On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:04:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, Meat Plow
<meat@pettymorty.com> bloviated:

>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.

<Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">

Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
little on the stupid side when you read that?

Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.

Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.

But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.

On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:30:37 +0000, Aratzio wrote:

> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:04:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, Meat Plow
> <meat@pettymorty.com> bloviated:
>
>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
>
> <Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
>
> Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
> little on the stupid side when you read that?
>
> Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
> poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
>
> Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
> blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
> 50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
> girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
> of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>
> But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
> you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.

I don't think Cranstard will be able to figure out which hook is which.

\
\
_______________________________________\__________ _
|
,__ |
| `'. |
__ |`-._/_.:---`-.._ |
\='. _/..--'`__ `'-._ |
\- '-.--"` === ----/--(O)-|', |
)= ( --_ | _.'|
/_=.'-._ {=_-_ | .--`-.=/
/_.' `\`'-._ '-= \ \\\\./
jgs ) _.-'`'-.. _..-- ~/
/_.' `/";';`|
\` .'/
'--'

Aratzio wrote:
>Meat Plow:

>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.

><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">

>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>little on the stupid side when you read that?

Oh, was that all there was to it?

>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.

What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?

>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.

Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.

>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.

I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
still fighting furiously. Keep it up.

On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:17:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>Meat Plow:
>
>>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
>
>><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
>
>>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>>little on the stupid side when you read that?
>
>Oh, was that all there was to it?
>
>>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
>
>What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
>exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
>age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
>personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?

So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.

>
>>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>
>Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
>wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.

Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.

>
>>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.
>
>I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
>still fighting furiously. Keep it up.

"I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"

You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.

Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
desperately needs?

We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.

Aratzio wrote:
>miguel:
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>Meat Plow:

>>>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.

>>><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">

>>>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>>>little on the stupid side when you read that?

>>Oh, was that all there was to it?

>>>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>>>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.

>>What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
>>exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
>>age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
>>personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?

>So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
>you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.

I don't know if any anthropologist has yet established that the
Timoran culture is rich with history of fathers pimping out their
barely of age daughters to foreigners who can throw some cash around.
Until we've established this as a cultural artifact, it's premature to
label such a foreigner a hero.

But it's not about the culture. It's about the personality who, having
no connection with that culture, would brag about exploiting it. Maybe
Kali will answer the question.

Don't you feel the slightest bit of embarrassment in playing the "you
ethnocentric bastard" card to evade a simple question?

>>>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>>>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>>>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>>>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>>>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>
>>Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
>>wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.

>Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.

>>>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>>>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.

>>I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
>>still fighting furiously. Keep it up.

>"I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"

So that isn't the standard for victolly?

>You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
>with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
>irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
>that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
>every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
>sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.

>Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
>desperately needs?

>We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.

I feel kind of sorry for anybody who would find that insightful or
entertaining. But I digress.

How about answering the question?

miguel <mjc101@gmail.com> wrote:

> What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
> exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
> age and who are being pimped out by their fathers?

One of the best troll-UPA artists even to grace usenet you fsckin perpetual
n00b13.
FYI

--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\__\ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/:/ _/_ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \ \:\ \
/:/ /::\ \ _____\:\ \ ___ \:\ \ ___ /::\ \
/:/_/:/\:\__\ /::::::::\__\ /\ \ \:\__\ /\ /:/\:\__\
\:\/:/ /:/ / \:\~~\~~\/__/ \:\ \ /:/ / \:\/:/ \/__/
\::/ /:/ / \:\ \ \:\ /:/ / \::/__/
\/_/:/ / \:\ \ \:\/:/ / \:\ \
/:/ / \:\__\ \::/ / \:\__\
\/__/ \/__/ \/__/ \/__/


+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+
|S|a|y| |D|u|h| |t|o| |A|y|n| |R|a|n|d|
+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+ +-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+

On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:09:53 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
<mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Aratzio wrote:
>>miguel:
>>>Aratzio wrote:
>>>>Meat Plow:
>
>>>>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>>>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>>>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
>
>>>><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
>
>>>>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>>>>little on the stupid side when you read that?
>
>>>Oh, was that all there was to it?
>
>>>>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>>>>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
>
>>>What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
>>>exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
>>>age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
>>>personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?
>
>>So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
>>you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.
>
>I don't know if any anthropologist has yet established that the
>Timoran culture is rich with history of fathers pimping out their
>barely of age daughters to foreigners who can throw some cash around.

And yet you are willing to shove your own cultural bias to the fore
without actually knowing.

>Until we've established this as a cultural artifact, it's premature to
>label such a foreigner a hero.

Hero? Why would you imagine that.

>
>But it's not about the culture. It's about the personality who, having
>no connection with that culture, would brag about exploiting it.

Or the tard that is swinging on the hook.

> Maybe Kali will answer the question.

Want to go out on a limb and guess?

>
>Don't you feel the slightest bit of embarrassment in playing the "you
>ethnocentric bastard" card to evade a simple question?

<checks>
Hrmm, why would I not point out your bigotry?

>
>>>>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>>>>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>>>>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>>>>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>>>>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>>
>>>Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
>>>wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.
>
>>Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.
>

At least you are starting to show some sense.

>>>>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>>>>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.
>
>>>I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
>>>still fighting furiously. Keep it up.
>
>>"I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"
>
>So that isn't the standard for victolly?

Only in your lil attention whore world.

>
>>You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
>>with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
>>irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
>>that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
>>every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
>>sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.
>
>>Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
>>desperately needs?
>
>>We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.
>
>I feel kind of sorry for anybody who would find that insightful or
>entertaining. But I digress.

Seeing as how you are the butt of the joke, that would seem to be your
standard perspective.
..

>
>How about answering the question?

How about asking again.

In <irr2t35b1al1a0geemh7j3shlp8jb5qru0@4ax.com>, Aratzio
a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com said:
: On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:17:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
: <mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:
:
: >Aratzio wrote:
: >>Meat Plow:
: >
: >>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
: >>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
: >>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
: >
: >><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
: >
: >>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
: >>little on the stupid side when you read that?
: >
: >Oh, was that all there was to it?
: >
: >>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
: >>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
: >
: >What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
: >exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
: >age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
: >personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?
:
: So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
: you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.
:
: >
: >>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
: >>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
: >>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
: >>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
: >>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
: >
: >Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
: >wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.
:
: Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.
:
: >
: >>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
: >>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.
: >
: >I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
: >still fighting furiously. Keep it up.
:
: "I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"
:
: You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
: with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
: irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
: that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
: every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
: sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.
:
: Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
: desperately needs?
:
: We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.

Ok, so you can make him sit up and beg. Over and over. And again
and again. What other tricks can you make him do? I think he
should earn his attention.

--
Kali

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:57:46 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, Kali
<kali@powder.keg> got double secret probation for writing:

>In <irr2t35b1al1a0geemh7j3shlp8jb5qru0@4ax.com>, Aratzio
>a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com said:
>: On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:17:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
>: <mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:
>:
>: >Aratzio wrote:
>: >>Meat Plow:
>: >
>: >>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>: >>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>: >>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
>: >
>: >><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
>: >
>: >>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>: >>little on the stupid side when you read that?
>: >
>: >Oh, was that all there was to it?
>: >
>: >>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>: >>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
>: >
>: >What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
>: >exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
>: >age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
>: >personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?
>:
>: So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
>: you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.
>:
>: >
>: >>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>: >>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>: >>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>: >>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>: >>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>: >
>: >Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
>: >wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.
>:
>: Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.
>:
>: >
>: >>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>: >>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.
>: >
>: >I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
>: >still fighting furiously. Keep it up.
>:
>: "I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"
>:
>: You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
>: with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
>: irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
>: that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
>: every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
>: sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.
>:
>: Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
>: desperately needs?
>:
>: We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.
>
>Ok, so you can make him sit up and beg. Over and over. And again
>and again. What other tricks can you make him do? I think he
>should earn his attention.

He's pretty stupid, it may be the limit of his ability. There may be
some rote routines we can embed using scooby snacks but I am less than
optimistic.


--

Miguel, once again stating the obvious:

Message-ID: <9ukjs35elqfmo5p9llamc0fle67jtuu24r@4ax.com>

"Yes, I must be impotent."

Aratzio wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:57:46 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, Kali
> <kali@powder.keg> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>In <irr2t35b1al1a0geemh7j3shlp8jb5qru0@4ax.com>, Aratzio
>>a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com said:
>>: On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:17:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
>>: <mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:
>>:
>>: >Aratzio wrote:
>>: >>Meat Plow:
>>: >
>>: >>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>: >>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>: >>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
>>: >
>>: >><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
>>: >
>>: >>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>>: >>little on the stupid side when you read that?
>>: >
>>: >Oh, was that all there was to it?
>>: >
>>: >>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>>: >>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
>>: >
>>: >What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
>>: >exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
>>: >age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
>>: >personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?
>>:
>>: So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
>>: you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.
>>:
>>: >
>>: >>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>>: >>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>>: >>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>>: >>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>>: >>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>>: >
>>: >Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
>>: >wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.
>>:
>>: Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.
>>:
>>: >
>>: >>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>>: >>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.
>>: >
>>: >I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
>>: >still fighting furiously. Keep it up.
>>:
>>: "I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"
>>:
>>: You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
>>: with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
>>: irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
>>: that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
>>: every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
>>: sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.
>>:
>>: Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
>>: desperately needs?
>>:
>>: We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.
>>
>>Ok, so you can make him sit up and beg. Over and over. And again
>>and again. What other tricks can you make him do? I think he
>>should earn his attention.
>
> He's pretty stupid, it may be the limit of his ability. There may be
> some rote routines we can embed using scooby snacks but I am less than
> optimistic.

Have you tried kippers?

One can literally move mountains (our own Crag is a really big (and we don't
take that lightly) fan of those).
--
ah

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:04:47 -0400, in alt.aratzio, ah
<splifingate@gmail.com> bloviated:

>Aratzio wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:57:46 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, Kali
>> <kali@powder.keg> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>In <irr2t35b1al1a0geemh7j3shlp8jb5qru0@4ax.com>, Aratzio
>>>a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com said:
>>>: On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:17:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
>>>: <mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:
>>>:
>>>: >Aratzio wrote:
>>>: >>Meat Plow:
>>>: >
>>>: >>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>>: >>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>>: >>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
>>>: >
>>>: >><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
>>>: >
>>>: >>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>>>: >>little on the stupid side when you read that?
>>>: >
>>>: >Oh, was that all there was to it?
>>>: >
>>>: >>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>>>: >>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
>>>: >
>>>: >What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
>>>: >exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
>>>: >age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
>>>: >personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?
>>>:
>>>: So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
>>>: you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.
>>>:
>>>: >
>>>: >>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>>>: >>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>>>: >>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>>>: >>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>>>: >>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>>>: >
>>>: >Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
>>>: >wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.
>>>:
>>>: Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.
>>>:
>>>: >
>>>: >>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>>>: >>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.
>>>: >
>>>: >I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
>>>: >still fighting furiously. Keep it up.
>>>:
>>>: "I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"
>>>:
>>>: You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
>>>: with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
>>>: irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
>>>: that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
>>>: every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
>>>: sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.
>>>:
>>>: Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
>>>: desperately needs?
>>>:
>>>: We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.
>>>
>>>Ok, so you can make him sit up and beg. Over and over. And again
>>>and again. What other tricks can you make him do? I think he
>>>should earn his attention.
>>
>> He's pretty stupid, it may be the limit of his ability. There may be
>> some rote routines we can embed using scooby snacks but I am less than
>> optimistic.
>
>Have you tried kippers?

Embedded kippers?

>
>One can literally move mountains (our own Crag is a really big (and we don't
>take that lightly) fan of those).

I've heard kippers can cause large movements.

Aratzio wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:04:47 -0400, in alt.aratzio, ah
> <splifingate@gmail.com> bloviated:
>
>>Aratzio wrote:
>>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:57:46 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio, Kali
>>> <kali@powder.keg> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>In <irr2t35b1al1a0geemh7j3shlp8jb5qru0@4ax.com>, Aratzio
>>>>a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com said:
>>>>: On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:17:23 -0800, in alt.aratzio, miguel
>>>>: <mjc101@gmail.com> bloviated:
>>>>:
>>>>: >Aratzio wrote:
>>>>: >>Meat Plow:
>>>>: >
>>>>: >>>Mebe we should just admite that we was wrong to tell Rhon dumb to
>>>>: >>>anser yes or noe to that question. Then u won't haveto say K-Mans
>>>>: >>>stuff was sick an you wudlnt let him babysit ur girl.
>>>>: >
>>>>: >><Cramps sock up for another "Ode to Ratz">
>>>>: >
>>>>: >>Hey, Cramps, what was sick about *soon to be of age*? Were you a
>>>>: >>little on the stupid side when you read that?
>>>>: >
>>>>: >Oh, was that all there was to it?
>>>>: >
>>>>: >>Or maybe your self-centered cultural beliefs make you feel superior to
>>>>: >>poor Timoran villagers living hand to mouth.
>>>>: >
>>>>: >What kind of personality would brag about exploiting that to get an
>>>>: >exceptionally good deal on the prostitution of girls who are barely of
>>>>: >age and who are being pimped out by their fathers? The kind of
>>>>: >personality you would like to have babysit your daughter?
>>>>:
>>>>: So then yes, you do feel that smug cultural superiority. So nice of
>>>>: you to be able to denigrate those timoran people.
>>>>:
>>>>: >
>>>>: >>Maybe you could make up multiple paragraphs of non sequiturs and
>>>>: >>blathering tripe just so you can say that you might actually allow a
>>>>: >>50+ years old man who writes pedo fantasies to babysit a 12 years old
>>>>: >>girl. Because it all would depend on how you rationalize the concept
>>>>: >>of a 50+ year old man writing sick pedo fantasies.
>>>>: >
>>>>: >Or maybe you could just answer the question. Would you let someone who
>>>>: >wrote that babysit your daughter? Yes or no.
>>>>:
>>>>: Poor cramps, impotently begs, again.
>>>>:
>>>>: >
>>>>: >>But first you should take kman's hook outta your mouth. Don't know how
>>>>: >>you are going to be able to choose which is his, but do give it a try.
>>>>: >
>>>>: >I thought you'd shaken my hook last night, but I'm glad to see you're
>>>>: >still fighting furiously. Keep it up.
>>>>:
>>>>: "I AM WINNING, YOU RESPONDED"
>>>>:
>>>>: You sure of that, cramps? How long will you be obsessively pleading
>>>>: with me to answer your illiterate, contextually challenged and
>>>>: irrelevant question? Weeks, months, years? Could this be the question
>>>>: that no oracle could answer for you. The question that defines your
>>>>: every waking moment. That question that left unanswered causes you
>>>>: sleepless nights as you agonize over the ramifications.
>>>>:
>>>>: Will no one take pity upon poor cramps and give him the answer he so
>>>>: desperately needs?
>>>>:
>>>>: We will return to "As the Cramps Spins" after these messages.
>>>>
>>>>Ok, so you can make him sit up and beg. Over and over. And again
>>>>and again. What other tricks can you make him do? I think he
>>>>should earn his attention.
>>>
>>> He's pretty stupid, it may be the limit of his ability. There may be
>>> some rote routines we can embed using scooby snacks but I am less than
>>> optimistic.
>>
>>Have you tried kippers?
>
> Embedded kippers?

Only with i.e.

>
>>
>>One can literally move mountains (our own Crag is a really big (and we don't
>>take that lightly) fan of those).
>
> I've heard kippers can cause large movements.

You have no idea.
--
ah