View Full Version : Science Disproves Evolution


Pahu78@gmail.com
02-27-2008, 08:48 AM
Poynting-Robertson Effect

Dust particles larger than about a 100,000th of a centimeter in
diameter form a large disk-shaped cloud that orbits the Sun between
the orbits of Venus and the asteroid belt. This cloud produces
zodiacal light. Forces acting on these particles should spiral most of
them into the Sun in less than 10,000 years. (This is called the
Poynting-Robertson effect.) Known forces and sources of replenishment
cannot maintain this cloud, so the solar system is probably less than
10,000 years old.

This is how the Poynting-Robertson effect works: Rain falling on a
speeding car tends to strike the front of the car and slow it down
slightly. Similarly, the Sun's rays that strike particles orbiting the
Sun tend to slow them down, causing them to spiral into the Sun. Thus,
the Sun's radiation and gravity act as a giant vacuum cleaner that
pulls in about 100,000 tons of nearby micrometeoroids per day.
Disintegrating comets and asteroids add dust at less than half the
rate at which it is being destroyed (a).

A disintegrating comet becomes a cluster of particles called a meteor
stream. The Poynting-Robertson effect causes smaller particles in a
meteor stream to spiral into the Sun more rapidly than larger
particles. After about 10,000 years, these orbits should be visibly
segregated by particle size. Because this segregation is generally not
seen, meteor streams are probably a recent phenomenon (b).

Huge quantities of microscopic dust particles also have been
discovered around some stars (c). Yet, according to the theory of
stellar evolution, those stars are many millions of years old, so that
dust should have been removed by stellar wind and the Poynting-
Robertson effect. Until some process is discovered that continually
resupplies vast amounts of dust, one should consider whether the
"millions of years" are imaginary.

a. Steidl, The Earth, the Stars, and the Bible, pp. 60-61.

Harold S. Slusher and Stephen J. Robertson, The Age of the Solar
System: A Study of the Poynting-Robertson Effect and Extinction of
Interplanetary Dust, ICR Technical Monograph No. 6, revised edition
(El Cajon, California: Institute for Creation Research, 1978).

b. Stanley P. Wyatt Jr. and Fred L. Whipple, "The Poynting-Robertson
Effect on Meteor Orbits," The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 3, January
1950, pp. 134-141.

Ron Cowen, "Meteorites: To Stream or Not to Stream," Science News,
Vol. 142, 1 August 1992, p. 71.

c. David A. Weintraub, "Comets in Collision," Nature, Vol. 351, 6 June
1991, pp. 440-441.

For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by
evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15
years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of
100!

Evolution requires an old Earth, an old solar system, and an old
universe. Nearly all informed evolutionists will admit that without
billions of years their theory is dead. Yet, hiding the "origins
question" behind a vast veil of time makes the unsolvable problems of
evolution difficult for scientists to see and laymen to imagine. Our
media and textbooks have implied for over a century that these almost
unimaginable ages are correct. Rarely do people examine the shaky
assumptions and growing body of contrary evidence. Therefore, most
people today almost instinctively believe that the Earth and universe
are billions of years old. Sometimes, these people are disturbed, at
least initially, when they see the evidence.

Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar
system are young--possibly less than 10,000 years old.

http://www.creationscience.com/

spike1@freenet.co.uk
02-27-2008, 11:25 AM
Pahu78@gmail.com did eloquently scribble:
> Poynting-Robertson Effect

> Dust particles larger than about a 100,000th of a centimeter in
> diameter form a large disk-shaped cloud that orbits the Sun between
> the orbits of Venus and the asteroid belt. This cloud produces
> zodiacal light. Forces acting on these particles should spiral most of
> them into the Sun in less than 10,000 years. (This is called the
> Poynting-Robertson effect.) Known forces and sources of replenishment
> cannot maintain this cloud, so the solar system is probably less than
> 10,000 years old.

What a load of old tosh.

> This is how the Poynting-Robertson effect works: Rain falling on a
> speeding car tends to strike the front of the car and slow it down
> slightly. Similarly, the Sun's rays that strike particles orbiting the
> Sun tend to slow them down, causing them to spiral into the Sun.

Apart from the fact the particles from the sun are actually travelling at
right angles to the dust's orbit perhaps? and thus push the dust particles
outwards? Add to that the fact the solar energy is not working against the
dust's orbit, why would it slow the particles down?

You are a terrible proponent of creationism.

> A disintegrating comet becomes a cluster of particles called a meteor
> stream. The Poynting-Robertson effect causes smaller particles in a
> meteor stream to spiral into the Sun more rapidly than larger
> particles.

Rubbish.

> For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by
> evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15
> years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of
> 100!

Science is wonderful isn't it? Things change as more is learned.
Trouble is, nothing in 2000 year old fables is new so nothing changes in
them. Utterly useless clerical propoganda.

> Evolution requires an old Earth, an old solar system, and an old
> universe.

Which all evidence points to...
You're like a parrot, you don't actually understand any of the crap you post
do you?

> Nearly all informed evolutionists will admit that without
> billions of years their theory is dead. Yet, hiding the "origins
> question" behind a vast veil of time makes the unsolvable problems of
> evolution difficult for scientists to see and laymen to imagine. Our
> media and textbooks have implied for over a century that these almost
> unimaginable ages are correct. Rarely do people examine the shaky
> assumptions and growing body of contrary evidence.

Like what exactly? The bad science you continually post?

> Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar
> system are young--possibly less than 10,000 years old.

Bullshit, yet again.
--
__________________________________________________ ____________________________
| spike1@freenet.co.uk | "I'm alive!!! I can touch! I can taste! |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| I can SMELL!!! KRYTEN!!! Unpack Rachel and |
| in | get out the puncture repair kit!" |
| Computer Science | Arnold Judas Rimmer- Red Dwarf |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anybody
02-27-2008, 03:16 PM
In article <mgfg95-3tm.ln1@ridcully.ntlworld.com>, spike1@freenet.co.uk
wrote:

> Pahu78@gmail.com did eloquently scribble:
> > Poynting-Robertson Effect
>
> > Dust particles larger than about a 100,000th of a centimeter in
> > diameter form a large disk-shaped cloud that orbits the Sun between
> > the orbits of Venus and the asteroid belt. This cloud produces
> > zodiacal light. Forces acting on these particles should spiral most of
> > them into the Sun in less than 10,000 years. (This is called the
> > Poynting-Robertson effect.) Known forces and sources of replenishment
> > cannot maintain this cloud, so the solar system is probably less than
> > 10,000 years old.
>
> What a load of old tosh.

Just ignore the moron troll.

No Person known
02-27-2008, 08:03 PM
Science will only get you so far, the rest is a matter of faith, no matter
what you believe.

Anim8rFSK
02-27-2008, 10:33 PM
In article <Xns9A51CC1A2B5F9noplacelikethepastya@71.79.15.162>,
No Person known <noplacelikethepast@yahhoo.com> wrote:

> Science will only get you so far, the rest is a matter of faith, no matter
> what you believe.

Except for the 'bullshit' part, sure.

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg

Stile4aly
03-02-2008, 10:46 PM
On Feb 27, 6:48 am, Pah...@gmail.com wrote:
> Poynting-Robertson Effect
>
> Dust particles larger than about a 100,000th of a centimeter in
> diameter form a large disk-shaped cloud that orbits the Sun between
> the orbits of Venus and the asteroid belt. This cloud produces
> zodiacal light. Forces acting on these particles should spiral most of
> them into the Sun in less than 10,000 years. (This is called the
> Poynting-Robertson effect.) Known forces and sources of replenishment
> cannot maintain this cloud, so the solar system is probably less than
> 10,000 years old.
>
> This is how the Poynting-Robertson effect works: Rain falling on a
> speeding car tends to strike the front of the car and slow it down
> slightly. Similarly, the Sun's rays that strike particles orbiting the
> Sun tend to slow them down, causing them to spiral into the Sun. Thus,
> the Sun's radiation and gravity act as a giant vacuum cleaner that
> pulls in about 100,000 tons of nearby micrometeoroids per day.
> Disintegrating comets and asteroids add dust at less than half the
> rate at which it is being destroyed (a).
>
> A disintegrating comet becomes a cluster of particles called a meteor
> stream. The Poynting-Robertson effect causes smaller particles in a
> meteor stream to spiral into the Sun more rapidly than larger
> particles. After about 10,000 years, these orbits should be visibly
> segregated by particle size. Because this segregation is generally not
> seen, meteor streams are probably a recent phenomenon (b).
>
> Huge quantities of microscopic dust particles also have been
> discovered around some stars (c). Yet, according to the theory of
> stellar evolution, those stars are many millions of years old, so that
> dust should have been removed by stellar wind and the Poynting-
> Robertson effect. Until some process is discovered that continually
> resupplies vast amounts of dust, one should consider whether the
> "millions of years" are imaginary.
>
> a. Steidl, The Earth, the Stars, and the Bible, pp. 60-61.
>
> Harold S. Slusher and Stephen J. Robertson, The Age of the Solar
> System: A Study of the Poynting-Robertson Effect and Extinction of
> Interplanetary Dust, ICR Technical Monograph No. 6, revised edition
> (El Cajon, California: Institute for Creation Research, 1978).
>
> b. Stanley P. Wyatt Jr. and Fred L. Whipple, "The Poynting-Robertson
> Effect on Meteor Orbits," The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 3, January
> 1950, pp. 134-141.
>
> Ron Cowen, "Meteorites: To Stream or Not to Stream," Science News,
> Vol. 142, 1 August 1992, p. 71.
>
> c. David A. Weintraub, "Comets in Collision," Nature, Vol. 351, 6 June
> 1991, pp. 440-441.
>
> For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by
> evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15
> years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of
> 100!
>
> Evolution requires an old Earth, an old solar system, and an old
> universe. Nearly all informed evolutionists will admit that without
> billions of years their theory is dead. Yet, hiding the "origins
> question" behind a vast veil of time makes the unsolvable problems of
> evolution difficult for scientists to see and laymen to imagine. Our
> media and textbooks have implied for over a century that these almost
> unimaginable ages are correct. Rarely do people examine the shaky
> assumptions and growing body of contrary evidence. Therefore, most
> people today almost instinctively believe that the Earth and universe
> are billions of years old. Sometimes, these people are disturbed, at
> least initially, when they see the evidence.
>
> Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar
> system are young--possibly less than 10,000 years old.
>
> http://www.creationscience.com/

As usual, you're wrong.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE281.html