TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:

> The One True Roger wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>
>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>
>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>> been
>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>> is find out where.
>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>
>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>> on
>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>
>>> <giggle>
>>>
>>
>>
>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>
>
> SECONDED!
>
> (if there is time left to nominate)

This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
vote and nominate.

AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.

[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
galactica.]

The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
discouraged.

http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4

"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
discouraged."

Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
--
The Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler of AUK
http://www.club127.net/auk/

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:39:37 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks,
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <wrangler@caballista.org>
bloviated:

>TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>
>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>
>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>> been
>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>> is find out where.
>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>
>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>> on
>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>
>>>> <giggle>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>
>>
>> SECONDED!
>>
>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>
>This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>vote and nominate.
>
>AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>
>[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>galactica.]
>
>The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>discouraged.
>
>http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>
>"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>discouraged."
>
>Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.

If I might add, *we* of AUK actually like Kenny Kakes (an AUK moniker)
and while he is a raging nutbar that froths some of the most illucid
screed ever seen, he is not a bad guy. That these ****stumps want to
try to ruin his business because they are in some sort of dick
flapping contest with him says much about just what kind of pathetic,
mouth breathing, limp thinking, scum came out of the Starwars Lite
newsgroup.

It would be a sad day for AUK to devolve into a form that would accept
those as fellow denizens.

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
> TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
> news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>
>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>
>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>> been
>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>> is find out where.
>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>
>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>> on
>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>
>>>> <giggle>
>>>>
>>>
>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>
>> SECONDED!
>>
>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>
> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
> has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
> losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
> group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
> froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
> vote and nominate.
>
> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>
> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
> galactica.]
>
> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
> discouraged.
>
> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>
> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
> discouraged."
>
> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.

Understood.

please accept(or not) my humblest apologies for causing any disruption
or inconvenience or anything else I may have unintentionally caused.

Kevin (TNKev)

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:39:37 +0000 (UTC), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler <wrangler@caballista.org> wrote:

>TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>
>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>
>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>> been
>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>> is find out where.
>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>
>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>> on
>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>
>>>> <giggle>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>
>>
>> SECONDED!
>>
>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>
>This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>vote and nominate.
>
>AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>
>[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>galactica.]
>
>The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>discouraged.
>
>http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>
>"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>discouraged."
>
>Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.

*applause*

A wise ruling FNVW. Outer filth can and always should **** off out of
AUK. This has always been the standard and should continue to be so.

Jade

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:09:06 -0600, TNKev <thekultofkent@yahoo.com>
wrote:

<snip>
>> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>> discouraged."
>>
>> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>
>Understood.
>
>please accept(or not) my humblest apologies for causing any disruption
>or inconvenience or anything else I may have unintentionally caused.

You been very politely told to **** off from AUK.
Be a courteous fellow and do that.

mmm'kay?


--
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)

http://www.insurgent.org/

#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top *******s on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:39:37 +0000, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
wrote:

> TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
> news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>
>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>
>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>> been
>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>> is find out where.
>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>
>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>> on
>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>
>>>> <giggle>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>
>>
>> SECONDED!
>>
>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>
> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
> has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
> losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
> group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
> froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
> vote and nominate.
>
> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>
> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
> galactica.]
>
> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
> discouraged.
>
> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>
> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
> discouraged."
>
> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.

Well put FNVW!!!

"Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte.net> wrote in message

> Well put FNVW!!!
>
Feel a little pressure on your *** hole, Meat Spatula?

Meh...heh...heh...heh...

Number One

"K. A. Cannon" <kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote in message

> You been very politely told to **** off from AUK.
> Be a courteous fellow and do that.

He don't have to "Go" nowhere, **** Face!

> mmm'kay?
>
mmm'no!
--

Number One

R. Vince Lamb, aka Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler, wrote:
>TNKev wrote:
>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>
>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>> been
>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>> is find out where.
>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>
>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>> on
>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>
>>>> <giggle>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>
>>
>> SECONDED!
>>
>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>
>This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>vote and nominate.
>
>AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>
>[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>galactica.]
>
>The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>discouraged.
>
>http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>
>"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>discouraged."
>
>Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.

That's some impressive moral rectitude, Vince.

Where'd you find it?

"miguel" <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7ales3t2vu6nbe88tuvk8pd474b5b7dgg2@4ax.com...
> R. Vince Lamb, aka Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler, wrote:
> >TNKev wrote:
> >> The One True Roger wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
> >>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom
wall:
> >>>
> >>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> >>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy
Joyous.
> >>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs
him
> >>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not,
because
> >>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so
ever
> >>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast
the
> >>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
> >>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane
HAS
> >>>> been
> >>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
> >>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know.
Your
> >>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to
do
> >>>> is find out where.
> >>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
> >>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
> >>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
> >>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny
noises
> >>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
> >>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my
machine
> >>>> on ALL of our machines?
> >>>>
> >>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep
scan
> >>>> on
> >>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for
all
> >>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
> >>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
> >>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
> >>>>
> >>>> <giggle>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
> >>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
> >>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
> >>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
> >>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
> >>>
> >>
> >> SECONDED!
> >>
> >> (if there is time left to nominate)
> >
> >This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
> >candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those
who
> >still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on
my
> >warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss
off
> >enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
> >has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
> >Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
> >losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
> >group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
> >froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you
two
> >vote and nominate.
> >
> >AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in
is
> >no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of
AUK
> >would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
> >Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two
are
> >showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
> >TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
> >nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future
ballots,
> >nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills'
contributions
> >as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
> >
> >[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
> >galactica.]
> >
> >The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
> >discouraged.
> >
> >http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
> >
> >"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
> >discouraged."
> >
> >Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>
> That's some impressive moral rectitude, Vince.
>
> Where'd you find it?

Art took her to "Build-A-Bear" and she built a col. Jake 'monkey faced'
bear.

TNKev <thekultofkent@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
>> TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>> news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>>
>>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>>
>>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>> been
>>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>> on
>>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>
>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>
>>> SECONDED!
>>>
>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>
>> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>> has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>> losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>> group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>> froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>> vote and nominate.
>>
>> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>
>> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>> galactica.]
>>
>> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>> discouraged.
>>
>> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>
>> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>> discouraged."
>>
>> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>
>Understood.
>
>please accept(or not) my humblest apologies for causing any disruption
>or inconvenience or anything else I may have unintentionally caused.
>
>Kevin (TNKev)

Regardless if this is genuine or not, the lot of you have been warned
on multiple occasions, yet clue penetration did not occur. I'm
guessing (as a completely powerless non-FNVW) that it will take a
considerable new history for the ruling to be reversed if you sincerely
desire it to be so.

[AD-RU snecked]

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:39:37 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks,
>Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <wrangler@caballista.org>
>bloviated:
>
>>TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>>news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>>
>>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>>
>>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>> been
>>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>> on
>>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>
>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>
>>>
>>> SECONDED!
>>>
>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>
>>This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>>candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>>still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>>warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>>enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>>has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>>Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>>losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>>group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>>froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>>vote and nominate.
>>
>>AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>>no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>>would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>>Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>>showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>>TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>>nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>>nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>>as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>
>>[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>>galactica.]
>>
>>The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>>discouraged.
>>
>>http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>
>>"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>>discouraged."
>>
>>Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>
>If I might add, *we* of AUK actually like Kenny Kakes (an AUK moniker)
>and while he is a raging nutbar that froths some of the most illucid
>screed ever seen, he is not a bad guy. That these ****stumps want to
>try to ruin his business because they are in some sort of dick
>flapping contest with him says much about just what kind of pathetic,
>mouth breathing, limp thinking, scum came out of the Starwars Lite
>newsgroup.
>
>It would be a sad day for AUK to devolve into a form that would accept
>those as fellow denizens.

Absolutely, this is 100% spot on.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message

> Absolutely, this is 100% spot on.
>
Who gives a Rat's ***, Pedo Deco?

Number One

"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message

> Regardless if this is genuine or not, the lot of you have been warned
> on multiple occasions, yet clue penetration did not occur. I'm
> guessing (as a completely powerless non-FNVW) that it will take a
> considerable new history for the ruling to be reversed if you
sincerely
> desire it to be so.
>
Thanks for your ruling, Judge "Dick-Licker" Deco! Now FOAD!

Number One

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:56:09 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:39:37 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks,
>Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <wrangler@caballista.org>
>bloviated:
>
>>TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>>news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>>
>>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>>
>>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>> been
>>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>> on
>>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>
>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>
>>>
>>> SECONDED!
>>>
>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>
>>This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>>candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>>still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>>warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>>enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>>has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>>Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>>losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>>group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>>froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>>vote and nominate.
>>
>>AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>>no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>>would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>>Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>>showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>>TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>>nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>>nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>>as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>
>>[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>>galactica.]
>>
>>The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>>discouraged.
>>
>>http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>
>>"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>>discouraged."
>>
>>Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>
>If I might add, *we* of AUK actually like Kenny Kakes (an AUK moniker)
>and while he is a raging nutbar that froths some of the most illucid
>screed ever seen, he is not a bad guy. That these ****stumps want to
>try to ruin his business because they are in some sort of dick
>flapping contest with him says much about just what kind of pathetic,
>mouth breathing, limp thinking, scum came out of the Starwars Lite
>newsgroup.
>
>It would be a sad day for AUK to devolve into a form that would accept
>those as fellow denizens.

Seconded, most heartily.

I can't imagine a UserNetz devoid of KennyKakes, not that he would run
away from two losers. One thing about Kakes, he does not run away.


--

Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top ******* On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Trainer of Steve 'BowTurd' Young
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1

TNKev <thekultofkent@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
>> TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>> news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>>
>>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>>
>>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>> been
>>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>> on
>>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>
>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>
>>> SECONDED!
>>>
>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>
>> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>> has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>> losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>> group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>> froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>> vote and nominate.
>>
>> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>
>> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>> galactica.]
>>
>> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>> discouraged.
>>
>> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>
>> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>> discouraged."
>>
>> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>
>Understood.
>
>please accept(or not) my humblest apologies for causing any disruption
>or inconvenience or anything else I may have unintentionally caused.
>
>Kevin (TNKev)

What's to apologize about?

You've been involved in the entirely-asinine Pangborn-Moore-etc.
flamewar for way too long, with no feedback or interest whatsover in
any other much more relevant and interesting Usenet situations of
Kookologist interest--like say, even on the far end of the a.u.k.
radar screen, the long-standing Carl Rogers "World Highway Library"
garbage on misc.transport.road, which, while fairly mild compared to a
lot of kook behavior, is still idiotic, ridiculous, and worthy of
recognition (which I'm sure CalRog welcomes for the sole purpose of
increasing the Alexa "hit count" on his own roadgeek website, which
for all the bluster he drops on misc.transport.road and other groups,
contains a lot less actual content, pictures and articles, than really
dozens of other MTR reg sites.........)

Etc, etc, etc. IMO, your whole "dads-rights" flamewar is quite
deserving in its own right (independent of "Greegor"'s own GK
nomination this month) of the Golden Killfile, if not a Galactic
Killfile.




Mainly, because it's boring.

[This will be cross and multi-posted to the various groups that were
polluted repeatedly due partly to "FNVW's" foolishness]

All I can say is......well, well, well.........

"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrangler@caballista.org> wrote in
message news:fq72lp$rm5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior.

And not because these "voters" did everything they could manage to violate
civil and criminal laws? Still don't get it, do you, after all this time?
Amazing.

Fine. The federal lawsuit will still include you. Also, some other
"regulars" who decided to sign on with some of "Roger's" and "Wills's"
antics.

I asked you (though it wasn't a request) to do three simple things in my
snail-mail letter to make this right. Until you get served, that
opportunity still exists.

Get a brain.

>That day
> has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both ["TNKev"] and
> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
> losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
> group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
> froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
> vote and nominate.

Does doing the right thing always take you six to twelve months to figure
out?

Maybe the delay exists because it takes that long to apologize to all the
folks you ****ed in the previous cycle.

Hope you get caught up someday.
>
> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."

I only posted this (approximate) assertion forty times.

The only possible reason you didn't concur publicly would be that you're an
***.

> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.

It took me two or three of the "Wills" posts to identify that he was
cat-****. How many thousands did it take you? Then, you tried to cover the
disgrace.

Again....amazing.
>
> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
> galactica.]
>
> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
> discouraged.
>
> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>
> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
> discouraged."
>
> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
> --
> The Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler of AUK
> http://www.club127.net/auk/

Well, I appreciate that you finally decided to stop being an *unqualified*
ignoramous.

You're about halfway there, why bother going to this trouble and still
leaving yourself without credibility?

Not to mention still inviting trouble?

Finally, keep in mind the juvenile and/or toxic rat-****s you've just banned
will not leave for even a day, they'll just morph.

Your post is a fabulously futile act unless you figure out the law and even
your own FAQ.

Clue: There is a fairly distinct difference between stalking, harrasment,
threats, and libel, and the core goals, including entertainment, of AUK.

Atlas Bugged

"TNKev" <thekultofkent@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fq74hp$3tv$1@news.datemas.de...
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
>> TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>> news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>>
>>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>> been harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch
>>>>> here.
>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>> on your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for
>>>>> all
>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>
>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>
>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>
>>> SECONDED!
>>>
>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>
>> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day has
>> come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and Roger.
>> One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of losers,
>> net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a group of
>> people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the froup. I
>> quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two vote and
>> nominate.
>>
>> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark." Since
>> AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are showing
>> every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you, TNKev, and
>> Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your nominations and
>> seconds for this month, along with any future ballots, nominations, and
>> seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions as filler for
>> Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>
>> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>> galactica.]
>>
>> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>> discouraged.
>>
>> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>
>> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>> discouraged."
>>
>> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>
> Understood.
>
> please accept(or not) my humblest apologies for causing any disruption or
> inconvenience or anything else I may have unintentionally caused.
>
> Kevin (TNKev)

There was never anything even slightly less than *pure* intent, you stinking
piece of ****.

Now get out and don't come back.

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:43:22 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
<atlasbuggedBYspam@gmail.com> wrote:

> r
> /^
> / i i
> / V
>[This will be .------./ <VROOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!>
> * *


This house is clean!

Jade

"Atlas Bugged" <atlasbuggedBYspam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dsGdnatvpcI3WFranZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> [This will be cross and multi-posted to the various groups that were
> polluted repeatedly due partly to "FNVW's" foolishness]
>
> All I can say is......well, well, well.........
>
> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler" <wrangler@caballista.org> wrote in
> message news:fq72lp$rm5$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior.
>
> And not because these "voters" did everything they could manage to violate
> civil and criminal laws? Still don't get it, do you, after all this time?
> Amazing.
>
> Fine. The federal lawsuit will still include you. Also, some other
> "regulars" who decided to sign on with some of "Roger's" and "Wills's"
> antics.
>
> I asked you (though it wasn't a request) to do three simple things in my
> snail-mail letter to make this right. Until you get served, that
> opportunity still exists.

> Get a brain.

I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing. The
entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the near
15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!

>>That day has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both
>>["TNKev"] and
>> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>> losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>> group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>> froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>> vote and nominate.

> Does doing the right thing always take you six to twelve months to figure
> out?

Some ****, brainiac has had more than a DECADE to figure out and it
fails to sink in.

> Maybe the delay exists because it takes that long to apologize to all the
> folks you ****ed in the previous cycle.

> Hope you get caught up someday.

Don't hold your breat with the hypocrites alliance EVER doing that!

>> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."

> I only posted this (approximate) assertion forty times.
> The only possible reason you didn't concur publicly would be that you're
> an ***.

The AUK folks find great amusement in harassing others. These are
*******s that would set up chairs outside a downtown office building, grease
the walk outside the building and then laugh as people fall down and they
can sit there and call the people who fall "stupid." Then tell themselves
how SUPERIOR they are. Of course, NOT when the same is done to them!
Hypocricy is the watchword for AUK inmates.

>> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.

> It took me two or three of the "Wills" posts to identify that he was
> cat-****. How many thousands did it take you? Then, you tried to cover
> the disgrace.

> Again....amazing.

>> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>> galactica.]
>>
>> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>> discouraged.
>>
>> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>
>> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>> discouraged."
>>
>> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>> --
>> The Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler of AUK
>> http://www.club127.net/auk/

> Well, I appreciate that you finally decided to stop being an *unqualified*
> ignoramous.

Now he has the "QUALIFICATIONS?"

> You're about halfway there, why bother going to this trouble and still
> leaving yourself without credibility?
>
> Not to mention still inviting trouble?
>
> Finally, keep in mind the juvenile and/or toxic rat-****s you've just
> banned will not leave for even a day, they'll just morph.
>
> Your post is a fabulously futile act unless you figure out the law and
> even your own FAQ.
>
> Clue: There is a fairly distinct difference between stalking, harrasment,
> threats, and libel, and the core goals, including entertainment, of AUK.

Entertainment at the expense of others. The AUK folks are the TYPE to go
to a special Olympics event to LAUGH at the participants. They also go to a
MENSA event to heckle the participants.

"Atlas Bugged" <atlasbuggedBYspam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:C_-dnZe6hr-0WlranZ2dnUVZ_vyinZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "TNKev" <thekultofkent@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>>> been harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch
>>>>>> here.
>>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>>> on your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan
>>>>>> for all
>>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>>
>>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>>
>>>> SECONDED!
>>>>
>>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>>
>>> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>>> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>>> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>>> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>>> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>>> has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>>> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of losers,
>>> net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a group of
>>> people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the froup. I
>>> quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two vote and
>>> nominate.
>>>
>>> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>>> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>>> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>>> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>>> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>>> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>>> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>>> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>>> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>>
>>> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>>> galactica.]
>>>
>>> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>>> discouraged.
>>>
>>> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>>
>>> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>>> discouraged."
>>>
>>> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>>
>> Understood.
>>
>> please accept(or not) my humblest apologies for causing any disruption or
>> inconvenience or anything else I may have unintentionally caused.
>>
>> Kevin (TNKev)
>
> There was never anything even slightly less than *pure* intent, you
> stinking piece of ****.
>
> Now get out and don't come back.

Nothing Kevin has has done in ANY way was anything but totally INTENTIONAL!
His apologies are 100% insincere!

> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing. The
> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the near
> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!

i will not let this slander go unchallenged

expect to hear from my lawyers

arf meow arf - everything thing i know i learned
from the collective unconscience of odd bodkins
nobody could do that much decoupage
without calling on the powers of darkness

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:19:14 -0800, mariposas rand mair fheal
<mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing. The
>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the near
>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>
>i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>
>expect to hear from my lawyers

Neither will I!

Expect to hear from my obstreperous gremlins.

Jade

"mariposas rand mair fheal" <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mair_fheal-46AFB0.07191429022008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing.
>> The
>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the
>> near
>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>
> i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>
> expect to hear from my lawyers


Didn't you hear? The firm of Dewey Gypum & Howe went under.

" krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"mariposas rand mair fheal" <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:mair_fheal-46AFB0.07191429022008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing.
>>> The
>>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the
>>> near
>>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>>
>> i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>>
>> expect to hear from my lawyers
>
>
>Didn't you hear? The firm of Dewey Gypum & Howe went under.

Dewey, Cheatum and Howe. Anti-gypsy slur noted.





("Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese!")

"Art Deco" <erfc@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:280220081828296543%erfc@caballista.org...
> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:39:37 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <wrangler@caballista.org>
>>bloviated:
>>
>>>TNKev <TheKultofKent@yahoo.com/> wrote in
>>>news:fo7kdu$h1u$2@news.datemas.de:
>>>
>>>> The One True Roger wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:04:57 GMT, I found that " krp"
>>>>> <krp2457k@verizon.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Mm4pj.6911$Rg1.5456@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>>> been
>>>>>> harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch here.
>>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan for all
>>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SECONDED!
>>>>
>>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>>
>>>This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>>>candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>>>still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>>>warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>>>enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>>>has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>>>Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of
>>>losers, net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a
>>>group of people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the
>>>froup. I quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two
>>>vote and nominate.
>>>
>>>AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>>>no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>>>would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>>>Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>>>showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>>>TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>>>nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>>>nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>>>as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>>
>>>[alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>>>galactica.]
>>>
>>>The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>>>discouraged.
>>>
>>>http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>>
>>>"Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>>>discouraged."
>>>
>>>Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>>
>>If I might add, *we* of AUK actually like Kenny Kakes (an AUK moniker)
>>and while he is a raging nutbar that froths some of the most illucid
>>screed ever seen, he is not a bad guy. That these ****stumps want to
>>try to ruin his business because they are in some sort of dick
>>flapping contest with him says much about just what kind of pathetic,
>>mouth breathing, limp thinking, scum came out of the Starwars Lite
>>newsgroup.
>>
>>It would be a sad day for AUK to devolve into a form that would accept
>>those as fellow denizens.
>
> Absolutely, this is 100% spot on.


TOO LATE!

"Archie Leach" <leach@thepen.ismightier> wrote in message
news:faags3dv0n2s74oo48d4aqsmonm4buc1kd@4ax.com...

>>>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit
>>>> amusing.
>>>> The
>>>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the
>>>> near
>>>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>>>
>>> i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>>>
>>> expect to hear from my lawyers
>>
>>
>>Didn't you hear? The firm of Dewey Gypum & Howe went under.
>
> Dewey, Cheatum and Howe. Anti-gypsy slur noted.


That one folded too. Excessive courtroom flatulence.

In article <pm9gs35u4anp4allg3rfe0u1gb991gnrlg@4ax.com>,
Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:19:14 -0800, mariposas rand mair fheal
> <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing.
> >> The
> >> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the
> >> near
> >> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
> >
> >i will not let this slander go unchallenged
> >
> >expect to hear from my lawyers
>
> Neither will I!
>
> Expect to hear from my obstreperous gremlins.

rambler on

arf meow arf - everything thing i know i learned
from the collective unconscience of odd bodkins
nobody could do that much decoupage
without calling on the powers of darkness

Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:19:14 -0800, mariposas rand mair fheal
><mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing. The
>>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the near
>>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>>
>>i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>>
>>expect to hear from my lawyers
>
>Neither will I!
>
>Expect to hear from my obstreperous gremlins.

And my cantankerous kobolds as well.

krp wrote:
> "Atlas Bugged" <atlasbuggedBYspam@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:C_-dnZe6hr-0WlranZ2dnUVZ_vyinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> "TNKev" <thekultofkent@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> Ken claims that 'all you *******s' have 'harassed' this Joy Joyous.
>>>>>>>> And yet, he offers no proof....and Greg, unbelievably, backs him
>>>>>>>> up on it. I guess we know now who is a liar and who is not, because
>>>>>>>> you know as well as I do that if there was any truth what so ever
>>>>>>>> to the accusations Ken would be posting that **** here so fast the
>>>>>>>> cursor on his keyboard couldn't keep up.
>>>>>>> The small problem here Betty is that you KNOW your pal Kane HAS
>>>>>>> been harassing the woman. So again you are just a lying bitch
>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>> Now, all you creeps have to do is find out HOW I know you know. Your
>>>>>>> boat has a leak in it somewhere Betty. Now all you guys need to do
>>>>>>> is find out where.
>>>>>>> Is somebody's line tapped? Is there a PI working on you fools? Do
>>>>>>> you have a traitor in your midst? Which one of you is it? Look at
>>>>>>> each other and wonder. Who is it? Who is tipping Pangborn. Or -
>>>>>>> WHOSE line is tapped? Is it MINE? Have I been hearing funny noises
>>>>>>> on my line? Have downloads been a little slow lately? Do I have a
>>>>>>> virus on my computer? Did Gregg Hanson PLANT something on my machine
>>>>>>> on ALL of our machines?
>>>>>>> Tell me Betty - when was the last time you ran a REALLY deep scan
>>>>>>> on your system? Sullivan? Kane? I mean a down to the core scan
>>>>>>> for all
>>>>>>> possible infections? You know, Gregg is VERY expert in that.
>>>>>>> Firemonkey told ya about what happened to HER system from Gregg.
>>>>>>> Yeah, that's the ticket, blame Greg.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <giggle>
>>>>>> This, combined with you having a friend post your name in a court
>>>>>> case you had nothing to do with,, your complete ignorance, your
>>>>>> nonsensical whines of persecution, and your prediction of everyone
>>>>>> going to be punished is why I am nominating you for the Looney
>>>>>> Maroon, something LONG overdue with you.
>>>>>>
>>>>> SECONDED!
>>>>>
>>>>> (if there is time left to nominate)
>>>> This nomination is rejected, not because Ken Pangborn isn't a worthy
>>>> candidate (he is, and I'll accept nominations and seconds from those who
>>>> still have the franchise), but because I've decided to follow up on my
>>>> warning that I would disenfranchise voters who have managed to piss off
>>>> enough other kookologists with their unacceptable behavior. That day
>>>> has come, as I have received multiple complaints about both you and
>>>> Roger. One kookologist called you two part of "a whining gang of losers,
>>>> net.policemen and outer filth who have set up camp in AUK," a group of
>>>> people the core kookologists would like to see gone from the froup. I
>>>> quite agree with them (tiat) and I am sorry I ever let you two vote and
>>>> nominate.
>>>>
>>>> AUK is about snark and entertainment, and what you two are engaged in is
>>>> no longer entertaining. It also discredits what the kookologists of AUK
>>>> would like to see their group as, a home for "full-contact snark."
>>>> Since AUK does not need another Michael Baldwin Bruce, and you two are
>>>> showing every sign of following in his footsteps, I rule that you,
>>>> TNKev, and Roger are disenfranchised until further notice. All your
>>>> nominations and seconds for this month, along with any future ballots,
>>>> nominations, and seconds you attempt will join Kent Wills' contributions
>>>> as filler for Fluffy's Litter Box.
>>>>
>>>> [alt.support.child-protective-services replaced with alt.battlestar-
>>>> galactica.]
>>>>
>>>> The FAQ reminds readers of AUK that trolling support groups is
>>>> discouraged.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.club127.net/auk/faq.html#question4
>>>>
>>>> "Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
>>>> discouraged."
>>>>
>>>> Oh, yes, that alone is yet another reason to disenfranchise you two.
>>> Understood.
>>>
>>> please accept(or not) my humblest apologies for causing any disruption or
>>> inconvenience or anything else I may have unintentionally caused.
>>>
>>> Kevin (TNKev)
>> There was never anything even slightly less than *pure* intent, you
>> stinking piece of ****.
>>
>> Now get out and don't come back.
>
> Nothing Kevin has has done in ANY way was anything but totally INTENTIONAL!

That's 100% accurate Kenny-Bob,poking you with a stick to make spew
screed was my intention.
Upsetting,disrupting AUK was not my intention,"trolling" support groups
definitely was *not* my intention.


> His apologies are 100% insincere!
>
>

There is one thing I am not Kenny-Bob and that is a liar,I take great
pride in myself that I do not lie to anyone for any reason.the truth
sets you free!

My apology to Pinku and to AUK was most assuredly sincere.

I expect some of them to be nipping at my heels on the way out,and
that's perfectly fine,every one is deserved their opinion,I know what
kind of person I am and I know my apology to them was sincere.If it's
your opinion and their opinion I am a piece of **** liar, well...so be
it, I know I am not and that's all that counts to *me* :-D

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:49:19 -0600, Archie Leach
<leach@thepen.ismightier> wrote:

>" krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"mariposas rand mair fheal" <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:mair_fheal-46AFB0.07191429022008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing.
>>>> The
>>>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the
>>>> near
>>>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>>>
>>> i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>>>
>>> expect to hear from my lawyers
>>
>>
>>Didn't you hear? The firm of Dewey Gypum & Howe went under.
>
>Dewey, Cheatum and Howe. Anti-gypsy slur noted.

It is amazing how many people still don't realize that is an ethnic
slur. However, I'm not giving Kenny Kakes a presumptive free pass.

>
>
>
>
>
>("Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese!")
>
>

Anti-Curley slur noted!

Jade

Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> posted
<kt1gs3doo40mv343j78cof2v74jmjirqbv@4ax.com> in
alt.battlestar-galactica on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:34:14 -0500:

>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:43:22 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
><atlasbuggedBYspam@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> r
>> /^
>> / i i
>> / V
>>[This will be .------./ <VROOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!>
>> * *
>
>
>This house is clean!

You should ask Novins about barratry.



--
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)

Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.
It's already tomorrow in Australia.
-Charles Schultz

COOSN-266-06-02374
Hammer of Thor, April 2005
PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER June 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle X 2
#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top *******s on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:49:19 -0600, Archie Leach
<leach@thepen.ismightier> employed an infinite number of monkeys on an
infinite number of typewriter to say:

>" krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"mariposas rand mair fheal" <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:mair_fheal-46AFB0.07191429022008@sn-ip.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing.
>>>> The
>>>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the
>>>> near
>>>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>>>
>>> i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>>>
>>> expect to hear from my lawyers
>>
>>
>>Didn't you hear? The firm of Dewey Gypum & Howe went under.
>
>Dewey, Cheatum and Howe. Anti-gypsy slur noted.
>
You could also engage Benn, Dover & Spredem

>
>
>
>("Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese!")
>
>
--
Boston Blackie©
mhm 29x8

"Enemy to those who make him an enemy. Friend to those who have no
friend."
--from the intro to the Boston Blackie radio show (1945)

"You don't have to be a member of the KKK to be a wizard under the sheets"

Proud member of the I am Spooge lits

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:25:53 -0500, K. A. Cannon
<kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:

>Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> posted
><kt1gs3doo40mv343j78cof2v74jmjirqbv@4ax.com> in
>alt.battlestar-galactica on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:34:14 -0500:
>
>>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:43:22 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
>><atlasbuggedBYspam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> r
>>> /^
>>> / i i
>>> / V
>>>[This will be .------./ <VROOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!>
>>> * *
>>
>>
>>This house is clean!
>
>You should ask Novins about barratry.

Certain losers here are too pathetic to engage in discussion with.

More importantly, what did you think of the world's most poorly drawn
ascii vacuum?

Jade

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:19:14 -0800, in alt.usenet.kooks, mariposas
rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> bloviated:

>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing. The
>> entire concept of AUK - not to mention its history of behavior over the near
>> 15 years it has existed, is one of amazing hypocricy!
>
>i will not let this slander go unchallenged
>
>expect to hear from my lawyers
>

"24, 24, 24 days to go
I wanna be k00ksooted"

Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> posted
<3iegs35sv4fjb24qot9n3eq7h8u8omhe12@4ax.com> in alt.usenet.kooks on
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:02:58 -0500:

>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:25:53 -0500, K. A. Cannon
><kcannon@insurgent.orgy> wrote:
>
>>Daedalus <jade@newtko0ouks.biz> posted
>><kt1gs3doo40mv343j78cof2v74jmjirqbv@4ax.com> in
>>alt.battlestar-galactica on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:34:14 -0500:
>>
>>>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:43:22 -0500, "Atlas Bugged"
>>><atlasbuggedBYspam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> r
>>>> /^
>>>> / i i
>>>> / V
>>>>[This will be .------./ <VROOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!>
>>>> * *
>>>
>>>
>>>This house is clean!
>>
>>You should ask Novins about barratry.
>
>Certain losers here are too pathetic to engage in discussion with.
>
>More importantly, what did you think of the world's most poorly drawn
>ascii vacuum?

Not bad.

Dig the sig.

--
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)


"I/\IIIiIII++
///\IIIiIIi+
.o8OOOOOOOOOOOOOo/IIIIIiIIi
oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIIIIIiI
888888888888OOOOOOOOOOOOIIIII
o8OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO88888OOOOOOOOIIIT
oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO888OOOOOb
8OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO8OOOOOb
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO88OOOOb
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO8OOOO.
OOOO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OOOOOOOOOOOO8OOOb
OO~ oo8888888888888oo ~~OOOOOOOOO8OOO
8 oO888888888888888888oo ~~OOOOOOO8OO
8 OO888888888888888888888oo OOOOOO8OO
~8 O8888888888888888888888888 ~OOOOOP
~O88 ~888~Y88Y88P 888888>-~OOOO
88b ~~ .888 ~~ d88888| ( OOOO
88Xooo88888ooood8888888/ /XooO~
~88888888888888888888| |OOX|
//88888888888888888:',:OOO| \
,'/OOOO888888888888~<-<OOOOO| "Where's the kaboom?
<-<OOOOO| jFFFFFFFFF* \ \OOOO| There was supposed to be
\ \OOO/ H********** | |OOO/ an Earth shattering
\_\O/ H*******\*** \ \O/ kaboom!"
H\*******|** \_V
H*\******|**
__ H\*\*****|**
_( `-vH*\******|** __
_l `- \\**\*****|** _/' \
( ~-_ \\*******|**-T \ |
\ \_ _ \)******(__/ | |>
| Y .. ,O\****** _ / | |<_
___~-'8o8OO88OX8OOOO ~ Y '/O8|
,' `-_OOOOOOOXX|OOOO8o. .A /OX/>
/... \X8OOOXX/|OOOOO|OOOOO8X\X/ <_
888888b \XXX8X/:|OOOOO|\8XXXXX \
d88888888 |\X8/::|8XXXX|\IXX~ \ d8. \
888888888b \ \/ ::lXXXXXl ~~ \--_|888 \
Y88DR88888 | .::"-----" /_-_|~8~ |
888888888b \ ::: /_ -_| |
8888GUZ888 | :: /_ -_ | |
888888888b \::: /_ -_ / [
888888888 |`: / -_ / ]
88888888b | | / |
88888888b [ | ( /
88888888 ] | /
~888888b | \ ,'
~88888 | `.___,--'
~~88_/

Women wearing Wonderbras and low-cut blouses lose their
right to complain about having their boobs stared at.

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:42:45 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Daedalus
<jade@newtko0ouks.biz> bloviated:

>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:19:14 -0800, mariposas rand mair fheal
><mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> I find his criticism of Wills, Kevin, and Roger to be a bit amusing. The
>>