On Dec 12 2007, 3:50 pm, No 33 Secretary
<terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Matthias Warkus <War...@students.uni-marburg.de> wrote innews:fjprft$2blc$1@news.nnrp.de:
>
> > You argue that there was a period during the French revolution
> > where there was no society?
>
> If you're arguing that French society did not break down around
> that time, you're a ******.

If your basic argument against everything is "you're a ******," then
you're probably at the very least "logically challenged."

- Jordan

JSBassior2007@gmail.com wrote:

> On Dec 12 2007, 3:50 pm, No 33 Secretary

> If your basic argument against everything is "you're a ******," then
> you're probably at the very least "logically challenged."

The programmers need to do some work on the BassiorBot so that it
doesn't reply to six-week-old messages.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Default User wrote:

> JSBassior2007@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Dec 12 2007, 3:50 pm, No 33 Secretary
>
>> If your basic argument against everything is "you're a ******," then
>> you're probably at the very least "logically challenged."
>
> The programmers need to do some work on the BassiorBot so that it
> doesn't reply to six-week-old messages.

Yeah, I was wondering what was going on for a second there ...

--
Erik Max Francis && max@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
Human love is often but the encounter of two weaknesses.
-- Francois Mauriac

JSBassior2007@gmail.com wrote in
news:ec83b2fa-1434-45f2-8bca-6c6b1cdba438@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com:

> On Dec 12 2007, 3:50 pm, No 33 Secretary
> <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Warkus <War...@students.uni-marburg.de> wrote
>> innews:fjprft$2blc$
> 1@news.nnrp.de:
>>
>> > You argue that there was a period during the French revolution
>> > where there was no society?
>>
>> If you're arguing that French society did not break down around
>> that time, you're a ******.
>
> If your basic argument against everything is "you're a ******," then
> you're probably at the very least "logically challenged."
>
Since I do not, in fact, argue against *everything* on that basis, you are
dishonest. And a ******.

But that's hardly anything new.

Are you claiming that French society did not break down? Simple yes or no
question. But you won't answer, will you?

--
Terry Austin
"Dude, we're all your bitch, but only Ken's wearing the juice."
- tussock

"Just throw a rock, and what screams will probably be a moron."
- Elvis (no, not that Elvis)

On Feb 1, 12:02 pm, Erik Max Francis <m...@alcyone.com> wrote:
> Default User wrote:
> > JSBassior2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> On Dec 12 2007, 3:50 pm, No 33 Secretary
>
> >> If your basic argument against everything is "you're a ******," then
> >> you're probably at the very least "logically challenged."
>
> > The programmers need to do some work on the BassiorBot so that it
> > doesn't reply to six-week-old messages.
>
> Yeah, I was wondering what was going on for a second there ...

I have a life apart from posting on rec.arts.sf.written?

But it's nice to see people supporting the "you're a ******" mode of
discourse. Shows me thing haven't changed, here.

- Jordan

JSBassior2007@gmail.com wrote in news:b5862273-8a3b-48a4-b48d-
32e6eae1b2ba@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com:

> On Feb 1, 12:02 pm, Erik Max Francis <m...@alcyone.com> wrote:
>> Default User wrote:
>> > JSBassior2...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> On Dec 12 2007, 3:50 pm, No 33 Secretary
>>
>> >> If your basic argument against everything is "you're a ******," then
>> >> you're probably at the very least "logically challenged."
>>
>> > The programmers need to do some work on the BassiorBot so that it
>> > doesn't reply to six-week-old messages.
>>
>> Yeah, I was wondering what was going on for a second there ...
>
> I have a life apart from posting on rec.arts.sf.written?

Apparently not, if you have time for six week old messages.
>
> But it's nice to see people supporting the "you're a ******" mode of
> discourse. Shows me thing haven't changed, here.
>
Indeed, things haven't changed. You *are* still a ******.

--
Terry Austin
"Dude, we're all your bitch, but only Ken's wearing the juice."
- tussock

"Just throw a rock, and what screams will probably be a moron."
- Elvis (no, not that Elvis)