On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>they are wrong.
>
>Just sayin'

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.

Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.

--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>
>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>they are wrong.
>>
>>Just sayin'
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>
>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.

You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?

or

"4-0-Whine" ?

oh...

yeah.

you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"

--

Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top ******* On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Trainer of Steve 'BowTurd' Young
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, in the land of alt.aratzio, Fred
Hall <fkhall@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>
>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>they are wrong.
>>>
>>>Just sayin'
>>
>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>
>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>
>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>
>or
>
>"4-0-Whine" ?
>
>oh...
>
>yeah.
>
>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"

Much better than mine, you suck.

--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:

>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.

>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>they are wrong.

>>Just sayin'

>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.

Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>

"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
that.)"

Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
that signify?

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>
>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>they are wrong.
>>>
>>>Just sayin'
>>
>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>
>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>
>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>
>or
>
>"4-0-Whine" ?
>
>oh...
>
>yeah.
>
>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"

Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:25:19 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>
>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>Just sayin'
>
>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>
>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>
>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>that.)"

You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
baked ego told you it would.

>
>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>that signify?

Cramps rule #1:
Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.

Cramps Rule #2:
When all else fails, WHINE for help.


--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:26:52 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>
>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>Just sayin'
>>>
>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>
>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>
>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>
>>or
>>
>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>
>>oh...
>>
>>yeah.
>>
>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>
>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.

Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
working.



--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:
>
>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>>>Just sayin'
>
>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>
>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>
>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>that.)"
>
>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>baked ego told you it would.
>
>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>that signify?
>
>>Cramps rule #1:
>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>
>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>
>It probably was tactical error

Well, kooks do have a way of understating their idiocy.

--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:46:10 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:36:12 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:26:52 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
>><mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>
>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>
>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>>
>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>>
>>>>or
>>>>
>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>>
>>>>oh...
>>>>
>>>>yeah.
>>>>
>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>>
>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>
>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>working.
>
>Tarnslation: victolly is mine!
>
>LOL

The idjit begging for help can't spot the irony in that one.

--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:

>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.

>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>they are wrong.

>>>>Just sayin'

>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.

>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>

>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>that.)"

>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>baked ego told you it would.

>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>that signify?

>Cramps rule #1:
>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.

>Cramps Rule #2:
>When all else fails, WHINE for help.

It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.

See ya there!

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:36:12 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:26:52 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
><mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>
>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>
>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>
>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>
>>>or
>>>
>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>
>>>oh...
>>>
>>>yeah.
>>>
>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>
>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>
>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>working.

Tarnslation: victolly is mine!

LOL

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:43:41 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
><mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>
>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>
>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>
>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>
>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>
>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>
>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>that.)"
>>
>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>
>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>that signify?
>>
>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>
>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>
>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>
>>See ya there!
>
>Well, kooks do have a way of understating their idiocy.

Don't they though!

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:54:21 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:43:41 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
>><mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>
>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>
>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>
>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>
>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>
>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>
>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>that.)"
>>>
>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>
>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>that signify?
>>>
>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>
>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>
>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>
>>>See ya there!
>>
>>Well, kooks do have a way of understating their idiocy.
>
>Don't they though!

Wow, you are on a roll. Such a come back.

--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:

>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.

>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>they are wrong.

>>>>>>>Just sayin'

>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.

>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.

>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?

>>>>>or

>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?

>>>>>oh...

>>>>>yeah.

>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"

>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.

>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>working.

>>Tarnslation: victolly is mine!

>>LOL

>The idjit begging for help can't spot the irony in that one.

Taking a poke at Charlotte != begging for help. But nice try.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:57:09 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:
>>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>
>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>
>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>
>>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>
>>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>
>>>>>>or
>
>>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>
>>>>>>oh...
>
>>>>>>yeah.
>
>>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>
>>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>
>>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>>working.
>
>>>Tarnslation: victolly is mine!
>
>>>LOL
>
>>The idjit begging for help can't spot the irony in that one.
>
>Taking a poke at Charlotte != begging for help. But nice try.

So, your posting a cry for help because your lame troll sucks is now
"taking a poke at charlotte"

Next up, Cramps will explain how his constant use of IKYABWAI is not
lame like it is for every other kook.


--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:
>
>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>>>Just sayin'
>
>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>
>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>
>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>that.)"
>
>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>baked ego told you it would.
>
>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>that signify?
>
>>Cramps rule #1:
>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>
>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>
>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>
>See ya there!

lol

You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:24:45 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, in the land of alt.aratzio, Fred
>Hall <fkhall@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>
>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>Just sayin'
>>>
>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>
>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>
>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>
>>or
>>
>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>
>>oh...
>>
>>yeah.
>>
>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>
>Much better than mine, you suck.

Why do people keep saying and posting that?

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:26:52 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>
>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>Just sayin'
>>>
>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>
>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>
>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>
>>or
>>
>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>
>>oh...
>>
>>yeah.
>>
>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>
>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.

Are you depressed, Cranston?

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>
>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>
>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>
>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>
>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>
>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>
>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>
>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>
>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>
>>>>See ya there!
>>>
>>>Well, kooks do have a way of understating their idiocy.
>>
>>Don't they though!
>
>Wow, you are on a roll. Such a come back.

Yawn. How about we just go back to the other thread and you keep
evading the question there?

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:36:12 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:26:52 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
><mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>
>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>
>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>
>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>
>>>or
>>>
>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>
>>>oh...
>>>
>>>yeah.
>>>
>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>
>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>
>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>working.

He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel:

snip

>>Taking a poke at Charlotte != begging for help. But nice try.

>So, your posting a cry for help because your lame troll sucks is now
>"taking a poke at charlotte"

I don't know how lame my troll really is. Are you sure you aren't
feeling a little bit defensive about your idiocy in evading an
indistinguishable question from the one you asked Rhonda, then
proceeding to berate and insult her when she didn't give you a yes or
no answer?

But in point of fact, it wasn't a cry for help from Charlotte. I've
seen enough to know that if she takes sides in this, it won't be mine.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:23:27 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>
>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>
>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>
>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>
>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>
>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>
>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>that.)"
>>
>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>
>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>that signify?
>>
>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>
>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>
>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>
>>See ya there!
>
>lol
>
>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.

For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.

Fred Hall wrote:
>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:

>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.

>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>they are wrong.

>>>>>>Just sayin'

>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.

>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.

>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?

>>>>or

>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?

>>>>oh...

>>>>yeah.

>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"

>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.

>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>working.

>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.

Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!

In <fqqfqj$cf6$5@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, Fred Hall
fkhall@gmail.com said:
: On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:
:
: >Aratzio wrote:
: >>miguel:
: >>>Aratzio wrote:
: >>>>>miguel:
: >
: >>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
: >>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
: >>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
: >
: >>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
: >>>>>they are wrong.
: >
: >>>>>Just sayin'
: >
: >>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
: >>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
: >
: >>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
: >
: >>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
: >>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
: >>>that.)"
: >
: >>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
: >>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
: >>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
: >>baked ego told you it would.
: >
: >>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
: >>>that signify?
: >
: >>Cramps rule #1:
: >>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
: >>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
: >
: >>Cramps Rule #2:
: >>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
: >
: >It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
: >practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
: >this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
: >
: >See ya there!
:
: lol
:
: You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.

If he knew when to stop, he wouldn't be a kook.

--
Kali

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:37:02 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>Fred Hall wrote:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>
>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>
>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>
>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>
>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>
>>>>>or
>
>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>
>>>>>oh...
>
>>>>>yeah.
>
>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>
>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>
>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>working.
>
>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>
>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!

Gee, Cranston, if you've got an exit strategy, what is it?

Or will you just continue to whine in this thread and hope I get
bored?

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:32:57 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:23:27 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>
>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>
>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>
>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>
>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>
>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>
>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>that.)"
>>>
>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>
>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>that signify?
>>>
>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>
>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>
>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>
>>>See ya there!
>>
>>lol
>>
>>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>
>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.

Like I give a **** what you wish.

Please, continue to beg 'Ratz to abandon this thread, coward

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 23:44:28 -0500, Kali <kali@powder.keg> wrote:

>In <fqqfqj$cf6$5@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, Fred Hall
>fkhall@gmail.com said:
>: On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:44:56 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:
>:
>: >Aratzio wrote:
>: >>miguel:
>: >>>Aratzio wrote:
>: >>>>>miguel:
>: >
>: >>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>: >>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>: >>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>: >
>: >>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>: >>>>>they are wrong.
>: >
>: >>>>>Just sayin'
>: >
>: >>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>: >>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>: >
>: >>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>: >
>: >>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>: >>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>: >>>that.)"
>: >
>: >>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>: >>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>: >>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>: >>baked ego told you it would.
>: >
>: >>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>: >>>that signify?
>: >
>: >>Cramps rule #1:
>: >>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>: >>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>: >
>: >>Cramps Rule #2:
>: >>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>: >
>: >It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>: >practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>: >this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>: >
>: >See ya there!
>:
>: lol
>:
>: You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>
>If he knew when to stop, he wouldn't be a kook.

I agree, mistress. Please don't tell Cranston I'm your sock, I'm
starting to have fun.

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

Fred Hall wrote:
>miguel wrote:
>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:
>>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>
>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>
>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>
>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>
>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>
>>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>
>>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>
>>>>>>or
>>
>>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>
>>>>>>oh...
>>
>>>>>>yeah.
>>
>>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>
>>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>
>>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>>working.
>>
>>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>>
>>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!
>
>Gee, Cranston, if you've got an exit strategy, what is it?
>
>Or will you just continue to whine in this thread and hope I get
>bored?

As if.

Fred Hall wrote:
>miguel wrote:
>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>
>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>
>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>
>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>
>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>
>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>
>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>
>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>
>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>
>>>>See ya there!
>>>
>>>lol
>>>
>>>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>>
>>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.
>
>Like I give a **** what you wish.
>
>Please, continue to beg 'Ratz to abandon this thread, coward

I don't know if "coward" is quite fair, but I concede that it doesn't
take much courage to take on you, Kali, and Aratzio. It's somewhere
between fish in a barrel and taking a dump.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:57:40 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>Fred Hall wrote:
>>miguel wrote:
>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>
>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>
>>>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>
>>>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>
>>>>>>>or
>>>
>>>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>
>>>>>>>oh...
>>>
>>>>>>>yeah.
>>>
>>>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>>
>>>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>>
>>>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>>>working.
>>>
>>>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>>>
>>>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!
>>
>>Gee, Cranston, if you've got an exit strategy, what is it?
>>
>>Or will you just continue to whine in this thread and hope I get
>>bored?
>
>As if.

I'll take that as an admission that you will continue to whine

--

Just in case you don't know this, you are more annoying than the
cockroaches that creep into houses after a good rain. And less
valuable too.-- Polonius Commenting On the Usefulness of Dita**** The inept Okie

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:05:11 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:57:40 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>or
>>>>
>>>>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>>
>>>>>>>>oh...
>>>>
>>>>>>>>yeah.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>>>
>>>>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>>>
>>>>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>>>>working.
>>>>
>>>>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>>>>
>>>>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!
>>>
>>>Gee, Cranston, if you've got an exit strategy, what is it?
>>>
>>>Or will you just continue to whine in this thread and hope I get
>>>bored?
>>
>>As if.
>
>I'll take that as an admission that you will continue to whine

If that makes you feel better.

IOW: Whoosh!

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:59:26 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>Fred Hall wrote:
>>miguel wrote:
>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>
>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>
>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>
>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>
>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>
>>>>lol
>>>>
>>>>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>>>
>>>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>>>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.
>>
>>Like I give a **** what you wish.
>>
>>Please, continue to beg 'Ratz to abandon this thread, coward
>
>I don't know if "coward" is quite fair,

Oh, it is. Fair and balanced, even

> but I concede that it doesn't
>take much courage to take on you, Kali, and Aratzio.

Take us (tinu) on? What sort of prize do you hope to gain if you win
this imaginary contest?

> It's somewhere
>between fish in a barrel and taking a dump.

Right. That's why you can't stop responding. Care to explain your
obsession, or is self-analysis not one of your skills?

--

"you're a sadsack with no life" Polonius the Wise laughing at Dita**** the Unwise Okie

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:07:26 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:05:11 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:57:40 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>or
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>oh...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>yeah.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>>>>>working.
>>>>>
>>>>>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>>>>>
>>>>>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!
>>>>
>>>>Gee, Cranston, if you've got an exit strategy, what is it?
>>>>
>>>>Or will you just continue to whine in this thread and hope I get
>>>>bored?
>>>
>>>As if.
>>
>>I'll take that as an admission that you will continue to whine
>
>If that makes you feel better.

Your constant whining does very little for me

>
>IOW: Whoosh!

Not likely Cranston, but it is obvious that you prefer fantasy to
reality

--

"No need to put up with a newsgroup full of incorrect information by
self-appointed know it alls, with unbearable arrogance. No need to fight
through virus and worm laden posts. No need to fight through personal
vendettas, and obscenity laden posts."

Dr Frank aka RobertM and a thousand other socks says goodbye to alt.cellular.sprintpcs
in August 2004

Fred Hall wrote:
>miguel wrote:
>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>>
>>>>>lol
>>>>>
>>>>>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>>>>
>>>>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>>>>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.
>>>
>>>Like I give a **** what you wish.
>>>
>>>Please, continue to beg 'Ratz to abandon this thread, coward
>>
>>I don't know if "coward" is quite fair,

>Oh, it is. Fair and balanced, even

Raally? Tell us why you think so.

>> but I concede that it doesn't
>>take much courage to take on you, Kali, and Aratzio.

>Take us (tinu) on? What sort of prize do you hope to gain if you win
>this imaginary contest?

I'm betting on crowns of glory in heaven. It's unlikely there'll be
much earthly reward.

>> It's somewhere
>>between fish in a barrel and taking a dump.

>Right. That's why you can't stop responding. Care to explain your
>obsession, or is self-analysis not one of your skills?

Hmmm. I'm having a back and forth with Aratzio, and you and Kali jump
in and can't stop posting. Maybe you should step back and rethink your
question, viz, to whom it might be better propounded.

miguel, sorry for the beeg words Fred

Fred Hall wrote:
>miguel wrote:
>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>miguel:

>>>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.

>>>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>>>>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>>>>>>>>oh...
>>>>>>>>>>yeah.
>>>>>>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>>>>>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>>>>>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>>>>>>working.
>>>>>>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>>>>>>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!
>>>>>Gee, Cranston, if you've got an exit strategy, what is it?
>>>>>Or will you just continue to whine in this thread and hope I get
>>>>>bored?
>>>>As if.
>>>I'll take that as an admission that you will continue to whine
>>If that makes you feel better.
>Your constant whining does very little for me

It seems to be keeping you up late at night.

>>IOW: Whoosh!

>Not likely Cranston, but it is obvious that you prefer fantasy to
>reality

Not likely? Tell me what "as if" implied. Show your work.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:25:56 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>
>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>
>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>
>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>
>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>
>>>>Well, kooks do have a way of understating their idiocy.
>>>
>>>Don't they though!
>>
>>Wow, you are on a roll. Such a come back.
>
>Yawn. How about we just go back to the other thread and you keep
>evading the question there?

Wow, a yawn too. Damn, yer just like the best at puttin worms on
hooks.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:26:55 -0600, in alt.aratzio, Fred Hall
<fkhall@gmail.com> bloviated:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:36:12 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:26:52 -0800, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel
>><mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0600, Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:59:40 -0800, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:48:45 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>
>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>
>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>>
>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>>
>>>>or
>>>>
>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>>
>>>>oh...
>>>>
>>>>yeah.
>>>>
>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>>
>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>
>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>working.
>
>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.

He should have stuck to his Reagan model, never pick a fight with
someone that fights back, if you do find one that fights back, run
away.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:29:43 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>
>snip
>
>>>Taking a poke at Charlotte != begging for help. But nice try.
>
>>So, your posting a cry for help because your lame troll sucks is now
>>"taking a poke at charlotte"
>
>I don't know

Too stupid to read what was just written?

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:32:57 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:


>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.

"Yer stupid!"

See cramps, that is why you are considered such a lame wanker. Your
whole schtick consists of standard responses unless you have been
especially spanked, then it consists of a long obsessive IKYABWAI.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:37:02 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Fred Hall wrote:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>
>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>
>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>
>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>
>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>
>>>>>or
>
>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>
>>>>>oh...
>
>>>>>yeah.
>
>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>
>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>
>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>working.
>
>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>
>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!

Behold! The cramps standardized response!

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:57:40 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Fred Hall wrote:
>>miguel wrote:
>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>Fred Hall >wrote:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>
>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>
>>>>>>>>Next up, big hits from the Beach Boys.
>>>
>>>>>>>You mean "Whine Whine Whine (till the admin takes his Usenet away)" ?
>>>
>>>>>>>or
>>>
>>>>>>>"4-0-Whine" ?
>>>
>>>>>>>oh...
>>>
>>>>>>>yeah.
>>>
>>>>>>>you meant "Help Me [first one to insert name wins]"
>>>
>>>>>>Looks like the "A" Team has arrived.
>>>
>>>>>Better find a way out soon. None of your present exit strategies is
>>>>>working.
>>>
>>>>He studied tactics under Bush and Johnson.
>>>
>>>Behold! The Circle-jerk Dance o' Victory!
>>
>>Gee, Cranston, if you've got an exit strategy, what is it?
>>
>>Or will you just continue to whine in this thread and hope I get
>>bored?
>
>As if.

Really, that ego, lies to you, constantly. You are pretty boring when
you start one of your obsesso fanboi IKYABWAI threads.

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:59:26 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Fred Hall wrote:
>>miguel wrote:
>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>
>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>
>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>
>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>
>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>
>>>>lol
>>>>
>>>>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>>>
>>>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>>>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.
>>
>>Like I give a **** what you wish.
>>
>>Please, continue to beg 'Ratz to abandon this thread, coward
>
>I don't know if "coward" is quite fair, but I concede that it doesn't
>take much courage to take on you, Kali, and Aratzio. It's somewhere
>between fish in a barrel and taking a dump.

No matter how obsessive Cramps gets, he, like every other
self-involved k00k never can quite spot the part where they go from
"trying to troll" to "running in circles".

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:08:24 -0600, in alt.aratzio, Fred Hall
<fkhall@gmail.com> bloviated:

>On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:59:26 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>>
>>>>>lol
>>>>>
>>>>>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>>>>
>>>>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>>>>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.
>>>
>>>Like I give a **** what you wish.
>>>
>>>Please, continue to beg 'Ratz to abandon this thread, coward
>>
>>I don't know if "coward" is quite fair,
>
>Oh, it is. Fair and balanced, even
>
>> but I concede that it doesn't
>>take much courage to take on you, Kali, and Aratzio.
>
>Take us (tinu) on? What sort of prize do you hope to gain if you win
>this imaginary contest?
>
>> It's somewhere
>>between fish in a barrel and taking a dump.
>
>Right. That's why you can't stop responding. Care to explain your
>obsession, or is self-analysis not one of your skills?

He gets obsessive after taking a virtual bitch slapping.

Frogging meat with subject lines in my honor. He'll never be able to
see himself for what he is.

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:
>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>miguel:

>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.

>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.

>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'

>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>>Well, kooks do have a way of understating their idiocy.
>>>>Don't they though!
>>>Wow, you are on a roll. Such a come back.
>>Yawn. How about we just go back to the other thread and you keep
>>evading the question there?
>Wow, a yawn too. Damn, yer just like the best at puttin worms on
>hooks.

Erm, how many times did you respond to me over the span of about 20
minutes? And yet, even after all that, you still can't give a straight
yes or no answer to the question.

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel bloviated:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>miguel:

>>snip

>>>>Taking a poke at Charlotte != begging for help. But nice try.

>>>So, your posting a cry for help because your lame troll sucks is now
>>>"taking a poke at charlotte"

>>I don't know how lame my troll really is. Are you sure you aren't
>>feeling a little bit defensive about your idiocy in evading an
>>indistinguishable question from the one you asked Rhonda, then
>>proceeding to berate and insult her when she didn't give you a yes or
>>no answer?

>>But in point of fact, it wasn't a cry for help from Charlotte. I've
>>seen enough to know that if she takes sides in this, it won't be mine.

>Too stupid to read what was just written?

When I restore your snippage, it makes your responses look a little
stupid, don't you think?

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel bloviated:

>>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.

>"Yer stupid!"

>See cramps, that is why you are considered such a lame wanker. Your
>whole schtick consists of standard responses unless you have been
>especially spanked, then it consists of a long obsessive IKYABWAI.
>
"Cramps."

And I'm the lame wanker ...

Right now my "schtick" consists of asking you to answer a question
with a yes or a no. The question is identical to a question you
demanded that Rhonda answer yes or no, and when she didn't, you
derided her character and intelligence. Now that you find yourself in
the same position she was, you are reduced to calling me names like
"cramps" and "lame wanker."

There's a word for behavior like that.

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel bloviated:
>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>Fred Hall wrote:
>>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>>
>>>>>lol
>>>>>
>>>>>You are such a ****ing coward, Cranston.
>>>>
>>>>For the most part, you're pretty benign, but you aren't the brightest
>>>>bulb on the tree. I wish you no ill.
>>>
>>>Like I give a **** what you wish.
>>>
>>>Please, continue to beg 'Ratz to abandon this thread, coward
>>
>>I don't know if "coward" is quite fair, but I concede that it doesn't
>>take much courage to take on you, Kali, and Aratzio. It's somewhere
>>between fish in a barrel and taking a dump.
>
>No matter how obsessive Cramps gets, he, like every other
>self-involved k00k never can quite spot the part where they go from
>"trying to troll" to "running in circles".

There's the USDA daily requirement for irony.

On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:56:12 -0800, miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>
>>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display when ever you wish, I, for one,
>>>>>>>>think you should continue. It is all up to you. You do remember
>>>>>>>>begging for my attention? Too bad it didn't work out like your half
>>>>>>>>baked ego told you it would.
>>>>>>>>>Impersonating Griffin and repeatedly declaring victolly? What could
>>>>>>>>>that signify?
>>>>>>>>Cramps rule #1:
>>>>>>>>Everyone that does belly laughs at Cramps whines is Griffin. Ergo
>>>>>>>>hundreds of people on usenet must be impersonating griffin, daily.
>>>>>>>>Cramps Rule #2:
>>>>>>>>When all else fails, WHINE for help.
>>>>>>>It probably was tactical error to give you another thread in which to
>>>>>>>practice your continuing evasions, so I think I'll cease posting in
>>>>>>>this thread now, and focus on your kooky behavior in the other thread.
>>>>>>>See ya there!
>>>>>>Well, kooks do have a way of understating their idiocy.
>>>>>Don't they though!
>>>>Wow, you are on a roll. Such a come back.
>>>Yawn. How about we just go back to the other thread and you keep
>>>evading the question there?
>>Wow, a yawn too. Damn, yer just like the best at puttin worms on
>>hooks.
>
>Erm, how many times did you respond to me over the span of about 20
>minutes? And yet, even after all that, you still can't give a straight
>yes or no answer to the question

What is being asked? What do we win if we get it right?

Jade

On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:56:12 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>miguel:
>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>miguel:
>>>>>>>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>miguel:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you're around, perhaps you're watching Aratzio spin spin spin like
>>>>>>>>>>>a pinwheel on steroids. This is quite reminiscent of the exceptional
>>>>>>>>>>>spinwheel imitation Sharon B did lo those many years ago.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>Recently you posted that the marker for kooks is that they can't admit
>>>>>>>>>>>they are wrong.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>Just sayin'
>
>>>>>>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>>>>>>>>>>Crampie, begging for help cause he got his tit in the wringer, again.
>>>>>>>>>Message-ID: <fqfp8a$24l$1@blue.rahul.net>
>>>>>>>>>"As I've said before ... if they knew when to stop, they wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>>kooks. (I'll add "if they knew when to admit they were wrong" to
>>>>>>>>>that.)"
>>>>>>>>You can end your embarrassing display whe