>>
>>
>>>Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
>>>and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
>>
>>If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>
>
>
> No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
> chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
> think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."


But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
female population cows. Gotcha.

"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21e1890affbabb9b98b749@news.usenetserver. com...
> In article <13ne0g4ktfm7ta8@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>
>> >> I suppose so, but I perfer the "learn to accept yourself as you are"
>> >> type.
>> >
>> > I'm sure that brings greater joy in the long run, but has anyone ever
>> > learned to teach HOW to do that?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> I remain sceptical.

Are you looking for a spelling flame?

Spammers do it all the time. And then there are the hackers.

>> >> As far as I'm concerned, the only purpose for plastic surgery of any
>> >> sort
>> >> is
>> >> to correct something so disfiguring that is actually affects your
>> >> quality
>> >> of
>> >> life, as opposed to you making if affect your quality of life, if you
>> >> get
>> >> what I mean.
>> >
>> > Yep, you think you are right ;)
>>
>> Don't most people?
>
> Perhaps, but I suppose the difference is the thinking ones viewpoint is
> best for oneself and needing to be right.

What did you think I meant by "As far as I am concerned"?

In article <13nfoalcigs26da@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
<dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>
> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.21e1890affbabb9b98b749@news.usenetserver. com...
> > In article <13ne0g4ktfm7ta8@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> > <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
> >
> >> >> I suppose so, but I perfer the "learn to accept yourself as you are"
> >> >> type.
> >> >
> >> > I'm sure that brings greater joy in the long run, but has anyone ever
> >> > learned to teach HOW to do that?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >
> > I remain sceptical.
>
> Are you looking for a spelling flame?

No I'm looking for my keyboard.

Once Upon A Time,
peachy ashie passion wrote:

>SFTV_troy wrote:
>
>>
>> Pete B wrote:
>>
>>>, aaronsan@msn.com says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
>>>>and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
>>>
>>>If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>>
>>
>>
>> No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
>> chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
>> think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
>
>
> But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
>female population cows. Gotcha.

Peachie, meet Troy Heagy. He's called women much worse things than cows.
He's a raging misogynist who cannot control his impulses to post his hatred
of females across numerous Usenet groups. He's widely regarded as a troll
and a nuisance. In my own humble opinion, the sooner he contracts an
inoperable case of prostate cancer, the better.



**
Captain Infinity

"Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21e2075c6fe0256598b759@news.usenetserver. com...
> In article <13nfoalcigs26da@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
> <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>>
>> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.21e1890affbabb9b98b749@news.usenetserver. com...
>> > In article <13ne0g4ktfm7ta8@corp.supernews.com>, "Dragonlady"
>> > <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> says...
>> >
>> >> >> I suppose so, but I perfer the "learn to accept yourself as you
>> >> >> are"
>> >> >> type.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm sure that brings greater joy in the long run, but has anyone
>> >> > ever
>> >> > learned to teach HOW to do that?
>> >>
>> >> Yes.
>> >
>> > I remain sceptical.
>>
>> Are you looking for a spelling flame?
>
> No I'm looking for my keyboard.
>
If you lost your keyboard, what are you typing on?

In article <f6474a22-7046-4ea7-92cd-33cca28ad632
@w47g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_troy@yahoo.com says...

>
> Whereas you think it's okay to call A & B sized women "flat chested"
> and noth worth looking at. That's pretty damn shallow.

You are talking about yourself there.

In article <4b966ee8-daeb-4282-b4c9-
c50f6207f15c@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_troy@yahoo.com says...

> > But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
> > female population cows. Gotcha.
>
>
> Not what I said. I was putting-down the mentality of women who think
> they need to go fill themselves with silicone ballons. Shallow. (And
> so are the men that called them flat-chested.)

No, you were putting down all women on the planet who didn't look
exactly like you want - you are the one who is shallow.

In article <k2sfn31v2vrtm8k1t2lmdmr5njes6fqdjk@4ax.com>,
Infinity@captaininfinity.us says...
> Once Upon A Time,
> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
> >SFTV_troy wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Pete B wrote:
> >>
> >>>, aaronsan@msn.com says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
> >>>>and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
> >>>
> >>>If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
> >> chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
> >> think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
> >
> >
> > But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
> >female population cows. Gotcha.
>
> Peachie, meet Troy Heagy. He's called women much worse things than cows.
> He's a raging misogynist who cannot control his impulses to post his hatred
> of females across numerous Usenet groups. He's widely regarded as a troll
> and a nuisance. In my own humble opinion, the sooner he contracts an
> inoperable case of prostate cancer, the better.


Wow, a pious wish in this holy time *g*

Martin Phipps wrote:
> On Dec 31, 4:41 am, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
>> In article <4b966ee8-daeb-4282-b4c9-
>> c50f6207f...@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_t...@yahoo.com says...
>>
>>>> But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
>>>> female population cows. Gotcha.
>>> Not what I said. I was putting-down the mentality of women who think
>>> they need to go fill themselves with silicone ballons. Shallow. (And
>>> so are the men that called them flat-chested.)
>> No, you were putting down all women on the planet who didn't look
>> exactly like you want - you are the one who is shallow.
>
> Stop right there, Pete. Before you start a flame war, admit that
> "She's too flat" was an awfully shallow thing to say.


More shallow than her chest?

Martin Phipps wrote:

> On Dec 31, 3:27 am, Captain Infinity <Infin...@captaininfinity.us>
> wrote:
>
>>Once Upon A Time,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>
>>>SFTV_troy wrote:
>>
>>>>Pete B wrote:
>>
>>>>>, aaron...@msn.com says...
>>
>>>>>>Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
>>>>>>and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
>>
>>>>>If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>>
>>>>No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
>>>>chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
>>>>think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
>>
>>> But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
>>>female population cows. Gotcha.
>>
>>Peachie, meet Troy Heagy. He's called women much worse things than cows.
>
>
> He didn't call any woman a cow. He said he didn't like breasts the
> size of cow teats.


Gotcha. So calling my tits cow teats is in NO WAY the same as
calling me a cow?

??

In article <IuZdj.964$Ug5.573@trnddc06>,
peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Martin Phipps wrote:
>
> > On Dec 31, 3:27 am, Captain Infinity <Infin...@captaininfinity.us>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Once Upon A Time,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >>
> >>>SFTV_troy wrote:
> >>
> >>>>Pete B wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>, aaron...@msn.com says...
> >>
> >>>>>>Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
> >>>>>>and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
> >>
> >>>>>If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
> >>
> >>>>No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
> >>>>chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
> >>>>think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
> >>
> >>> But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
> >>>female population cows. Gotcha.
> >>
> >>Peachie, meet Troy Heagy. He's called women much worse things than cows.
> >
> >
> > He didn't call any woman a cow. He said he didn't like breasts the
> > size of cow teats.
>
>
> Gotcha. So calling my tits cow teats is in NO WAY the same as
> calling me a cow?
>
> ??

Udderly different.

--
Jitterbug phones:
Fourth one is one the way. We'll see what happens. :\

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:02:12 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net> wrote:

>In article <IuZdj.964$Ug5.573@trnddc06>,
> peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> Gotcha. So calling my tits cow teats is in NO WAY the same as
>> calling me a cow?
>>
>> ??
>
>Udderly different.

I just discovered Bag Balm. Great stuff. Smooths the calluses on my heels.
-:)
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There would be a lot more civility in this world if people
didn't take that as an invitation to walk all over you"
(Calvin and Hobbes)

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:10:42 -0800 (PST), Martin Phipps
<martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Dec 31, 4:41 am, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
>> In article <4b966ee8-daeb-4282-b4c9-
>> c50f6207f...@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_t...@yahoo.com says...
>>
>> > >    But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
>> > > female population cows.  Gotcha.
>>
>> > Not what I said.  I was putting-down the mentality of women who think
>> > they need to go fill themselves with silicone ballons.  Shallow.  (And
>> > so are the men that called them flat-chested.)
>>
>> No, you were putting down all women on the planet who didn't look
>> exactly like you want - you are the one who is shallow.
>
>Stop right there, Pete. Before you start a flame war, admit that
>"She's too flat" was an awfully shallow thing to say.
>
>I guess while Heroes is on hiatus, people are getting bored and are
>itching to fight about anything at all, including the size of Hayden's
>tatas.

A flame war would likely break out over that subject whether or not
the show were going into hiatus. Wait, nix that -- we're into repeats
of everything, so, really, posting behavior in the TV newsgroups
should be going *down,* with the expected rate of flamewars also going
down, as they do every summer.

So the only explanation I can figure is that too many people are
arguing about Hayden's figure and too few are arguing about Connie
Britton's figure. Grrr!

-- Rob
--
LORELAI: I am so done with plans. I am never, ever making one again.
It never works. I spend the day obsessing over why it didn't work
and what I could've done differently. I'm analyzing all my shortcomings
when all I really need to be doing is vowing to never, ever make a plan
ever again, which I'm doing now, having once again been the innocent
victim of my own stupid plans. God, I need some coffee.

In article <2f35ba61-ebb5-48a9-8a2d-edc188afe502
@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> > of females across numerous Usenet groups.  He's widely regarded as a troll
> > and a nuisance.  In my own humble opinion, the sooner he contracts an
> > inoperable case of prostate cancer, the better.
>
> From personal experience, I think we should be wary whenever somebody
> cries "troll".
>

In the end we are all trolls! *g*

In article <95862f5e-d595-4852-95b6-38d1900381a5
@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> On Dec 31, 4:41 am, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> > In article <4b966ee8-daeb-4282-b4c9-
> > c50f6207f...@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_t...@yahoo.com says...
> >
> > > >    But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
> > > > female population cows.  Gotcha.
> >
> > > Not what I said.  I was putting-down the mentality of women who think
> > > they need to go fill themselves with silicone ballons.  Shallow.  (And
> > > so are the men that called them flat-chested.)
> >
> > No, you were putting down all women on the planet who didn't look
> > exactly like you want - you are the one who is shallow.
>
> Stop right there, Pete. Before you start a flame war,

I'm ignoring him now, so it wont be with him. Or do you want to flame?
:)

> admit that
> "She's too flat" was an awfully shallow thing to say.

I don't agree, it was about looks - but then THE WHOLE THREAD was about
looks - so its hypocritical for one person who comment on looks to
pretend to be annoyed that others then do the same. She sounds rather
likeable in interviews and acts well enough on heroes, but that wasn't
the subject of the thread.

>
> I guess while Heroes is on hiatus, people are getting bored and are
> itching to fight about anything at all, including the size of Hayden's
> tatas.

Man is at war with himself, that is why he is at war with each other.

In article <SYXdj.276330$Fc.60186@attbi_s21>, gmsinghs@email.com says...
> >
> > Stop right there, Pete. Before you start a flame war, admit that
> > "She's too flat" was an awfully shallow thing to say.
>
>
> More shallow than her chest?
>

Erm.... hehe ;)

In article <0vugn3t6hkeiej1q3slag2jjob0o52bmu8@4ax.com>,
ShutUpRob@aol.com says...
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:10:42 -0800 (PST), Martin Phipps
> <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Dec 31, 4:41 am, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
> >> In article <4b966ee8-daeb-4282-b4c9-
> >> c50f6207f...@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_t...@yahoo.com says...
> >>
> >> > >    But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
> >> > > female population cows.  Gotcha.
> >>
> >> > Not what I said.  I was putting-down the mentality of women who think
> >> > they need to go fill themselves with silicone ballons.  Shallow.  (And
> >> > so are the men that called them flat-chested.)
> >>
> >> No, you were putting down all women on the planet who didn't look
> >> exactly like you want - you are the one who is shallow.
> >
> >Stop right there, Pete. Before you start a flame war, admit that
> >"She's too flat" was an awfully shallow thing to say.
> >
> >I guess while Heroes is on hiatus, people are getting bored and are
> >itching to fight about anything at all, including the size of Hayden's
> >tatas.
>
> A flame war would likely break out over that subject whether or not
> the show were going into hiatus. Wait, nix that -- we're into repeats
> of everything, so, really, posting behavior in the TV newsgroups
> should be going *down,* with the expected rate of flamewars also going
> down, as they do every summer.
>
> So the only explanation I can figure is that too many people are
> arguing about Hayden's figure and too few are arguing about Connie
> Britton's figure. Grrr!
>

We can argue about her. Her feet are way too big!


*g*

In article <IuZdj.964$Ug5.573@trnddc06>, exquisitepeach@hotmail.com
says...
> >
> > He didn't call any woman a cow. He said he didn't like breasts the
> > size of cow teats.
>
>
> Gotcha. So calling my tits cow teats is in NO WAY the same as
> calling me a cow?
>
> ??
>

Got milk? :)

In article <bc88837b-aa75-4da9-870c-aed0a5288d69
@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> The fact is that calling somebody a troll when they
> aren't trolling is often used as a way to attack somebody when you
> don't like what they have to say but don't have any other argument to
> offer against it.
>

Yes, that does seem to be the case not just on usenet but on most
boards. It has degenerated into a general internet pejorative.

In article <574438ae-6ab4-4525-a4e6-428b1c8afa18
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...

> > I'm ignoring him now, so it wont be with him. Or do you want to flame?
> > :)
>
> Are you ignoring him because somebody else said he was a troll?

Heck no, do I strike you as someone who cares about what others say? :)

Because I felt it either through stupidity or just maliciousness
misrepresented and twisted what i said.

>
> > > admit that
> > > "She's too flat" was an awfully shallow thing to say.
> >
> > I don't agree, it was about looks - but then THE WHOLE THREAD was about
> > looks
>
> Okay. So I'm shallow, you're shallow, he's shallow and women who opt
> for plastic surgury are shallow. When you say "you are the ONE who is
> shallow" (emphasis mine) you are saying that he is shallow exclusively
> of everybody else.

I made a comment which was obviously a personal reflection, he starts
thread after thread where he condemns more or less famous women for
looking wrong, because they must look like he wants or they are sick and
have personal problems. That would seem shallow, though perhaps also a
bit psychotic.


> > - so its hypocritical for one person who comment on looks to
> > pretend to be annoyed that others then do the same.
>
> Are people not allowed to disagree with you?

Wow, that question seems to imply I can prevent them from doing so - how
would I go about that?

Does it involve blood? I prefer not to look at blood.

Once Upon A Time,
Martin Phipps wrote:

>> Wariness doesn't make Troy Heagy any less a troll.  He might as well
>> change his name to 0mar.
>
>So you say. The fact is that calling somebody a troll when they
>aren't trolling is often used as a way to attack somebody when you
>don't like what they have to say but don't have any other argument to
>offer against it.
>
>Just to give you the benefit of the doubt, I'll try searching Troy's
>posts using google for typical mysogunistic terms just to see if there
>is any real basis for this accusation. It should only take a few
>minutes.

Wow, you must be new here, or perhaps Troy hasn't crossposted to the Heroes
group before (if that's where you're reading this, I dunno). Troy Heagy is
a classic hate-troll. This particular one, where he picks a female
celebrity and judges her based on body appearance, is one he trots out
every 3 or 4 months, just to stir up the exact type of controversy he's
started with this thread, issues of body weight and breast size. The last
time he tried was around August, and before that in April. He'll post a
flame starter, and then when the responses come in he'll craft a generic
reply which he spams multiple times as a followup to every objection. Then
he sits back while the other posters tear into each other. He's already
done this 3 times this month with 3 different celebrities; Hayden seems to
have struck the proper nerve. He stops posting shortly after people who
know him join the thread to warn the others they're dancing to the tune of
a troll.

Another one he likes is to crosspost to the TV and parental groups that
parents aren't raising their kids right, not enough discipline in what they
allow their kids to watch. The truth is that Troy has no kids of his own.
Nor does he have a wife or a girlfriend, and there doesn't seem to be one
on the horizon. His views on child-rearing and the body type of the
perfect woman ("QUALITY not QUANTITY!") are exquisitely ironic, given the
invisible and intangible natures of his significant others.

If you really plan to read his past posts (urgh, I think I threw up a
little in my mouth at the thought of it) be sure to check *all* of his
filter-foiling nym-shifts (Anim, you may want to post the list for Martin's
benefit). Oh, and don't forget to look for "udders", he likes to use that
one a lot.



**
Captain Infinity
..."It's not a troll...it's an opinion."
--Troy Heagy, noted Usenet troll

Once Upon A Time,
Martin Phipps wrote:

>Apparently, Troy considers "[Jennifer Love] Hewitt,
>Britney [Spears], and Tyra Banks" to all be fat but asserts that it is
>a concern for their health that he says so. He also asserts that Tom
>Cruise is getting fat.

Ah, 5 celebs (including Hayden) with his current nym, I though it was 3. I
guess I haven't been paying close attention. They all seem to run together
after a while.


**
Captain Infinity

Once Upon A Time,
Martin Phipps wrote:

>On Dec 31, 7:12 pm, Captain Infinity <Infin...@captaininfinity.us>
>wrote:
>
>> If you really plan to read his past posts (urgh, I think I threw up a
>> little in my mouth at the thought of it) be sure to check *all* of his
>> filter-foiling nym-shifts (Anim, you may want to post the list for Martin's
>> benefit).  Oh, and don't forget to look for "udders", he likes to use that
>> one a lot.
>
>nym-shifts don't fool google unless the mail address is different.

That's exactly what he does. He has multiple accounts at yahoo.com and
gmail.com.

>Google only has posts for SFTV_troy going back four months. The term
>"udder" didn't get any hits, at least not from that address.
>Sorry. :)

Don't be sorry, you were spared the bulk of his rants. When I get home
from work, if Anim8 hasn't posted the list for your pleasure, I'll see what
my archive turns up. I think Troy's last nym was
"SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com" or something like that.

By the way, he also prowls the eBay forums, stirring up the same type of
crap over there, where he's well known and reviled. Trolling message
boards seems to be a fetish of his. Though, actually, he hasn't posted
over there (eBay) for a while; it's possible the admins shut him down.


**
Captain Infinity

In article <f27c5cdb-f237-42c5-a49f-fdb35c3764d2
@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, SFTV_troy@yahoo.com says...
>
>
> Pete B wrote:
> > martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> >
> > > > Sure she is - you just like 'em that way *g*
> > >
> > > It doesn't change the fact Kristen is flat as a board next
> > > to Hayden, however. Granted, Hayden doesn't have tits the size of
> > > watermelons. Is that how _you_ like 'em? :)
> >
> > Well visible would be nice ;)
>
> As I said elsewhere, you need glasses. There's nothing attractive
> about a woman who has breasts the same size as a cow.
>
> A and B is fine with me!
> QUALITY not quantity is what matters.

Oh I never EVER meant to imply there's anything wrong with big breasts -
just that there's nothing wrong with little ones either. I'm pretty much
happy with the existence of breasts, full stop.

Not much of a fan of the silicone ones, especially when looking at a
woman makes you wonder how she unlocks her front door.

In article <8e2a555e-0905-4b58-b349-f2b5c2e269f0
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
> > > > > Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
> > > > > and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
> >
> > > > If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
> >
> > > No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
> > > chest is the same size as Haydn's.  Apparently Pete and other men
> > > think that's inadequate.  Maybe I should get silicon implants."
> >
> > Well, you can't arrange the world to suit idiots (and they are idiots if
> > they think everybody is the same, especially since you keep going on
> > about how your view is the only one right)
>
> I think there's a world of difference between "She's too flat" and
> "Her tits are not big enough for my taste". The latter is clearly an
> opinion whereas the former would be considered a mean thing to say to
> Hayden's face. I realize that this is the internet but I always
> imagine when I type something that I am saying it to a person's face,
> as I don't know who may be reading it.

Never mind that she's an EIGHTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL, she's barely even done
with puberty yet, and NO woman's body stays the same for more than four
or five years, no matter what they do.

In article <0vugn3t6hkeiej1q3slag2jjob0o52bmu8@4ax.com>,
ShutUpRob@aol.com says...
> So the only explanation I can figure is that too many people are
> arguing about Hayden's figure and too few are arguing about Connie
> Britton's figure. Grrr!

(Googles)

OMG, a grownup!!!! ::dies from joy::

In article <ueihn3h1qblmmppqkv7e2hanl85gk4peo5@4ax.com>,
Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:

> Another one he likes is to crosspost to the TV and parental groups that
> parents aren't raising their kids right, not enough discipline in what they
> allow their kids to watch.

Well, the guy may be an Olympic class troll but he's not wrong about
that-- at least to the extent that a significant percentage of parents
out there seem to want the government to do their filtering for them.

"peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:IuZdj.964$Ug5.573@trnddc06...
> Martin Phipps wrote:
>
>> On Dec 31, 3:27 am, Captain Infinity <Infin...@captaininfinity.us>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Once Upon A Time,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>
>>>>SFTV_troy wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Pete B wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>, aaron...@msn.com says...
>>>
>>>>>>>Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
>>>>>>>and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
>>>
>>>>>>If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>>>
>>>>>No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
>>>>>chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
>>>>>think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
>>>
>>>> But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
>>>>female population cows. Gotcha.
>>>
>>>Peachie, meet Troy Heagy. He's called women much worse things than cows.
>>
>>
>> He didn't call any woman a cow. He said he didn't like breasts the
>> size of cow teats.
>
>
> Gotcha. So calling my tits cow teats is in NO WAY the same as calling
> me a cow?
>
> ??

There actually are no women who have tits like cow teats.

Once Upon A Time,
Thanatos wrote:

>In article <ueihn3h1qblmmppqkv7e2hanl85gk4peo5@4ax.com>,
> Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>
>> Another one he likes is to crosspost to the TV and parental groups that
>> parents aren't raising their kids right, not enough discipline in what they
>> allow their kids to watch.
>
>Well, the guy may be an Olympic class troll but he's not wrong about
>that-- at least to the extent that a significant percentage of parents
>out there seem to want the government to do their filtering for them.

I have no argument with the concept. What I find outrageous is that Troy,
as a childless, single man with no prospects, has the brass balls to go
online and preach to parents as to how they should raise their children.

You would have to read his posts on the subject to understand. But if you
haven't, I envy you.


**
Captain Infinity

In article <e7cin3t2khccf3l92berd7qs4lppt9m78e@4ax.com>,
Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:

> Once Upon A Time,
> Thanatos wrote:
>
> >In article <ueihn3h1qblmmppqkv7e2hanl85gk4peo5@4ax.com>,
> > Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
> >
> >> Another one he likes is to crosspost to the TV and parental groups that
> >> parents aren't raising their kids right, not enough discipline in what they
> >> allow their kids to watch.
> >
> >Well, the guy may be an Olympic class troll but he's not wrong about
> >that-- at least to the extent that a significant percentage of parents
> >out there seem to want the government to do their filtering for them.
>
> I have no argument with the concept. What I find outrageous is that Troy,
> as a childless, single man with no prospects, has the brass balls to go
> online and preach to parents as to how they should raise their children.

Well, one does not have to have children in order to be affected by the
lack of proper parent resonsibility these days. As I mentioned, parents
now expect the government to do their filtering for them through force
of law, which affects the childless as well. Those of us without kids
are being forced to have our entertainment options either limited or
dumbed-down and made kid-friendly because those with kids have abdicated
their parental role to the heavy hand of the government.

I'm not defending Troy. He's apparently an ***. But the idea that one
needs to have kids in order to legitimately criticize the lack of
parental responsibility in others is a fallacious one.

Once Upon A Time,
Thanatos wrote:

>In article <e7cin3t2khccf3l92berd7qs4lppt9m78e@4ax.com>,
> Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>
>> Once Upon A Time,
>> Thanatos wrote:
>>
>> >In article <ueihn3h1qblmmppqkv7e2hanl85gk4peo5@4ax.com>,
>> > Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Another one he likes is to crosspost to the TV and parental groups that
>> >> parents aren't raising their kids right, not enough discipline in what they
>> >> allow their kids to watch.
>> >
>> >Well, the guy may be an Olympic class troll but he's not wrong about
>> >that-- at least to the extent that a significant percentage of parents
>> >out there seem to want the government to do their filtering for them.
>>
>> I have no argument with the concept. What I find outrageous is that Troy,
>> as a childless, single man with no prospects, has the brass balls to go
>> online and preach to parents as to how they should raise their children.
>
>Well, one does not have to have children in order to be affected by the
>lack of proper parent resonsibility these days. As I mentioned, parents
>now expect the government to do their filtering for them through force
>of law, which affects the childless as well. Those of us without kids
>are being forced to have our entertainment options either limited or
>dumbed-down and made kid-friendly because those with kids have abdicated
>their parental role to the heavy hand of the government.
>
>I'm not defending Troy. He's apparently an ***. But the idea that one
>needs to have kids in order to legitimately criticize the lack of
>parental responsibility in others is a fallacious one.

See, everything you've said above is reasonable and rational. Now take it
to the next level. Crosspost your opinion to parental groups and the TV
groups. Address your thoughts scattershot across a wide range of faceless
entities that may happen upon your post. And berate them. Preach to them.
Blame them. Scold them and tell them in no uncertain terms exactly how
they have failed their children, society and themselves. And then proceed
to tell them exactly what they should be doing. If anyone responds, craft
a single reply and cut&paste it multiple times as a followup to each one.
If the flames die down, repeat your original premise. Turn the followup
posters against each other. Then sit back and watch the newsgroups burn.

Do that and you'll quickly understand why Troy is in so many people's
killfiles.

But not mine because I like to taunt and torture the moronic twat every
chance I get. He's an itch I can't stop scratching. If you see Troy
you'll probably see me as well. You may want to killfile us both.


**
Captain Infinity

Forge wrote:

> In article <8e2a555e-0905-4b58-b349-f2b5c2e269f0
> @e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com says...
>
>>>>>>Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
>>>>>>and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
>>>
>>>>>If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>>>
>>>>No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
>>>>chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
>>>>think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
>>>
>>>Well, you can't arrange the world to suit idiots (and they are idiots if
>>>they think everybody is the same, especially since you keep going on
>>>about how your view is the only one right)
>>
>>I think there's a world of difference between "She's too flat" and
>>"Her tits are not big enough for my taste". The latter is clearly an
>>opinion whereas the former would be considered a mean thing to say to
>>Hayden's face. I realize that this is the internet but I always
>>imagine when I type something that I am saying it to a person's face,
>>as I don't know who may be reading it.
>
>
> Never mind that she's an EIGHTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL, she's barely even done
> with puberty yet, and NO woman's body stays the same for more than four
> or five years, no matter what they do.
>

*sigh* Alas, this is true.

Dragonlady wrote:
> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:IuZdj.964$Ug5.573@trnddc06...
>> Martin Phipps wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 31, 3:27 am, Captain Infinity <Infin...@captaininfinity.us>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Once Upon A Time,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> SFTV_troy wrote:
>>>>>> Pete B wrote:
>>>>>>> , aaron...@msn.com says...
>>>>>>>> Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not "flatchested"
>>>>>>>> and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
>>>>>>> If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>>>>>> No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
>>>>>> chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
>>>>>> think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
>>>>> But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
>>>>> female population cows. Gotcha.
>>>> Peachie, meet Troy Heagy. He's called women much worse things than cows.
>>>
>>> He didn't call any woman a cow. He said he didn't like breasts the
>>> size of cow teats.
>>
>> Gotcha. So calling my tits cow teats is in NO WAY the same as calling
>> me a cow?
>>
>> ??
>
> There actually are no women who have tits like cow teats.

They couldn't possibly.

Forge wrote:

> In article <0vugn3t6hkeiej1q3slag2jjob0o52bmu8@4ax.com>,
> ShutUpRob@aol.com says...
>
>>So the only explanation I can figure is that too many people are
>>arguing about Hayden's figure and too few are arguing about Connie
>>Britton's figure. Grrr!
>
>
> (Googles)
>
> OMG, a grownup!!!! ::dies from joy::
>

*is torn between the google images page and reviving Forge*

Thanatos wrote:

> In article <e7cin3t2khccf3l92berd7qs4lppt9m78e@4ax.com>,
> Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>
>
>>Once Upon A Time,
>>Thanatos wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <ueihn3h1qblmmppqkv7e2hanl85gk4peo5@4ax.com>,
>>>Captain Infinity <Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Another one he likes is to crosspost to the TV and parental groups that
>>>>parents aren't raising their kids right, not enough discipline in what they
>>>>allow their kids to watch.
>>>
>>>Well, the guy may be an Olympic class troll but he's not wrong about
>>>that-- at least to the extent that a significant percentage of parents
>>>out there seem to want the government to do their filtering for them.
>>
>>I have no argument with the concept. What I find outrageous is that Troy,
>>as a childless, single man with no prospects, has the brass balls to go
>>online and preach to parents as to how they should raise their children.
>
>
> Well, one does not have to have children in order to be affected by the
> lack of proper parent resonsibility these days. As I mentioned, parents
> now expect the government to do their filtering for them through force
> of law, which affects the childless as well. Those of us without kids
> are being forced to have our entertainment options either limited or
> dumbed-down and made kid-friendly because those with kids have abdicated
> their parental role to the heavy hand of the government.

The flaw to your theory is that the parents agitating for more
censorship are already heavily censoring what their children see.

The ones that don't care enough to monitor what their children watch
sure as hell don't care enough to agitate for someone else to do it!

"suzee" <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote in message
news:4779a549$0$47131$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net...
> Dragonlady wrote:
>> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:IuZdj.964$Ug5.573@trnddc06...
>>> Martin Phipps wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Dec 31, 3:27 am, Captain Infinity <Infin...@captaininfinity.us>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Once Upon A Time,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> SFTV_troy wrote:
>>>>>>> Pete B wrote:
>>>>>>>> , aaron...@msn.com says...
>>>>>>>>> Stop being mean to the poor lil' cheerleader. She's not
>>>>>>>>> "flatchested"
>>>>>>>>> and she doesn't have the "body of a boy".
>>>>>>>> If I thought she was reading this forum I would stop at once :)
>>>>>>> No but there are OTHER women reading this forum and thinking, "My
>>>>>>> chest is the same size as Haydn's. Apparently Pete and other men
>>>>>>> think that's inadequate. Maybe I should get silicon implants."
>>>>>> But apparently you are a-okay with having called the rest of the
>>>>>> female population cows. Gotcha.
>>>>> Peachie, meet Troy Heagy. He's called women much worse things than
>>>>> cows.
>>>>
>>>> He didn't call any woman a cow. He said he didn't like breasts the
>>>> size of cow teats.
>>>
>>> Gotcha. So calling my tits cow teats is in NO WAY the same as
>>> calling me a cow?
>>>
>>> ??
>>
>> There actually are no women who have tits like cow teats.
>
> They couldn't possibly.

Yes, apparently someone knows nothing about cows. :P

In article <uwgej.1927$Je6.1455@trnddc01>, exquisitepeach@hotmail.com
says...
> > Never mind that she's an EIGHTEEN YEAR OLD GIRL, she's barely even done
> > with puberty yet, and NO woman's body stays the same for more than four
> > or five years, no matter what they do.
> >
>
> *sigh* Alas, this is true.

Usually a good thing. Women generally get curvier as they age and the
hips do this... the hips get... I can't concentrate thinking about it.

and thus Dragonlady inscribed ...
> "Pete B" <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote in message
>> b4a0b184725e@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, martinphipps2@yahoo.com
>> says...
>>> Great big boobs look ridiculous on anybody. The real issue is the
>>> pain they cause a woman's back.
>> The pain is because of muscle weakness, its something which can be
>> trained away.
> And how do you train back muscles to carry three or four times the weight
> they are meant to carry?
> More importantly, short of being an idiot, why would you want to?

Didn't Captain Kirk say it best, "Because it is there." :)
--
"... respect, all good works are not done by only good folk. For here, at the end of all things, we shall do what needs to be done."
--till next time, Jameson Stalanthas Yu -x- <<poetry.dolphins-cove.com>>

and thus Martin Phipps inscribed ...
> On Dec 30, 8:21 pm, Pete B <xxxh@_xsomeething.com> wrote:
>> Well, you can't arrange the world to suit idiots (and they are idiots if
>> they think everybody is the same, especially since you keep going on
>> about how your view is the only one right)
> I think there's a world of difference between "She's too flat" and
> "Her tits are not big enough for my taste". The latter is clearly an
> opinion whereas the former would be considered a mean thing to say to
> Hayden's face. I realize that this is the internet but I always
> imagine when I type something that I am saying it to a person's face,
> as I don't know who may be reading it.

There is that, but also, for me at least if I was there in person, what I say can also have the physical act of "nudge nugde wink wink" type of action that would diffuse the harshness. Of course, that may not play out on usenet, and maybe not in real life, if we weren't close buds already.
--
"... respect, all good works are not done by only good folk. For here, at the end of all things, we shal