Martin Phipps
12-18-2007, 02:03 AM
Ignore her. She's a troll.
Enough said.
Martin
Enough said.
Martin
|
View Full Version : Susan Kennedy A.K.A. Dragonlady Pages :
[1]
2
Martin Phipps 12-18-2007, 02:03 AM Ignore her. She's a troll. Enough said. Martin suzee 12-18-2007, 12:07 PM Martin Phipps wrote: > Ignore her. She's a troll. > > Enough said. > > Martin And you're not....? Dragonlady 12-18-2007, 06:01 PM "suzee" <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote in message news:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > Martin Phipps wrote: >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> Enough said. >> >> Martin > > And you're not....? Does he think I'm embarrassed because he knows my real name? I've been posting as dragonlady for so long, I honestly forgot when I came here that I was using that name.... Martin Phipps 12-18-2007, 08:40 PM On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: > Martin Phipps wrote: > > Ignore her. She's a troll. > > > Enough said. > > And you're not....? Nope. I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. Martin Terry Austin 12-18-2007, 09:17 PM Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- 8eed-03789e9d081d@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >> Martin Phipps wrote: >> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> > Enough said. >> >> And you're not....? > > Nope. In fact, you are. > I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason > doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. Martin Phipps 12-18-2007, 11:10 PM On Dec 19, 10:17 am, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > > > On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: > >> Martin Phipps wrote: > >> > Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >> > Enough said. > > >> And you're not....? > > > Nope. > > In fact, you are. How do you figure? Dragonlady posts insults and then killfiles the person she insults. She then continues to insult them even after she's killfiled them and even starts new threads with the only purpose of baiting somebody. She is clearly not interested in discussion. She's only a troll. Martin Dragonlady 12-18-2007, 11:11 PM "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- > 8eed-03789e9d081d@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >>> >>> > Enough said. >>> >>> And you're not....? >> >> Nope. > > In fact, you are. > >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >> > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be ignored. :P He must be massively frustrated about now. Martin Phipps 12-18-2007, 11:15 PM On Dec 19, 12:11 pm, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > > > > > > > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- > > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > > >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: > >>> Martin Phipps wrote: > >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >>> > Enough said. > > >>> And you're not....? > > >> Nope. > > > In fact, you are. > > >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason > >> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. > > > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. > > I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be ignored. :P This is you ignoring me? > He must be massively frustrated about now. On the contrary. You're proving my point. Martin Dragonlady 12-18-2007, 11:17 PM "suzee" <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote in message news:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > Martin Phipps wrote: >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> Enough said. >> >> Martin > > And you're not....? He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. :P I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to laugh their asses off. suzee 12-18-2007, 11:40 PM Martin Phipps wrote: > On Dec 19, 10:17 am, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >> 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> >>> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>> Enough said. >>>> And you're not....? >>> Nope. >> In fact, you are. > > How do you figure? Dragonlady posts insults and then killfiles the > person she insults. She then continues to insult them even after > she's killfiled them and even starts new threads with the only purpose > of baiting somebody. She is clearly not interested in discussion. > She's only a troll. She does post many messages that discuss the topic at hand. That doesn't go with trollish behavior. Dragonlady 12-18-2007, 11:49 PM "suzee" <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote in message news:fka7b7$ruf$1@aioe.org... > Martin Phipps wrote: >> On Dec 19, 10:17 am, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in >>> news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >>> 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >>> >>>> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>>> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>>> Enough said. >>>>> And you're not....? >>>> Nope. >>> In fact, you are. >> >> How do you figure? Dragonlady posts insults and then killfiles the >> person she insults. She then continues to insult them even after >> she's killfiled them and even starts new threads with the only purpose >> of baiting somebody. She is clearly not interested in discussion. >> She's only a troll. > > She does post many messages that discuss the topic at hand. That doesn't > go with trollish behavior. Yeah, I post insults, in response to insults from a person I see only second hand, in case he hasn't noticed. When he leaves me alone, I'll be glad to return the favor. Like most people, I can behave like a troll if I want to, and have done so many times. Seriously, I don't think Martin is a troll either, but he and I strike sparks off each other, which is why I kill-filed him. However, his invasion of my e-mail was uncalled for and the insults he sends there are also uncalled for. Since he wants to fight, I'm giving him one. But he's not going to do it in my e-mail. If he wants to act like an *******, he can do it in public, where everybody can see him. Terry Austin 12-19-2007, 01:21 AM Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:e4da262b-d4ff-487d-a0ee-4fadf7862473@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > On Dec 19, 10:17 am, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in >> news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >> 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> >> > On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >> >> Martin Phipps wrote: >> >> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> >> > Enough said. >> >> >> And you're not....? >> >> > Nope. >> >> In fact, you are. > > How do you figure? I'm smart that way. > Dragonlady posts insults and then killfiles the > person she insults. So? You're a baby, whining because you're being ignored. Taking it to email is a violation of your terms of sevice, grounds for canceling your account. > She then continues to insult them even after > she's killfiled them and even starts new threads with the only purpose > of baiting somebody. She is clearly not interested in discussion. > She's only a troll. > And you're clearly a stalker. Not to mention fairly stupid. Sucks to be you, kiddo. -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. Terry Austin 12-19-2007, 01:22 AM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mh8mpodetbg71@corp.supernews.com: > Seriously, I don't > think Martin is a troll either, Being something of an expert on the subject of usenet trolls, I disagree. > but he and I strike sparks off each > other, which is why I kill-filed him. However, his invasion of my > e-mail was uncalled for and the insults he sends there are also > uncalled for. Since he wants to fight, I'm giving him one. I'd have thought that Andy broke you of the habit of swallowing that obvious of bait years ago. -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. Terry Austin 12-19-2007, 01:23 AM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mh6fh8gk4h2e1@corp.supernews.com: > > "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in >> news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >> 8eed-03789e9d081d@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> >>> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>> >>>> > Enough said. >>>> >>>> And you're not....? >>> >>> Nope. >> >> In fact, you are. >> >>> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >>> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >>> >> Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. > > I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be ignored. > :P He must be massively frustrated about now. > I'd guess he's cackling at provoking more responses from you. -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. Terry Austin 12-19-2007, 01:23 AM Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:0699c49f-6dc5-482c-bf51-826114101818@b1g2000pra.googlegroups.com: > On Dec 19, 12:11 pm, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> >> >> >> >> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in >> > news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >> > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> >> >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >> >>> Martin Phipps wrote: >> >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> >>> > Enough said. >> >> >>> And you're not....? >> >> >> Nope. >> >> > In fact, you are. >> >> >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >> >> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >> >> > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. >> >> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be ignored. >> :P > > This is you ignoring me? > >> He must be massively frustrated about now. > > On the contrary. You're proving my point. > Did you masturbate while you typed that? I'm guessing you did. You seem like that sort of troll. -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. M. Halbrook 12-19-2007, 04:23 AM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mh8mpodetbg71@corp.supernews.com: > When he leaves me alone, I'll be glad to > return the favor. Why not do us all a favor and leave him alone in teh newsgroup. Martin Phipps 12-19-2007, 04:25 AM On Dec 19, 2:23 pm, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:0699c49f-6dc5-482c-bf51-826114101818@b1g2000pra.googlegroups.com: > > > > > > > On Dec 19, 12:11 pm, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > > spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > > >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in > >> > news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- > >> > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > > >> >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: > >> >>> Martin Phipps wrote: > >> >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >> >>> > Enough said. > > >> >>> And you're not....? > > >> >> Nope. > > >> > In fact, you are. > > >> >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason > >> >> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. > > >> > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. > > >> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be ignored. > >> :P > > > This is you ignoring me? > > >> He must be massively frustrated about now. > > > On the contrary. You're proving my point. > > Did you masturbate while you typed that? I'm guessing you did. You seem > like that sort of troll. You're sounding like a troll yourself. Are you trying to prove you are one? Are you an "expert" on trolls because it takes one to know one? If you are going to (falsely) accuse me of being a troll then you might want to be more civil yourself lest you be accused of being a hypocrit. Martin Martin Phipps 12-19-2007, 04:26 AM On Dec 19, 2:23 pm, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote innews:13mh6fh8gk4h2e1@corp.supernews.com: > > > > > > > > > "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message > >news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > >> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in > >> news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- > >> 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > > >>> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: > >>>> Martin Phipps wrote: > >>>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >>>> > Enough said. > > >>>> And you're not....? > > >>> Nope. > > >> In fact, you are. > > >>> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason > >>> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. > > >> Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. > > > I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be ignored. > > :P He must be massively frustrated about now. > > I'd guess he's cackling at provoking more responses from you. I'm not even reading her posts anymore. I'm bored with her. I've made my point and if you can't see her for the troll she is then that's too bad. It's a sad day in usenet when her sort of behavior is tolerated. Martin Amanda 12-19-2007, 10:45 AM On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > > Martin Phipps wrote: > >> Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >> Enough said. > > >> Martin > > > And you're not....? > > He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. :P > > I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to laugh their > asses off. Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx Dragonlady 12-19-2007, 05:47 PM "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0AE39B762D0taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in > news:13mh8mpodetbg71@corp.supernews.com: > >> Seriously, I don't >> think Martin is a troll either, > > Being something of an expert on the subject of usenet trolls, I disagree. > >> but he and I strike sparks off each >> other, which is why I kill-filed him. However, his invasion of my >> e-mail was uncalled for and the insults he sends there are also >> uncalled for. Since he wants to fight, I'm giving him one. > > I'd have thought that Andy broke you of the habit of swallowing that > obvious of bait years ago. What I learned from Andy was that I get to choose my battles. If he wants to be an *******, he can. But he's going to do it here, and not in my e-mail. If he's too ashamed of the way he acts to do so in public, he shouldn't be acting that way. :P In any case, I've already taken your suggesting and kill-filed him every which way including loose. If he's too stupid to do the same to me, it's not my problem. Dragonlady 12-19-2007, 05:48 PM "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0AE3B27607taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in > news:13mh6fh8gk4h2e1@corp.supernews.com: > >> >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>> Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in >>> news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >>> 8eed-03789e9d081d@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >>> >>>> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>> >>>>> > Enough said. >>>>> >>>>> And you're not....? >>>> >>>> Nope. >>> >>> In fact, you are. >>> >>>> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >>>> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >>>> >>> Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still can. >> >> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be ignored. >> :P He must be massively frustrated about now. >> > I'd guess he's cackling at provoking more responses from you. Do you think he's realized yet that I really am trolling him? Dragonlady 12-19-2007, 05:50 PM "Amanda" <whotheman@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com... > On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> > wrote: >> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >> > Martin Phipps wrote: >> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> >> Enough said. >> >> >> Martin >> >> > And you're not....? >> >> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. :P >> >> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to laugh their >> asses off. > > Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat and ugly > bird who is taking her frustrations out on the > internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid can you be? No 33 Secretary 12-19-2007, 05:58 PM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mj7s8h8qo0r49@corp.supernews.com: > > "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9A0AE39B762D0taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >> news:13mh8mpodetbg71@corp.supernews.com: >> >>> Seriously, I don't >>> think Martin is a troll either, >> >> Being something of an expert on the subject of usenet trolls, I >> disagree. >> >>> but he and I strike sparks off each >>> other, which is why I kill-filed him. However, his invasion >>> of my e-mail was uncalled for and the insults he sends there >>> are also uncalled for. Since he wants to fight, I'm giving >>> him one. >> >> I'd have thought that Andy broke you of the habit of swallowing >> that obvious of bait years ago. > > What I learned from Andy was that I get to choose my battles. > If he wants to be an *******, he can. But he's going to do it > here, and not in my e-mail. Feeding the troll here will not keep him from emailing you. Filing a formal complaint with his ISP will. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump No 33 Secretary 12-19-2007, 05:59 PM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mj7tgm56ivi63@corp.supernews.com: > > "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9A0AE3B27607taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >> news:13mh6fh8gk4h2e1@corp.supernews.com: >> >>> >>> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in >>> message news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>>> Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>> news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >>>> 8eed-03789e9d081d@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >>>> >>>>> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> > Enough said. >>>>>> >>>>>> And you're not....? >>>>> >>>>> Nope. >>>> >>>> In fact, you are. >>>> >>>>> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >>>>> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >>>>> >>>> Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still >>>> can. >>> >>> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be >>> ignored. >>> :P He must be massively frustrated about now. >>> >> I'd guess he's cackling at provoking more responses from you. > > Do you think he's realized yet that I really am trolling him? > Heh. Not if you're pissed. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump No 33 Secretary 12-19-2007, 05:59 PM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: > > "Amanda" <whotheman@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup > s.com... >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>> >>> >> Enough said. >>> >>> >> Martin >>> >>> > And you're not....? >>> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. >>> :P >>> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to >>> laugh their asses off. >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat >> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the >> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx > > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks > anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid > can you be? > Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump Martin Phipps 12-19-2007, 07:02 PM On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: > > > > > > > > > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message > >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup > > s.com... > >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in > >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: > >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >>> >> Enough said. > > >>> >> Martin > > >>> > And you're not....? > > >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. > >>> :P > > >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to > >>> laugh their asses off. > > >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat > >> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the > >> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx > > > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks > > anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid > > can you be? > > Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that > sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. 1) That wasn't me. 2) I'm not a troll. 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with comments about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while you typed that?" The only comments I've ever made have been observations, not insults. If Ms. Kennedy claims that somebody is "clueless" then I will point out that she insulted the speaker without addressing what they had to say, which IS clueless. If she dismisses what somebody had to say as "gobbledygook" then I will lament her apparent illiteracy. If she accuses someone of being a troll she should recognize that she is being a troll herself. She's even admitted "I really am trolling him". (Or are you going to accuse me of faking her address now?) Frankly, she should cease and decist or her service provider will take action. I'm not stupid: I do realize that people will be less polite with people they can't see than when they are talking to people face to face, but there should be limits on what we should tolerate over the internet. Martin Dragonlady 12-19-2007, 08:55 PM "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0B985BF2E52taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in > news:13mj7s8h8qo0r49@corp.supernews.com: > >> >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9A0AE39B762D0taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >>> news:13mh8mpodetbg71@corp.supernews.com: >>> >>>> Seriously, I don't >>>> think Martin is a troll either, >>> >>> Being something of an expert on the subject of usenet trolls, I >>> disagree. >>> >>>> but he and I strike sparks off each >>>> other, which is why I kill-filed him. However, his invasion >>>> of my e-mail was uncalled for and the insults he sends there >>>> are also uncalled for. Since he wants to fight, I'm giving >>>> him one. >>> >>> I'd have thought that Andy broke you of the habit of swallowing >>> that obvious of bait years ago. >> >> What I learned from Andy was that I get to choose my battles. >> If he wants to be an *******, he can. But he's going to do it >> here, and not in my e-mail. > > Feeding the troll here will not keep him from emailing you. Filing > a formal complaint with his ISP will. Already did that. Blocked him from my e-mail too. At the ISP level. Dragonlady 12-19-2007, 08:56 PM "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0B986F5D4FFtaustingmail@216.168.3.64... > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in > news:13mj7tgm56ivi63@corp.supernews.com: > >> >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9A0AE3B27607taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >>> news:13mh6fh8gk4h2e1@corp.supernews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in >>>> message news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>>>> Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>>> news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >>>>> 8eed-03789e9d081d@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>>>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Enough said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you're not....? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>> >>>>> In fact, you are. >>>>> >>>>>> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >>>>>> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >>>>>> >>>>> Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still >>>>> can. >>>> >>>> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be >>>> ignored. >>>> :P He must be massively frustrated about now. >>>> >>> I'd guess he's cackling at provoking more responses from you. >> >> Do you think he's realized yet that I really am trolling him? >> > Heh. Not if you're pissed. I'm not pissed. I haven't really been pissed since posting the second e-mail. After that, it was just a matter of making a fool of him. Dragonlady 12-19-2007, 08:56 PM "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0B988DCB3C2taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in > news:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: > >> >> "Amanda" <whotheman@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup >> s.com... >>> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >>>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >>>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >>>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>> >>>> >> Enough said. >>>> >>>> >> Martin >>>> >>>> > And you're not....? >>>> >>>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. >>>> :P >>>> >>>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to >>>> laugh their asses off. >>> >>> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat >>> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the >>> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >> >> Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks >> anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid >> can you be? >> > Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that > sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. *LOL* If so, he's doomed to disappointment. I've already kill-filed him again. :P Terry Austin 12-20-2007, 12:42 AM Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:632ab65c-7794-4c40-b689-a38436fe9862@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com: > On Dec 19, 2:23 pm, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >> innews:0699c49f-6dc5-482c-bf51-826114101818@b1g2000pra.googlegroups.co >> m: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 19, 12:11 pm, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >> > spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >> >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> >> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in >> >> > news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >> >> > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> >> >> >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Martin Phipps wrote: >> >> >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> >> >>> > Enough said. >> >> >> >>> And you're not....? >> >> >> >> Nope. >> >> >> > In fact, you are. >> >> >> >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >> >> >> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >> >> >> > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still >> >> > can. >> >> >> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be >> >> ignored. >> >> :P >> >> > This is you ignoring me? >> >> >> He must be massively frustrated about now. >> >> > On the contrary. You're proving my point. >> >> Did you masturbate while you typed that? I'm guessing you did. You >> seem like that sort of troll. > > You're sounding like a troll yourself. You're so smart. Your mother must be proud. > Are you trying to prove you > are one? Are you an "expert" on trolls because it takes one to know > one? Y'all are new arond here. > > If you are going to (falsely) accuse me of being a troll then you > might want to be more civil yourself lest you be accused of being a > hypocrit. > You replied. Ergo, I won. -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. Terry Austin 12-20-2007, 12:45 AM Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com: > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup >> > s.com... >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> >>> >> Enough said. >> >> >>> >> Martin >> >> >>> > And you're not....? >> >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. >> >>> :P >> >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to >> >>> laugh their asses off. >> >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat >> >> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the >> >> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >> >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks >> > anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid >> > can you be? >> >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that >> sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. > > 1) That wasn't me. > > 2) I'm not a troll. > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. Two of the three are admitted lies. The third seems likely to be, as well. > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with comments > about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that didn't > involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while you typed that?" If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, you're a ****ing stupid as you look. > > The only comments I've ever made have been observations, not insults. Liar. > If Ms. Kennedy claims that somebody is "clueless" then I will point > out that she insulted the speaker without addressing what they had to > say, which IS clueless. If she dismisses what somebody had to say as > "gobbledygook" then I will lament her apparent illiteracy. If she > accuses someone of being a troll she should recognize that she is > being a troll herself. She's even admitted "I really am trolling > him". (Or are you going to accuse me of faking her address now?) > Frankly, she should cease and decist or her service provider will take > action. None of which changes that fact that you're a troll, and a TOS violating stalker. > > I'm not stupid: Calling you stupid would be an insult to stupid people. You're ******ed. Brain damaged. Not really even human. > I do realize that people will be less polite with > people they can't see than when they are talking to people face to > face, but there should be limits on what we should tolerate over the > internet. > You mean, like, violating your ISPs terms of service to harass someone by email? -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. Terry Austin 12-20-2007, 12:45 AM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mjivbhv10cu0b@corp.supernews.com: > > "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9A0B988DCB3C2taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >> news:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >> >>> >>> "Amanda" <whotheman@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup >>> s.com... >>>> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>>> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>>>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >>>>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >>>>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>> >>>>> >> Enough said. >>>>> >>>>> >> Martin >>>>> >>>>> > And you're not....? >>>>> >>>>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. >>>>> :P >>>>> >>>>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to >>>>> laugh their asses off. >>>> >>>> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat >>>> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the >>>> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >>> >>> Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks >>> anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid >>> can you be? >>> >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that >> sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. > > *LOL* If so, he's doomed to disappointment. I've already kill-filed > him again. :P > S'Okay. I'm gonna have fun with him for days to come. He's my bitch now. -- Terry Austin Beware the other head of science. It bites. Dragonlady 12-20-2007, 12:51 AM "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0BDCCA077BAtaustingmail@216.168.3.64... > Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in > news:632ab65c-7794-4c40-b689-a38436fe9862@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com: > >> On Dec 19, 2:23 pm, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >>> innews:0699c49f-6dc5-482c-bf51-826114101818@b1g2000pra.googlegroups.co >>> m: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Dec 19, 12:11 pm, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>> > spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>> >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> >>> >>news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>> >>> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in >>> >> > news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >>> >> > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >>> >>> >> >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>> >> >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >>> >>> >> >>> > Enough said. >>> >>> >> >>> And you're not....? >>> >>> >> >> Nope. >>> >>> >> > In fact, you are. >>> >>> >> >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason >>> >> >> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. >>> >>> >> > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still >>> >> > can. >>> >>> >> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be >>> >> ignored. >>> >> :P >>> >>> > This is you ignoring me? >>> >>> >> He must be massively frustrated about now. >>> >>> > On the contrary. You're proving my point. >>> >>> Did you masturbate while you typed that? I'm guessing you did. You >>> seem like that sort of troll. >> >> You're sounding like a troll yourself. > > You're so smart. Your mother must be proud. Boy, have you got him hooked. > >> Are you trying to prove you >> are one? Are you an "expert" on trolls because it takes one to know >> one? > > Y'all are new arond here. He doesn't know???? >> >> If you are going to (falsely) accuse me of being a troll then you >> might want to be more civil yourself lest you be accused of being a >> hypocrit. >> > You replied. Ergo, I won. *snicker* Dragonlady 12-20-2007, 12:52 AM "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0BDD5CE5C97taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in > news:13mjivbhv10cu0b@corp.supernews.com: > >> >> "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9A0B988DCB3C2taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >>> news:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >>> >>>> >>>> "Amanda" <whotheman@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>> news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup >>>> s.com... >>>>> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>>>> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>>>>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >>>>>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >>>>>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> >> Enough said. >>>>>> >>>>>> >> Martin >>>>>> >>>>>> > And you're not....? >>>>>> >>>>>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. >>>>>> :P >>>>>> >>>>>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to >>>>>> laugh their asses off. >>>>> >>>>> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat >>>>> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the >>>>> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >>>> >>>> Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks >>>> anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid >>>> can you be? >>>> >>> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that >>> sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. >> >> *LOL* If so, he's doomed to disappointment. I've already kill-filed >> him again. :P >> > S'Okay. I'm gonna have fun with him for days to come. He's my bitch now. I noticed. :P Have fun! Martin Phipps 12-20-2007, 01:59 AM On 12$B7n(B20$BF|(B, $B2<8a(B1$B;~(B42$BJ,(B, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:632ab65c-7794-4c40-b689-a38436fe9862@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com: > > > > > > > On Dec 19, 2:23 pm, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote > >> innews:0699c49f-6dc5-482c-bf51-826114101818@b1g2000pra.googlegroups.co > >> m: > > >> > On Dec 19, 12:11 pm, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > >> > spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > >> >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > >> >>news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > > >> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in > >> >> > news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- > >> >> > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > > >> >> >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: > >> >> >>> Martin Phipps wrote: > >> >> >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >> >> >>> > Enough said. > > >> >> >>> And you're not....? > > >> >> >> Nope. > > >> >> > In fact, you are. > > >> >> >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If reason > >> >> >> doesn't work then let their provider deal with them. > > >> >> > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you still > >> >> > can. > > >> >> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to be > >> >> ignored. > >> >> :P > > >> > This is you ignoring me? > > >> >> He must be massively frustrated about now. > > >> > On the contrary. You're proving my point. > > >> Did you masturbate while you typed that? I'm guessing you did. You > >> seem like that sort of troll. > > > You're sounding like a troll yourself. > > You're so smart. Your mother must be proud. > > > Are you trying to prove you > > are one? Are you an "expert" on trolls because it takes one to know > > one? > > Y'all are new arond here. > > > If you are going to (falsely) accuse me of being a troll then you > > might want to be more civil yourself lest you be accused of being a > > hypocrit. > > You replied. Ergo, I won. Is that all a troll cares about? I wouldn't know. You're the "expert". Martin GDS 12-20-2007, 05:20 AM "Martin Phipps" <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1a32c14c-32d6-4bdc-8d81-539d157ab790@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > Ignore her. She's a troll. > She's not the one posting from googlegroups, troll. G. Martin Phipps 12-20-2007, 06:33 AM On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com: > > > > > > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote > >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: > > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup > >> > s.com... > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >> >>> >> Enough said. > > >> >>> >> Martin > > >> >>> > And you're not....? > > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. > >> >>> :P > > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to > >> >>> laugh their asses off. > > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat > >> >> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the > >> >> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx > > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks > >> > anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid > >> > can you be? > > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that > >> sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. > > > 1) That wasn't me. > > > 2) I'm not a troll. > > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. > > Two of the three are admitted lies. I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're not a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? > The third seems likely to be, as > well. Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfTsaerXpHSXFkUUtjXTKk8 LlZg4jrlsWq88d0NJNU_w This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed to apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come down to. > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with comments > > about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that didn't > > involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while you typed that?" > > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I presume. > you're a ****ing stupid > as you look. I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now officially fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to officially brand you with the status of troll then you are welcome to it. Martin ebrian 12-20-2007, 12:02 PM On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com: > > > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote > > >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: > > > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message > > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googlegroup > > >> > s.com... > > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in > > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: > > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. > > > >> >>> >> Enough said. > > > >> >>> >> Martin > > > >> >>> > And you're not....? > > > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a stalker. > > >> >>> :P > > > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going to > > >> >>> laugh their asses off. > > > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a fat > > >> >> and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the > > >> >> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx > > > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks > > >> > anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How stupid > > >> > can you be? > > > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's that > > >> sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. > > > > 1) That wasn't me. > > > > 2) I'm not a troll. > > > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. > > > Two of the three are admitted lies. > > I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're not a sock > puppet of Ms. Kennedy? > > > The third seems likely to be, as > > well. > > Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 > > http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfTsaerXpH... > > This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I shouldn't > have to point out to people when they are supposed to apologize but > apparently this is what usenet has come down to. > > > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with comments > > > about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that didn't > > > involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while you typed that?" > > > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, > > I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I presume. > > > you're a ****ing stupid > > as you look. > > I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now officially > fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to officially brand you > with the status of troll then you are welcome to it. > > Martin Which university? No 33 Secretary 12-20-2007, 12:28 PM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mk0opf9akc248@corp.supernews.com: > > "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9A0BDD5CE5C97taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >> news:13mjivbhv10cu0b@corp.supernews.com: >> >>> >>> "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in >>> message news:Xns9A0B988DCB3C2taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>>> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in >>>> news:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Amanda" <whotheman@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.googleg >>>>> roup s.com... >>>>>> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>>>>> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>>>>>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >>>>>>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >>>>>>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >>>>>>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Enough said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> Martin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > And you're not....? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a >>>>>>> stalker. >>>>>>> :P >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're going >>>>>>> to laugh their asses off. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a >>>>>> fat and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on the >>>>>> internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >>>>> >>>>> Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who thinks >>>>> anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! How >>>>> stupid can you be? >>>>> >>>> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's >>>> that sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. >>> >>> *LOL* If so, he's doomed to disappointment. I've already >>> kill-filed him again. :P >>> >> S'Okay. I'm gonna have fun with him for days to come. He's my >> bitch now. > > I noticed. :P It's hard to miss. > > Have fun! > I always do. It gets really hysterical when they try to take their harassment to email, when you run your own mail server. I could, for example, just set the server to forward anything from him to their abuse department automatically. I'd never even know it had happened. I could probably have it reply with an insulting message, just to keep him sending them, until his account gets bounced. But that wouldn't be nice. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump No 33 Secretary 12-20-2007, 12:29 PM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mk0mb84t1n27@corp.supernews.com: > > "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9A0BDCCA077BAtaustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in >> news:632ab65c-7794-4c40-b689-a38436fe9862@s8g2000prg.googlegroup >> s.com: >> >>> On Dec 19, 2:23 pm, Terry Austin >>> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >>>> innews:0699c49f-6dc5-482c-bf51-826114101818@b1g2000pra.googleg >>>> roups.co m: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > On Dec 19, 12:11 pm, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>>> > spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>>> >> "Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in >>>> >> message >>>> >>>> >>news:Xns9A0ABA14E3A96taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >>>> >>>> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote in >>>> >> > news:cd58297e-89cc-4343- >>>> >> > 8eed-03789e9d0...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >>>> >>>> >> >> On Dec 19, 1:07 am, suzee <suz...@imbris.com> wrote: >>>> >> >>> Martin Phipps wrote: >>>> >> >>> > Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>> >>>> >> >>> > Enough said. >>>> >>>> >> >>> And you're not....? >>>> >>>> >> >> Nope. >>>> >>>> >> > In fact, you are. >>>> >>>> >> >> I've been dealing with trolls like her for years. If >>>> >> >> reason doesn't work then let their provider deal with >>>> >> >> them. >>>> >>>> >> > Let us know how that works out for you, pookie. If you >>>> >> > still can. >>>> >>>> >> I can tell you how it's going to work out. He's going to >>>> >> be ignored. >>>> >> :P >>>> >>>> > This is you ignoring me? >>>> >>>> >> He must be massively frustrated about now. >>>> >>>> > On the contrary. You're proving my point. >>>> >>>> Did you masturbate while you typed that? I'm guessing you >>>> did. You seem like that sort of troll. >>> >>> You're sounding like a troll yourself. >> >> You're so smart. Your mother must be proud. > > Boy, have you got him hooked. I'll have him arguing with Pee Wee by tomorrow. > >> >>> Are you trying to prove you >>> are one? Are you an "expert" on trolls because it takes one >>> to know one? >> >> Y'all are new arond here. > > He doesn't know???? I suspect there's a lot of things he doesn't know. His *** from a hole in the ground, for instance, thumb test or not. > >>> >>> If you are going to (falsely) accuse me of being a troll then >>> you might want to be more civil yourself lest you be accused >>> of being a hypocrit. >>> >> You replied. Ergo, I won. > > *snicker* > Heh. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump No 33 Secretary 12-20-2007, 12:30 PM ebrian <ebrian@gmail.com> wrote in news:93e7dd55-552f-4b55-bc71-003dd9f7d7c2@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.c om: > On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin >> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >> > innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googleg >> > roups.com: >> >> > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary >> > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote >> > >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >> >> > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.goog >> > >> >legroup >> > >> > s.com... >> > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >> > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >> > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >> > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >> > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >> > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> > >> >>> >> Enough said. >> >> > >> >>> >> Martin >> >> > >> >>> > And you're not....? >> >> > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a >> > >> >>> stalker. >> > >> >>> :P >> >> > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're >> > >> >>> going to laugh their asses off. >> >> > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously >> > >> >> a fat and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out >> > >> >> on the internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >> >> > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who >> > >> > thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she >> > >> > thinks! How stupid can you be? >> >> > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. >> > >> He's that sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. >> >> > > 1) That wasn't me. >> >> > > 2) I'm not a troll. >> >> > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. >> >> > Two of the three are admitted lies. >> >> I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're not >> a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? >> >> > The third seems likely to be, as >> > well. >> >> Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 >> >> http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfTsa >> erXpH... >> >> This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I >> shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed to >> apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come down to. >> >> > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with >> > > comments about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that >> > > didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while >> > > you typed that?" >> >> > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, >> >> I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I presume. >> >> > you're a ****ing stupid >> > as you look. >> >> I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now >> officially fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to >> officially brand you with the status of troll then you are >> welcome to it. >> >> Martin > > Which university? > WTFU, I suspect. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump Dragonlady 12-20-2007, 01:44 PM "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A0C60C26ED92taustingmail@216.168.3.64... > ebrian <ebrian@gmail.com> wrote in > news:93e7dd55-552f-4b55-bc71-003dd9f7d7c2@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.c > om: > >> On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin >>> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >>> > innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googleg >>> > roups.com: >>> >>> > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary >>> > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote >>> > >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >>> >>> > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.goog >>> > >> >legroup >>> > >> > s.com... >>> > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>> > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>> > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >>> > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >>> > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >>> > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>> >>> > >> >>> >> Enough said. >>> >>> > >> >>> >> Martin >>> >>> > >> >>> > And you're not....? >>> >>> > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a >>> > >> >>> stalker. >>> > >> >>> :P >>> >>> > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're >>> > >> >>> going to laugh their asses off. >>> >>> > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously >>> > >> >> a fat and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out >>> > >> >> on the internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >>> >>> > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who >>> > >> > thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she >>> > >> > thinks! How stupid can you be? >>> >>> > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. >>> > >> He's that sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. >>> >>> > > 1) That wasn't me. >>> >>> > > 2) I'm not a troll. >>> >>> > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. >>> >>> > Two of the three are admitted lies. >>> >>> I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're not >>> a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? *lol* I wondered how long it would take him to get to accusing you of being me or vice versa. >>> >>> > The third seems likely to be, as >>> > well. >>> >>> Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfTsa >>> erXpH... >>> >>> This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I >>> shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed to >>> apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come down to. >>> >>> > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with >>> > > comments about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that >>> > > didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while >>> > > you typed that?" >>> >>> > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, >>> >>> I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I presume. FYI: Martin, he achieved full troll status years ago. He trolls for trolls like you, hooks them and laughs up his sleeve while they dangle. Rather like you've been doing. >>> >>> > you're a ****ing stupid >>> > as you look. >>> >>> I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now >>> officially fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to >>> officially brand you with the status of troll then you are >>> welcome to it. >>> >>> Martin >> >> Which university? >> > WTFU, I suspect. I doubt anyplace that's accredited would let him in. No 33 Secretary 12-20-2007, 01:57 PM "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spamblocker@cableone.net> wrote in news:13mldvlkp63hbe4@corp.supernews.com: > > "No 33 Secretary" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in > message news:Xns9A0C60C26ED92taustingmail@216.168.3.64... >> ebrian <ebrian@gmail.com> wrote in >> news:93e7dd55-552f-4b55-bc71-003dd9f7d7c2@d4g2000prg.googlegroup >> s.c om: >> >>> On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin >>>> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >>>> > innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googl >>>> > eg roups.com: >>>> >>>> > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary >>>> > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote >>>> > >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >>>> >>>> > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>>> > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.go >>>> > >> >og legroup >>>> > >> > s.com... >>>> > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >>>> > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >>>> > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >>>> > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >>>> > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >>>> > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >>>> >>>> > >> >>> >> Enough said. >>>> >>>> > >> >>> >> Martin >>>> >>>> > >> >>> > And you're not....? >>>> >>>> > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a >>>> > >> >>> stalker. >>>> > >> >>> :P >>>> >>>> > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're >>>> > >> >>> going to laugh their asses off. >>>> >>>> > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So >>>> > >> >> obviously a fat and ugly bird who is taking her >>>> > >> >> frustrations out on the internet................FAT >>>> > >> >> OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >>>> >>>> > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who >>>> > >> > thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she >>>> > >> > thinks! How stupid can you be? >>>> >>>> > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. >>>> > >> He's that sort, especially now that you've killfiled >>>> > >> him. >>>> >>>> > > 1) That wasn't me. >>>> >>>> > > 2) I'm not a troll. >>>> >>>> > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. >>>> >>>> > Two of the three are admitted lies. >>>> >>>> I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're >>>> not a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? > > *lol* I wondered how long it would take him to get to accusing > you of being me or vice versa. Troll tactic #17. Used it many times, myself. > >>>> >>>> > The third seems likely to be, as >>>> > well. >>>> >>>> Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 >>>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfT >>>> sa erXpH... >>>> >>>> This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I >>>> shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed >>>> to apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come down >>>> to. >>>> >>>> > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself >>>> > > with comments about me like "he's ever been to getting >>>> > > laid that didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you >>>> > > masturbate while you typed that?" >>>> >>>> > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, >>>> >>>> I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I >>>> presume. > > FYI: Martin, he achieved full troll status years ago. No ****. > He > trolls for trolls like you, hooks them and laughs up his sleeve > while they dangle. > > Rather like you've been doing. I'll stand on my record. He'll dangle on the hook. > >>>> >>>> > you're a ****ing stupid >>>> > as you look. >>>> >>>> I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now >>>> officially fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to >>>> officially brand you with the status of troll then you are >>>> welcome to it. >>>> >>>> Martin >>> >>> Which university? >>> >> WTFU, I suspect. > > I doubt anyplace that's accredited would let him in. > Heh. The "WFT" part would stand for "What The ****". Which is to say, the phrase that defines his entire existence. "What the ****? How can someone be that stupid and be able to breath and walk at the same time?" -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump No 33 Secretary 12-20-2007, 02:03 PM Martin Phipps <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1c555994-faa5-4ac0-ae18-be1963db3ed1@d21g2000prf.googlegroups. com: > On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >> innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googlegro >> ups.com: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary >> > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote >> >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >> >> >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.google >> >> >group >> >> > s.com... >> >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >> >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >> >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >> >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >> >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >> >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> >> >>> >> Enough said. >> >> >> >>> >> Martin >> >> >> >>> > And you're not....? >> >> >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a >> >> >>> stalker. >> >> >>> :P >> >> >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're >> >> >>> going to laugh their asses off. >> >> >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously a >> >> >> fat and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out on >> >> >> the internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >> >> >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who >> >> > thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she thinks! >> >> > How stupid can you be? >> >> >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. He's >> >> that sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. >> >> > 1) That wasn't me. >> >> > 2) I'm not a troll. >> >> > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. >> >> Two of the three are admitted lies. > > I'm not the liar, idiot. Yes, you are a liar, and an idiot. And very poor at grammar and punctuation, too, apprently. > How do any of we know that you're not > a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? Any of we? Can someone translate that in to a non-****** language? (I've noted that, when a loon-troll starts to get *really* pissed off at how poorly they're doing, they inevitably start to lose their command of the language.) > >> The third seems likely to be, as >> well. > > Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 "This person has not created a profile." I have no idea what your point is. Is this "Amanda" person somehow related to how ****ing stupid you are? > > http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfTsae > rXpHSXFkUUtjXTKk8LlZg4jrlsWq88d0NJNU_w > > This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. This is the part where you stop begging to suck my dick, too. But we both know you're not going to. That you *can't* stop yourself, you little pervert. > I > shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed to > apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come down to. Y'all are new around here, aren't you? The internet is powered by stupidity and Mountain Dew. > >> > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with >> > comments about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that >> > didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while >> > you typed that?" >> >> If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, > > I apologize. I find your sincerity somewhat suspect. Not as suspect as your intelligence, of course, but still. > You were aiming for full troll status I presume. You're on my hook, certainly. > >> you're a ****ing stupid >> as you look. > > I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. What university? Where is your PhD from? If you do not respond, you will be branded a liar forever. But then, we all know you're a liar anyway. You've admitted it, many times. > and you've now > officially fallen beneath my notice. Then why are you typing out a reply right now? > If you want people to > officially brand you with the status of troll then you are > welcome to it. > No matter how blatant I get, you'll still jump on the hook of your own free will. You're my bitch. You can't live without my attention. It really *sucks* to be you. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump ebrian 12-20-2007, 03:30 PM On Dec 20, 12:30 pm, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > ebrian <ebr...@gmail.com> wrote innews:93e7dd55-552f-4b55-bc71-003dd9f7d7c2@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.c > om: > > > > > On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > >> On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin > >> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote > >> > innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.googleg > >> > roups.com: > > >> > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary > >> > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote > >> > >> innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: > > >> > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message > >> > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.goog > >> > >> >legroup > >> > >> > s.com... > >> > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > >> > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > >> > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in > >> > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > >> > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: > >> > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >> > >> >>> >> Enough said. > > >> > >> >>> >> Martin > > >> > >> >>> > And you're not....? > > >> > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now a > >> > >> >>> stalker. > >> > >> >>> :P > > >> > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're > >> > >> >>> going to laugh their asses off. > > >> > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So obviously > >> > >> >> a fat and ugly bird who is taking her frustrations out > >> > >> >> on the internet................FAT OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx > > >> > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who > >> > >> > thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she > >> > >> > thinks! How stupid can you be? > > >> > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. > >> > >> He's that sort, especially now that you've killfiled him. > > >> > > 1) That wasn't me. > > >> > > 2) I'm not a troll. > > >> > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. > > >> > Two of the three are admitted lies. > > >> I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're not > >> a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? > > >> > The third seems likely to be, as > >> > well. > > >> Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 > > >>http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfTsa > >> erXpH... > > >> This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I > >> shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed to > >> apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come down to. > > >> > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself with > >> > > comments about me like "he's ever been to getting laid that > >> > > didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you masturbate while > >> > > you typed that?" > > >> > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, > > >> I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I presume. > > >> > you're a ****ing stupid > >> > as you look. > > >> I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now > >> officially fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to > >> officially brand you with the status of troll then you are > >> welcome to it. > > >> Martin > > > Which university? > > WTFU, I suspect. > > -- > Terry Austin > > "There's no law west of the internet." > - Nick Stump Seriously though, I'd really like to know which university Martin Phipps is a professor at. No 33 Secretary 12-20-2007, 04:11 PM ebrian <ebrian@gmail.com> wrote in news:7a36bd61-91fa-4c11-98c0-24239fc025eb@d27g2000prf.googlegroups. com: > On Dec 20, 12:30 pm, No 33 Secretary > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ebrian <ebr...@gmail.com> wrote >> innews:93e7dd55-552f-4b55-bc71-003dd9f7d7c2@d4g2000prg.googlegro >> ups.c om: >> >> >> >> > On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> >> > wrote: >> >> On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin >> >> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >> >> > innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.goog >> >> > leg roups.com: >> >> >> > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary >> >> > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> >> >> > >> wrote innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: >> >> >> > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> >> > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.g >> >> > >> >oog legroup >> >> > >> > s.com... >> >> > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady >> >> > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: >> >> > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in >> >> > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... >> >> > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: >> >> > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. >> >> >> > >> >>> >> Enough said. >> >> >> > >> >>> >> Martin >> >> >> > >> >>> > And you're not....? >> >> >> > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now >> >> > >> >>> a stalker. >> >> > >> >>> :P >> >> >> > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're >> >> > >> >>> going to laugh their asses off. >> >> >> > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So >> >> > >> >> obviously a fat and ugly bird who is taking her >> >> > >> >> frustrations out on the internet................FAT >> >> > >> >> OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx >> >> >> > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who >> >> > >> > thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she >> >> > >> > thinks! How stupid can you be? >> >> >> > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. >> >> > >> He's that sort, especially now that you've killfiled >> >> > >> him. >> >> >> > > 1) That wasn't me. >> >> >> > > 2) I'm not a troll. >> >> >> > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. >> >> >> > Two of the three are admitted lies. >> >> >> I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're >> >> not a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? >> >> >> > The third seems likely to be, as >> >> > well. >> >> >> Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 >> >> >>http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfT >> >>sa >> >> erXpH... >> >> >> This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I >> >> shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed >> >> to apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come >> >> down to. >> >> >> > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself >> >> > > with comments about me like "he's ever been to getting >> >> > > laid that didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you >> >> > > masturbate while you typed that?" >> >> >> > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, >> >> >> I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I >> >> presume. >> >> >> > you're a ****ing stupid >> >> > as you look. >> >> >> I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now >> >> officially fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to >> >> officially brand you with the status of troll then you are >> >> welcome to it. >> >> >> Martin >> >> > Which university? >> >> WTFU, I suspect. >> >> -- >> Terry Austin >> >> "There's no law west of the internet." >> - Nick Stump > > Seriously though, I'd really like to know which university > Martin Phipps is a professor at. > So would Martin. -- Terry Austin "There's no law west of the internet." - Nick Stump ebrian 12-20-2007, 04:31 PM On Dec 20, 4:11 pm, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > ebrian <ebr...@gmail.com> wrote innews:7a36bd61-91fa-4c11-98c0-24239fc025eb@d27g2000prf.googlegroups. > com: > > > > > On Dec 20, 12:30 pm, No 33 Secretary > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ebrian <ebr...@gmail.com> wrote > >> innews:93e7dd55-552f-4b55-bc71-003dd9f7d7c2@d4g2000prg.googlegro > >> ups.c om: > > >> > On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin > >> >> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote > >> >> > innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.goog > >> >> > leg roups.com: > > >> >> > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary > >> >> > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> "Dragonlady" <dragonlady spambloc...@cableone.net> > >> >> > >> wrote innews:13mj80r3c0p1kc9@corp.supernews.com: > > >> >> > >> > "Amanda" <whothe...@btinternet.com> wrote in message > >> >> > >> >news:e8f5e3b3-6b7c-4b45-9513-f50aa28e22f4@p69g2000hsa.g > >> >> > >> >oog legroup > >> >> > >> > s.com... > >> >> > >> >> On 19 Dec, 04:17, "Dragonlady" <dragonlady > >> >> > >> >> spambloc...@cableone.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> "suzee" <suz...@imbris.com> wrote in > >> >> > >> >>> messagenews:fk8ung$aeh$1@aioe.org... > >> >> > >> >>> > Martin Phipps wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> >> Ignore her. She's a troll. > > >> >> > >> >>> >> Enough said. > > >> >> > >> >>> >> Martin > > >> >> > >> >>> > And you're not....? > > >> >> > >> >>> He's graduated. According to my brother, he's now > >> >> > >> >>> a stalker. > >> >> > >> >>> :P > > >> >> > >> >>> I really hope he does contact my provider. They're > >> >> > >> >>> going to laugh their asses off. > > >> >> > >> >> Thing is that he is totally right though. So > >> >> > >> >> obviously a fat and ugly bird who is taking her > >> >> > >> >> frustrations out on the internet................FAT > >> >> > >> >> OUT OF SHAPE DOG.xxx > > >> >> > >> > Oh look! It's yet another stupid troll, and one who > >> >> > >> > thinks anybody who doesn't know her cares what she > >> >> > >> > thinks! How stupid can you be? > > >> >> > >> Another? More likely the same one, using a sock puppet. > >> >> > >> He's that sort, especially now that you've killfiled > >> >> > >> him. > > >> >> > > 1) That wasn't me. > > >> >> > > 2) I'm not a troll. > > >> >> > > 3) Ms. Kennedy is the troll. > > >> >> > Two of the three are admitted lies. > > >> >> I'm not the liar, idiot. How do any of we know that you're > >> >> not a sock puppet of Ms. Kennedy? > > >> >> > The third seems likely to be, as > >> >> > well. > > >> >> Check out "Amanda's" profile. It dates back to April, 2000 > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=_Qg5XhgAAADfT > >> >>sa > >> >> erXpH... > > >> >> This is the part where you are supposed to apologize. I > >> >> shouldn't have to point out to people when they are supposed > >> >> to apologize but apparently this is what usenet has come > >> >> down to. > > >> >> > > 4) You're dangerously close to being a troll yourself > >> >> > > with comments about me like "he's ever been to getting > >> >> > > laid that didn't involve a farm animal" and "Did you > >> >> > > masturbate while you typed that?" > > >> >> > If you think I'm only *close* to being a troll, > > >> >> I apologize. You were aiming for full troll status I > >> >> presume. > > >> >> > you're a ****ing stupid > >> >> > as you look. > > >> >> I'm a university professor with a Ph.D. and you've now > >> >> officially fallen beneath my notice. If you want people to > >> >> officially brand you with the status of troll then you are > >> >> welcome to it. > > >> >> Martin > > >> > Which university? > > >> WTFU, I suspect. > > >> -- > >> Terry Austin > > >> "There's no law west of the internet." > >> - Nick Stump > > > Seriously though, I'd really like to know which university > > Martin Phipps is a professor at. > > So would Martin. > > -- > Terry Austin > > "There's no law west of the internet." > - Nick Stump Stop replying, I want him to see my question. One day I am going to have kids who need to go to university. I need to know which schools to avoid. This is a serious question. No 33 Secretary 12-20-2007, 05:29 PM ebrian <ebrian@gmail.com> wrote in news:d5cf32f5-2f48-4073-b22f-3562208e2008@q77g2000hsh.googlegroups. com: > On Dec 20, 4:11 pm, No 33 Secretary > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ebrian <ebr...@gmail.com> wrote >> innews:7a36bd61-91fa-4c11-98c0-24239fc025eb@d27g2000prf.googlegr >> oups. com: >> >> >> >> > On Dec 20, 12:30 pm, No 33 Secretary >> > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> ebrian <ebr...@gmail.com> wrote >> >> innews:93e7dd55-552f-4b55-bc71-003dd9f7d7c2@d4g2000prg.google >> >> gro ups.c om: >> >> >> > On Dec 20, 6:33 am, Martin Phipps >> >> > <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Dec 20, 1:45 pm, Terry Austin >> >> >> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Martin Phipps <martinphip...@yahoo.com> wrote >> >> >> > innews:29602afb-d110-42fe-80d0-e9043977a56d@t1g2000pra.g >> >> >> > oog leg roups.com: >> >> >> >> > > On Dec 20, 6:59 am, No 33 Secretary >> >> >> > > <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> |