la meilleure série de science fiction s'éteint

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:26:21 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, clint mourlevat <> arranged
some electrons, so they looked like this:

... la meilleure série de science fiction s'éteint

Il était temps! Je n'avais pas envie de voir O'Neill sur une chaise roulante en train de
tirer sur Apophis...


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!

SAC 441 wrote:
> Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!

Ik ook niet.

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!

Ich verstehe dich!


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Magda wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441) arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
>
> ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
>
> Ich verstehe dich!
>

En begrijp je mij ook?

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:57:45 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda wrote:
... > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441) arranged some electrons, so they looked
... > like this:
... >
... > ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
... >
... > Ich verstehe dich!
... >
...
... En begrijp je mij ook?

Of course I do, neighbour! (Well, I guess, actually... ;))


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:nnctu394i3dtbb6is5reg7n1j1b71675cv@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
>
> Ich verstehe dich!


Ja vam taky rozumim!

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... news:nnctu394i3dtbb6is5reg7n1j1b71675cv@4ax.com...
... > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
... > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
... >
... > ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
... >
... > Ich verstehe dich!
...
...
... Ja vam taky rozumim!

Agora tu estás exagerando!


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Magda wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:57:45 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
> Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ... > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> ... > SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441) arranged some electrons, so they
> looked ... > like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
> ... >
> ... > Ich verstehe dich!
> ... >
> ...
> ... En begrijp je mij ook?
>
> Of course I do, neighbour! (Well, I guess, actually... ;))

Good! ;-)

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

Magda wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked like this:
>
> ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> ... news:nnctu394i3dtbb6is5reg7n1j1b71675cv@4ax.com...
> ... > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> ... > SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
> ... > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
> ... >
> ... > Ich verstehe dich!
> ...
> ...
> ... Ja vam taky rozumim!

Something about tacky roses?
I don't even recognize the language.

>
> Agora tu estás exagerando!

Spanish?

Okay, now you've lost me completely.

We need Daniel Jackson I think. :-)

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda wrote:
... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
... > looked like this:
... >
... > ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... > ... news:nnctu394i3dtbb6is5reg7n1j1b71675cv@4ax.com...
... > ... > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > ... > SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
... > ... > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
... > ... >
... > ... > ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
... > ... >
... > ... > Ich verstehe dich!
... > ...
... > ...
... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
...
... Something about tacky roses?
... I don't even recognize the language.

Croat?

... >
... > Agora tu estás exagerando!
...
... Spanish?

Try again.

... Okay, now you've lost me completely.
...
... We need Daniel Jackson I think. :-)

=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Magda wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
> Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked like this:
> ... >
> ... > Agora tu estás exagerando!
> ...
> ... Spanish?
>
> Try again.
>

Okay.
That 'tu' part reminds of French, but shouldn't that be followed by 'et', as
in 'tu et', in which the 't' in 'et' isn't pronounced.... Or was that 'tu
est'??
Who is Agora? If not some type of wool. Or is that Angora? My mind is a bit
fuzzy here.
The 'exagerando' part...
It could be Portuguese or Italian (or some other latin based language) for
'Agora, you are exaggerating!'
I'm making things up as I go along.
A true polyglot I'll never be, although I did learn some French 28 years ago
when I was 14 (but never read or spoke it after that).
That's why it's good to have a lingua franka.

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:12:21 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda wrote:
... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
... > Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they
... > looked like this:
... > ... >
... > ... > Agora tu estás exagerando!
... > ...
... > ... Spanish?
... >
... > Try again.
... >
...
... Okay.
... That 'tu' part reminds of French, but shouldn't that be followed by 'et', as
... in 'tu et', in which the 't' in 'et' isn't pronounced.... Or was that 'tu
... est'??
... Who is Agora? If not some type of wool. Or is that Angora? My mind is a bit
... fuzzy here.
... The 'exagerando' part...
... It could be Portuguese or Italian (or some other latin based language) for
... 'Agora, you are exaggerating!'
... I'm making things up as I go along.
... A true polyglot I'll never be, although I did learn some French 28 years ago
... when I was 14 (but never read or spoke it after that).
... That's why it's good to have a lingua franka.

There is no x in Italian.

Agora = now.

Gotcha! ;)

=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:c2pvu35qt71o7s5gnob1osr86ro225keb0@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
> Valentijn"
> <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> ... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
> ... > looked like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> ... > ... news:nnctu394i3dtbb6is5reg7n1j1b71675cv@4ax.com...
> ... > ... > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> ... > ... > SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
> ... > ... > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... > ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... > Ich verstehe dich!
> ... > ...
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
> ...
> ... Something about tacky roses?
> ... I don't even recognize the language.
>
> Croat?


Czech. Really, Magda! <g>

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

TECHNICALLY,there is no 'X' in Italian alphabetization.However,when I
was there in 1967
(as a 12 year old kid) they DID use that letter in
some commercial applications like names of companies.It is not an
absolute.

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:37:44 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... TECHNICALLY,there is no 'X' in Italian alphabetization.However,when I
... was there in 1967
... (as a 12 year old kid) they DID use that letter in
... some commercial applications like names of companies.It is not an
... absolute.

Open an Italian dictionary on the X page. It's very funny! :)


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:04:43 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... news:c2pvu35qt71o7s5gnob1osr86ro225keb0@4ax.com...
... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
... > Valentijn"
... > <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
... >
... > ... Magda wrote:
... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
... > ... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
... > ... > looked like this:
... > ... >
... > ... > ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... > ... > ... news:nnctu394i3dtbb6is5reg7n1j1b71675cv@4ax.com...
... > ... > ... > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:24:51 -0700, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > ... > ... > SAC441@webtv.net (SAC 441)
... > ... > ... > arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
... > ... > ... >
... > ... > ... > ... Ich kann Sie nicht verstehen!
... > ... > ... >
... > ... > ... > Ich verstehe dich!
... > ... > ...
... > ... > ...
... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
... > ...
... > ... Something about tacky roses?
... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
... >
... > Croat?
...
...
... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>

Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the planet, was I? ;))

=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Magda wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:12:21 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
> Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> "Wouter ... > Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons,
> so they ... > looked like this:
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... > Agora tu estás exagerando!
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Spanish?
> ... >
> ... > Try again.
> ... >
> ...
> ... Okay.
> ... That 'tu' part reminds of French, but shouldn't that be followed
> by 'et', as ... in 'tu et', in which the 't' in 'et' isn't
> pronounced.... Or was that 'tu ... est'??
> ... Who is Agora? If not some type of wool. Or is that Angora? My
> mind is a bit ... fuzzy here.
> ... The 'exagerando' part...
> ... It could be Portuguese or Italian (or some other latin based
> language) for ... 'Agora, you are exaggerating!'
> ... I'm making things up as I go along.
> ... A true polyglot I'll never be, although I did learn some French
> 28 years ago ... when I was 14 (but never read or spoke it after
> that). ... That's why it's good to have a lingua franka.
>
> There is no x in Italian.

Poor Italians!

>
> Agora = now.

Okay....

>
> Gotcha! ;)

You got me why?


Okay. So far we have "Now you are.... " and then what?
Or do you mean it was actually Portuguese?
In which case it would mean 'Now you're exaggerating.'

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:45:45 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda wrote:
... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:12:21 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
... > Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they
... > looked like this:
... >
... > ... Magda wrote:
... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > "Wouter ... > Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons,
... > so they ... > looked like this:
... > ... > ... >
... > ... > ... > Agora tu estás exagerando!
... > ... > ...
... > ... > ... Spanish?
... > ... >
... > ... > Try again.
... > ... >
... > ...
... > ... Okay.
... > ... That 'tu' part reminds of French, but shouldn't that be followed
... > by 'et', as ... in 'tu et', in which the 't' in 'et' isn't
... > pronounced.... Or was that 'tu ... est'??
... > ... Who is Agora? If not some type of wool. Or is that Angora? My
... > mind is a bit ... fuzzy here.
... > ... The 'exagerando' part...
... > ... It could be Portuguese or Italian (or some other latin based
... > language) for ... 'Agora, you are exaggerating!'
... > ... I'm making things up as I go along.
... > ... A true polyglot I'll never be, although I did learn some French
... > 28 years ago ... when I was 14 (but never read or spoke it after
... > that). ... That's why it's good to have a lingua franka.
... >
... > There is no x in Italian.
...
... Poor Italians!
...
... >
... > Agora = now.
...
... Okay....
...
... >
... > Gotcha! ;)
...
... You got me why?

The real question is "how".
...
... Okay. So far we have "Now you are.... " and then what?
... Or do you mean it was actually Portuguese?
... In which case it would mean 'Now you're exaggerating.'

Now you've got it!


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Magda wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:45:45 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
> Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:12:21 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> "Wouter ... > Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons,
> so they ... > looked like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... Magda wrote:
> ... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in
> alt.tv.stargate-sg1, ... > "Wouter ... > Valentijn"
> <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, ... > so they ... >
> looked like this: ... > ... > ... >
> ... > ... > ... > Agora tu estás exagerando!
> ... > ... > ...
> ... > ... > ... Spanish?
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... > Try again.
> ... > ... >
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Okay.
> ... > ... That 'tu' part reminds of French, but shouldn't that be
> followed ... > by 'et', as ... in 'tu et', in which the 't' in 'et'
> isn't ... > pronounced.... Or was that 'tu ... est'??
> ... > ... Who is Agora? If not some type of wool. Or is that Angora?
> My ... > mind is a bit ... fuzzy here.
> ... > ... The 'exagerando' part...
> ... > ... It could be Portuguese or Italian (or some other latin based
> ... > language) for ... 'Agora, you are exaggerating!'
> ... > ... I'm making things up as I go along.
> ... > ... A true polyglot I'll never be, although I did learn some
> French ... > 28 years ago ... when I was 14 (but never read or spoke
> it after ... > that). ... That's why it's good to have a lingua
> franka. ... >
> ... > There is no x in Italian.
> ...
> ... Poor Italians!
> ...
> ... >
> ... > Agora = now.
> ...
> ... Okay....
> ...
> ... >
> ... > Gotcha! ;)
> ...
> ... You got me why?
>
> The real question is "how".

You got me .... how?

Or did you mean by 'gotcha' something like 'you got it' (aka 'Bingo!') and
not 'I got you'?


> ...
> ... Okay. So far we have "Now you are.... " and then what?
> ... Or do you mean it was actually Portuguese?
> ... In which case it would mean 'Now you're exaggerating.'
>
> Now you've got it!

At last!

So, now what did "Ja vam taky rozumim!" mean? I'm starting to think it has
nothing to do with 'tacky roses'.

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail


>
>
> =====
> It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:15:09 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda wrote:
... > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:45:45 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
... > Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they
... > looked like this:
... >
... > ... Magda wrote:
... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:12:21 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > "Wouter ... > Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons,
... > so they ... > looked like this:
... > ... >
... > ... > ... Magda wrote:
... > ... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in
... > alt.tv.stargate-sg1, ... > "Wouter ... > Valentijn"
... > <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, ... > so they ... >
... > looked like this: ... > ... > ... >
... > ... > ... > ... > Agora tu estás exagerando!
... > ... > ... > ...
... > ... > ... > ... Spanish?
... > ... > ... >
... > ... > ... > Try again.
... > ... > ... >
... > ... > ...
... > ... > ... Okay.
... > ... > ... That 'tu' part reminds of French, but shouldn't that be
... > followed ... > by 'et', as ... in 'tu et', in which the 't' in 'et'
... > isn't ... > pronounced.... Or was that 'tu ... est'??
... > ... > ... Who is Agora? If not some type of wool. Or is that Angora?
... > My ... > mind is a bit ... fuzzy here.
... > ... > ... The 'exagerando' part...
... > ... > ... It could be Portuguese or Italian (or some other latin based
... > ... > language) for ... 'Agora, you are exaggerating!'
... > ... > ... I'm making things up as I go along.
... > ... > ... A true polyglot I'll never be, although I did learn some
... > French ... > 28 years ago ... when I was 14 (but never read or spoke
... > it after ... > that). ... That's why it's good to have a lingua
... > franka. ... >
... > ... > There is no x in Italian.
... > ...
... > ... Poor Italians!
... > ...
... > ... >
... > ... > Agora = now.
... > ...
... > ... Okay....
... > ...
... > ... >
... > ... > Gotcha! ;)
... > ...
... > ... You got me why?
... >
... > The real question is "how".
...
... You got me .... how?

It was not Spanish. People are so predictable! Any vaguely Latin-derived language is
always labelled "Spanish". A little imagination, people!

... Or did you mean by 'gotcha' something like 'you got it' (aka 'Bingo!') and
... not 'I got you'?
...
...
... > ...
... > ... Okay. So far we have "Now you are.... " and then what?
... > ... Or do you mean it was actually Portuguese?
... > ... In which case it would mean 'Now you're exaggerating.'
... >
... > Now you've got it!
...
... At last!
...
... So, now what did "Ja vam taky rozumim!" mean? I'm starting to think it has
... nothing to do with 'tacky roses'.

Let's ask Eva.


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Magda wrote:



> ...
> ... So, now what did "Ja vam taky rozumim!" mean? I'm starting to
> think it has ... nothing to do with 'tacky roses'.
>
> Let's ask Eva.

'rozunim' can mean:
mind, wittiness, wit, wisdom, understanding, sense, sconce, reason,
intelligence, intellect, head, brain (or so an internet site claims).

And since Eva was getting in the spirit of things I'm willing to wager she
was saying something like:

"I can understand you."


--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:05:05 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda wrote:
...
...
...
... > ...
... > ... So, now what did "Ja vam taky rozumim!" mean? I'm starting to
... > think it has ... nothing to do with 'tacky roses'.
... >
... > Let's ask Eva.
...
... 'rozunim' can mean:

I'm hoping it was a typo!

... mind, wittiness, wit, wisdom, understanding, sense, sconce, reason,
... intelligence, intellect, head, brain (or so an internet site claims).
...
... And since Eva was getting in the spirit of things I'm willing to wager she
... was saying something like:
...
... "I can understand you."

Too?


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:73l2v35ic2eccffudn5538rd4lj9d1d62b@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:05:05 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
> Valentijn"
> <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... Magda wrote:
> ...
> ...
> ...
> ... > ...
> ... > ... So, now what did "Ja vam taky rozumim!" mean? I'm starting to
> ... > think it has ... nothing to do with 'tacky roses'.
> ... >
> ... > Let's ask Eva.
> ...
> ... 'rozunim' can mean:
>
> I'm hoping it was a typo!
>
> ... mind, wittiness, wit, wisdom, understanding, sense, sconce, reason,
> ... intelligence, intellect, head, brain (or so an internet site claims).
> ...
> ... And since Eva was getting in the spirit of things I'm willing to wager
> she
> ... was saying something like:
> ...
> ... "I can understand you."
>
> Too?


Who needs Eva? :-) Yes, that's what it was, literally "I you also
understand." We usually do not bother with 'can' in a sentence like that. I
did like the tacky roses idea though!

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:mbp0v3lp88hf6frso80vn9grp2itildqv2@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:04:43 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
> ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> ... news:c2pvu35qt71o7s5gnob1osr86ro225keb0@4ax.com...
> ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
> ... > Valentijn"
> ... > <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like
> this:
> ... > ... Magda wrote:
> ... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> "Eva"
> ... > ... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so
> they
> ... > ... > looked like this:

<snip>

> ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
> ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
> ... >
> ... > Croat?
> ...
> ...
> ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
>
> Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the planet, was I?
> ;))

LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... news:mbp0v3lp88hf6frso80vn9grp2itildqv2@4ax.com...
... > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:04:43 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
... > like this:
... > ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... > ... news:c2pvu35qt71o7s5gnob1osr86ro225keb0@4ax.com...
... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
... > ... > Valentijn"
... > ... > <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like
... > this:
... > ... > ... Magda wrote:
... > ... > ... > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:53:22 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > "Eva"
... > ... > ... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so
... > they
... > ... > ... > looked like this:
...
... <snip>
...
... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
... > ... > ...
... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
... > ... >
... > ... > Croat?
... > ...
... > ...
... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
... >
... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the planet, was I?
... > ;))
...
... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>

No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would say you were from
somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or Antarctica.

=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Eva wrote:
> "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> news:73l2v35ic2eccffudn5538rd4lj9d1d62b@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:05:05 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
>> Valentijn"
>> <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like
>> this: ... Magda wrote:
>> ...
>> ...
>> ...
>> ... > ...
>> ... > ... So, now what did "Ja vam taky rozumim!" mean? I'm starting
>> to ... > think it has ... nothing to do with 'tacky roses'.
>> ... >
>> ... > Let's ask Eva.
>> ...
>> ... 'rozunim' can mean:
>>
>> I'm hoping it was a typo!

Yes, there was a typo. That 'n' should have been an 'm'.
Is there any special meaning to that word (with the 'n')?


>>
>> ... mind, wittiness, wit, wisdom, understanding, sense, sconce,
>> reason, ... intelligence, intellect, head, brain (or so an internet
>> site claims). ...
>> ... And since Eva was getting in the spirit of things I'm willing to
>> wager she
>> ... was saying something like:
>> ...
>> ... "I can understand you."
>>
>> Too?
>
>
> Who needs Eva? :-) Yes, that's what it was, literally "I you also
> understand." We usually do not bother with 'can' in a sentence like
> that. I did like the tacky roses idea though!
>

I'm glad you liked it. :-)


--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

Magda wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
> looked like this:

<snip>

> ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
> ... > ... > ...
> ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
> ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
> ... > ... >
> ... > ... > Croat?
> ... > ...
> ... > ...
> ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
> ... >
> ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
> planet, was I? ... > ;))
> ...
> ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
>
> No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would say
> you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or Antarctica.

The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:32:01 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Eva wrote:
... > "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... > news:73l2v35ic2eccffudn5538rd4lj9d1d62b@4ax.com...
... >> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:05:05 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter
... >> Valentijn"
... >> <liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like
... >> this: ... Magda wrote:
... >> ...
... >> ...
... >> ...
... >> ... > ...
... >> ... > ... So, now what did "Ja vam taky rozumim!" mean? I'm starting
... >> to ... > think it has ... nothing to do with 'tacky roses'.
... >> ... >
... >> ... > Let's ask Eva.
... >> ...
... >> ... 'rozunim' can mean:
... >>
... >> I'm hoping it was a typo!
...
... Yes, there was a typo. That 'n' should have been an 'm'.
... Is there any special meaning to that word (with the 'n')?

No idea, I don't speak Czech. But with some typos you could be calling someone's mother a
bad name, for all we (don't) know! Better be careful.

... >>
... >> ... mind, wittiness, wit, wisdom, understanding, sense, sconce,
... >> reason, ... intelligence, intellect, head, brain (or so an internet
... >> site claims). ...
... >> ... And since Eva was getting in the spirit of things I'm willing to
... >> wager she
... >> ... was saying something like:
... >> ...
... >> ... "I can understand you."
... >>
... >> Too?
... >
... >
... > Who needs Eva? :-) Yes, that's what it was, literally "I you also
... > understand." We usually do not bother with 'can' in a sentence like
... > that. I did like the tacky roses idea though!
... >
...
... I'm glad you liked it. :-)

=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:34:47 +0200, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Wouter Valentijn"
<liam@valentijn.nu> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda wrote:
... > On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
... > looked like this:
...
... <snip>
...
... > ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
... > ... > ... > ...
... > ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
... > ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
... > ... > ... >
... > ... > ... > Croat?
... > ... > ...
... > ... > ...
... > ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
... > ... >
... > ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
... > planet, was I? ... > ;))
... > ...
... > ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
... >
... > No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would say
... > you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or Antarctica.
...
... The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
... But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!

NOW you are talking! Eva, please justify yourself. What is an Ancient doing here? Are you
after Daniel too?


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

In article <47f27239$0$14354$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
"Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:

> Magda wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
> > looked like this:
>
> <snip>
>
> > ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
> > ... > ... > ...
> > ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
> > ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
> > ... > ... >
> > ... > ... > Croat?
> > ... > ...
> > ... > ...
> > ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
> > ... >
> > ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
> > planet, was I? ... > ;))
> > ...
> > ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
> >
> > No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would say
> > you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or Antarctica.
>
> The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
> But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!

Well, she's no spring chicken, but I think that was a bit harsh.

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg

Anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <47f27239$0$14354$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>
>> Magda wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
>>> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
>>> looked like this:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
>>> ... > ... > ...
>>> ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
>>> ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
>>> ... > ... >
>>> ... > ... > Croat?
>>> ... > ...
>>> ... > ...
>>> ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
>>> ... >
>>> ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
>>> planet, was I? ... > ;))
>>> ...
>>> ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
>>>
>>> No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would
>>> say you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or
>>> Antarctica.
>>
>> The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
>> But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!
>
> Well, she's no spring chicken, but I think that was a bit harsh.

Would you call something like this harsh?

http://www.freewebs.com/fsm2k4/ayiana.jpg

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

In article <47f27239$0$14354$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
Wouter Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>Magda wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
>> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
>> looked like this:
>
><snip>
>
>> ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
>> ... > ... > ...
>> ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
>> ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
>> ... > ... >
>> ... > ... > Croat?
>> ... > ...
>> ... > ...
>> ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
>> ... >
>> ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
>> planet, was I? ... > ;))
>> ...
>> ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
>>
>> No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would say
>> you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or Antarctica.
>
>The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
>But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!

I wondered if this was going to get back on topic at any point (not
complaining, just wondering *grin*)

Eva as an Ancient... I can see it.

Jill
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++
The colors blend, the edges soften. Swirling and mixing
we are becoming white light.
jill@tuells.org

"Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
news:47f2a0ba$0$14360$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>> In article <47f27239$0$14354$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
>> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>
>>> Magda wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
>>>> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
>>>> looked like this:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
>>>> ... > ... > ...
>>>> ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
>>>> ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
>>>> ... > ... >
>>>> ... > ... > Croat?
>>>> ... > ...
>>>> ... > ...
>>>> ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
>>>> ... >
>>>> ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
>>>> planet, was I? ... > ;))
>>>> ...
>>>> ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
>>>>
>>>> No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would
>>>> say you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or
>>>> Antarctica.
>>>
>>> The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
>>> But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!
>>
>> Well, she's no spring chicken, but I think that was a bit harsh.

LOL!!!

> Would you call something like this harsh?
>
> http://www.freewebs.com/fsm2k4/ayiana.jpg

You mean a silent killing machine? ;-)

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

"jill" <jill@tuells.org> wrote in message
news:7o6dnXiybujZnG7anZ2dnUVZ_vumnZ2d@rockynet.com ...
> In article <47f27239$0$14354$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
> Wouter Valentijn <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>Magda wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
>>> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
>>> looked like this:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>> ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
>>> ... > ... > ...
>>> ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
>>> ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
>>> ... > ... >
>>> ... > ... > Croat?
>>> ... > ...
>>> ... > ...
>>> ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
>>> ... >
>>> ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
>>> planet, was I? ... > ;))
>>> ...
>>> ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
>>>
>>> No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would say
>>> you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or Antarctica.

The middle of the Pacific - too hot. But Antarctica I will take any day!
:-)

>>The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.

Noooo! Have mercy...

>>But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!

I like. <g>

> I wondered if this was going to get back on topic at any point (not
> complaining, just wondering *grin*)

I am sure it wasn't on purpose. <g>

> Eva as an Ancient... I can see it.

Thank you. I think! I mean, that was a compliment, right?

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

Eva wrote:
> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
> news:47f2a0ba$0$14360$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>> In article <47f27239$0$14354$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
>>> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Magda wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
>>>>> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
>>>>> looked like this:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
>>>>> ... > ... > ...
>>>>> ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
>>>>> ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
>>>>> ... > ... >
>>>>> ... > ... > Croat?
>>>>> ... > ...
>>>>> ... > ...
>>>>> ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
>>>>> ... >
>>>>> ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
>>>>> planet, was I? ... > ;))
>>>>> ...
>>>>> ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would
>>>>> say you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or
>>>>> Antarctica.
>>>>
>>>> The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
>>>> But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!
>>>
>>> Well, she's no spring chicken, but I think that was a bit harsh.
>
> LOL!!!
>
>> Would you call something like this harsh?
>>
>> http://www.freewebs.com/fsm2k4/ayiana.jpg
>
> You mean a silent killing machine? ;-)
>

Ayiana was a healing machine.

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

"Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
news:47f3bd01$0$14343$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> Eva wrote:
>> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message

<snip>

>>> Would you call something like this harsh?
>>>
>>> http://www.freewebs.com/fsm2k4/ayiana.jpg
>>
>> You mean a silent killing machine? ;-)
>>
>
> Ayiana was a healing machine.

Not at first.

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

Eva wrote:
> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
> news:47f3bd01$0$14343$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>> Eva wrote:
>>> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> Would you call something like this harsh?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.freewebs.com/fsm2k4/ayiana.jpg
>>>
>>> You mean a silent killing machine? ;-)
>>>
>>
>> Ayiana was a healing machine.
>
> Not at first.
>

It's the way I'll always remember her.
As a beautiful, intelligent, caring woman.

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

"Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
news:47f3dd1f$0$14343$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> Eva wrote:
>> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
>> news:47f3bd01$0$14343$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>>> Eva wrote:
>>>> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> Would you call something like this harsh?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.freewebs.com/fsm2k4/ayiana.jpg
>>>>
>>>> You mean a silent killing machine? ;-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ayiana was a healing machine.
>>
>> Not at first.
>>
>
> It's the way I'll always remember her.
> As a beautiful, intelligent, caring woman.


I know. I was just messing. :-) I really felt sorry for her when her
Ancient mates left her by herself on Earth. It would have been more humane
to kill her, if they couldn't have cured her. I know what I would have
preferred.

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:52:23 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... > It's the way I'll always remember her.
... > As a beautiful, intelligent, caring woman.
...
...
... I know. I was just messing. :-) I really felt sorry for her when her
... Ancient mates left her by herself on Earth. It would have been more humane
... to kill her, if they couldn't have cured her. I know what I would have
... preferred.

But then she would not have saved a few humans, thousands of years later.


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:qqobv39u870hsv5iibf6b1mv10fju733bq@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:52:23 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
>
> ... > It's the way I'll always remember her.
> ... > As a beautiful, intelligent, caring woman.
> ...
> ...
> ... I know. I was just messing. :-) I really felt sorry for her when her
> ... Ancient mates left her by herself on Earth. It would have been more
> humane
> ... to kill her, if they couldn't have cured her. I know what I would
> have
> ... preferred.
>
> But then she would not have saved a few humans, thousands of years later.


Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:24:32 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... news:qqobv39u870hsv5iibf6b1mv10fju733bq@4ax.com...
... > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:52:23 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
... > like this:
... >
... > ... > It's the way I'll always remember her.
... > ... > As a beautiful, intelligent, caring woman.
... > ...
... > ...
... > ... I know. I was just messing. :-) I really felt sorry for her when her
... > ... Ancient mates left her by herself on Earth. It would have been more
... > humane
... > ... to kill her, if they couldn't have cured her. I know what I would
... > have
... > ... preferred.
... >
... > But then she would not have saved a few humans, thousands of years later.
...
... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?

Yes. No.

=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
> ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?

> Yes. No.

She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM though.
So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no difference at all
really...

Apart from O'niell getting tortured to death by Ba'al of course.
Absolutely nothing good came of her revival.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| spike1@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:48:20 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, spike1@freenet.co.uk arranged
some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
... > ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?
...
... > Yes. No.
...
... She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM though.
... So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no difference at all
... really...

The butterfly theory? Let's say the children of the people she saved (from her own illness
or not, it does not matter. She saved them, point) will accomplish something important.
Like finding another suitable planet once we have destroyed this one, which won't be long
now, yadda yadda.

... Apart from O'niell getting tortured to death by Ba'al of course.
... Absolutely nothing good came of her revival.

Yet.


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
> Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
>> ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?
>
>> Yes. No.
>
> She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM though.
> So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no difference at
> all really...

Not her fault.

>
> Apart from O'niell getting tortured to death by Ba'al of course.
> Absolutely nothing good came of her revival.

Not her fault.
And Ba'al is an ***.

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:tb3cv3p9pkm8r06jibebp8huegiloa8eqp@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:48:20 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> spike1@freenet.co.uk arranged
> some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
> ... > ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?
> ...
> ... > Yes. No.
> ...
> ... She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM though.
> ... So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no difference at
> all
> ... really...
>
> The butterfly theory? Let's say the children of the people she saved (from
> her own illness
> or not, it does not matter. She saved them, point) will accomplish
> something important.
> Like finding another suitable planet once we have destroyed this one,
> which won't be long
> now, yadda yadda.

You are missing the point here. If she had not been revived, nobody would
have got sick so there would have been nobody to save. No butterflies
involved since my point was she would have been better off dead. Dead = no
body to be found, no illness to be inflicted on others, no saving necessary,
status quo remains. The main reason for the episode was for O'Neill to get
sick and disappear for a while, since RDA hurt his knee (remember ;-) ) and
needed a bit of time off. If you look at his performance in "Frozen", he is
a bit more out of it than usual because he was on painkillers.

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:06:55 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
... news:tb3cv3p9pkm8r06jibebp8huegiloa8eqp@4ax.com...
... > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:48:20 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
... > spike1@freenet.co.uk arranged
... > some electrons, so they looked like this:
... >
... > ... Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
... > ... > ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?
... > ...
... > ... > Yes. No.
... > ...
... > ... She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM though.
... > ... So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no difference at
... > all
... > ... really...
... >
... > The butterfly theory? Let's say the children of the people she saved (from
... > her own illness
... > or not, it does not matter. She saved them, point) will accomplish
... > something important.
... > Like finding another suitable planet once we have destroyed this one,
... > which won't be long
... > now, yadda yadda.
...
... You are missing the point here. If she had not been revived, nobody would
... have got sick so there would have been nobody to save. No butterflies
... involved since my point was she would have been better off dead. Dead = no
... body to be found, no illness to be inflicted on others, no saving necessary,
... status quo remains. The main reason for the episode was for O'Neill to get
... sick and disappear for a while, since RDA hurt his knee (remember ;-) ) and
... needed a bit of time off. If you look at his performance in "Frozen", he is
... a bit more out of it than usual because he was on painkillers.

We would have been deprived of Abyss, and don't get me started on *missing Daniel's
comeback*, and then Jack saving that slave girl from Ba'al... Ok, I haven't watched
Stargate in a good while and don't remember all the details, but I do remember that the
Tok'ra didn't get out of the situation feeling very proud!

BTW, what's the actor who played Ba'al doing now? I like him.


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

A SLIGHT ACTOR SPOILER FOR "CONTINUUM" AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THIS POST, SO
IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW, DO NOT SCROLL DOWN.


"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:nhkev39pgva1buv98teid96iihc4nqdhl7@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:06:55 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
>
> ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> ... news:tb3cv3p9pkm8r06jibebp8huegiloa8eqp@4ax.com...
> ... > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:48:20 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> ... > spike1@freenet.co.uk arranged
> ... > some electrons, so they looked like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
> ... > ... > ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten
> something?
> ... > ...
> ... > ... > Yes. No.
> ... > ...
> ... > ... She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM
> though.
> ... > ... So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no
> difference at
> ... > all
> ... > ... really...
> ... >
> ... > The butterfly theory? Let's say the children of the people she saved
> (from
> ... > her own illness
> ... > or not, it does not matter. She saved them, point) will accomplish
> ... > something important.
> ... > Like finding another suitable planet once we have destroyed this
> one,
> ... > which won't be long
> ... > now, yadda yadda.
> ...
> ... You are missing the point here. If she had not been revived, nobody
> would
> ... have got sick so there would have been nobody to save. No butterflies
> ... involved since my point was she would have been better off dead. Dead
> = no
> ... body to be found, no illness to be inflicted on others, no saving
> necessary,
> ... status quo remains. The main reason for the episode was for O'Neill to
> get
> ... sick and disappear for a while, since RDA hurt his knee (remember
> ;-) ) and
> ... needed a bit of time off. If you look at his performance in "Frozen",
> he is
> ... a bit more out of it than usual because he was on painkillers.
>
> We would have been deprived of Abyss, ....

That could have been achieved by other means, they could have written a
different episode which almost kills Jack.

> ....and don't get me started on *missing Daniel's comeback*, ....

Ha! I would have gladly missed Daniel's comeback. Michael Shanks totally
ruined Daniel for me with his I-am-destined-for-greater-things attitude;
after his return I could never enjoy Daniel as much as I did before because
I started seeing MS, not Daniel.

> ...and then Jack saving that slave girl from Ba'al...

You romantic!

> Ok, I haven't watched
> Stargate in a good while and don't remember all the details, but I do
> remember that the
> Tok'ra didn't get out of the situation feeling very proud!

No, they didn't. Jack must have been ecstatic that his dislike and his
distrust of the Tok'ra was confirmed in this way; I bet he thought it was
worth all the pain. <g>

> BTW, what's the actor who played Ba'al doing now? I like him.

Here I was going to mark the next sentence as a spoiler but if I did that,
you could work out what the spoiler was anyway, so let me just say as
vaguely as I can that you will be happy to hear he will be in an SG-1 movie.
Which I didn't know until now so I got spoiled because of you. ;-Þ He
doesn't seem to be very busy with his TV career ATM but take a look here for
what he is doing now:

http://www.cliffsimon.com/


Eva


--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:48:45 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:


... > We would have been deprived of Abyss, ....
...
... That could have been achieved by other means, they could have written a
... different episode which almost kills Jack.

But not one where he would have accepted a snake in his head. This was the "important
point".

... > ....and don't get me started on *missing Daniel's comeback*, ....
...
... Ha! I would have gladly missed Daniel's comeback. Michael Shanks totally
... ruined Daniel for me with his I-am-destined-for-greater-things attitude;
... after his return I could never enjoy Daniel as much as I did before because
... I started seeing MS, not Daniel.

He surely was a little bitch. Daniel was never my favourite. I had gotten over his
leaving, only for him to come back and then almost leave again... Boring!

... > ...and then Jack saving that slave girl from Ba'al...
...
... You romantic!

She was cute. Pity Jack didn't fall for her...

... > Ok, I haven't watched
... > Stargate in a good while and don't remember all the details, but I do
... > remember that the
... > Tok'ra didn't get out of the situation feeling very proud!
...
... No, they didn't. Jack must have been ecstatic that his dislike and his
... distrust of the Tok'ra was confirmed in this way; I bet he thought it was
... worth all the pain. <g>

He surely had a point there.

... > BTW, what's the actor who played Ba'al doing now? I like him.
...
... Here I was going to mark the next sentence as a spoiler but if I did that,
... you could work out what the spoiler was anyway, so let me just say as
... vaguely as I can that you will be happy to hear he will be in an SG-1 movie.
... Which I didn't know until now so I got spoiled because of you. ;-Þ

Don't hate me! ;))

He
... doesn't seem to be very busy with his TV career ATM but take a look here for
... what he is doing now:
...
... http://www.cliffsimon.com/

Miam! :)))


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:nroev3lgmj0p250p8j6qrt9i0j0orh75kd@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:48:45 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
>
>
> ... > We would have been deprived of Abyss, ....
> ...
> ... That could have been achieved by other means, they could have written
> a
> ... different episode which almost kills Jack.
>
> But not one where he would have accepted a snake in his head. This was the
> "important
> point".

Why not? A gunshot wound, for example, would have worked just as well;
after all, Sam sold Jack the snake idea as him helping to recover the intel
the Tok'ra had gathered.

> ... > ....and don't get me started on *missing Daniel's comeback*, ....
> ...
> ... Ha! I would have gladly missed Daniel's comeback. Michael Shanks
> totally
> ... ruined Daniel for me with his I-am-destined-for-greater-things
> attitude;
> ... after his return I could never enjoy Daniel as much as I did before
> because
> ... I started seeing MS, not Daniel.
>
> He surely was a little bitch. Daniel was never my favourite. I had gotten
> over his
> leaving, only for him to come back and then almost leave again... Boring!

Daniel was my favourite in the movie, being an egyptologist etc. That very
much lasted until Shanks had left, but on his return, where TPTB had
obviously gone along with at least some of Shanks' 'suggestions' of how
Daniel's character should develop, he seemed to turn into someone else. Now,
I realise that Daniel had obviously changed and couldn't have stayed the
same person he was at the beginning, given his experiences, but the whole
body building look just didn't ring true to me.
I am sure Danielites loved it though!

> ... > ...and then Jack saving that slave girl from Ba'al...
> ...
> ... You romantic!
>
> She was cute. Pity Jack didn't fall for her...

Like they would have any future together. Anyway, Jack & Sam Forever! <g>

> ... > Ok, I haven't watched
> ... > Stargate in a good while and don't remember all the details, but I
> do
> ... > remember that the
> ... > Tok'ra didn't get out of the situation feeling very proud!
> ...
> ... No, they didn't. Jack must have been ecstatic that his dislike and his
> ... distrust of the Tok'ra was confirmed in this way; I bet he thought it
> was
> ... worth all the pain. <g>
>
> He surely had a point there.

No kidding. What a miserable bunch they were, too.

> ... > BTW, what's the actor who played Ba'al doing now? I like him.
> ...
> ... Here I was going to mark the next sentence as a spoiler but if I did
> that,
> ... you could work out what the spoiler was anyway, so let me just say as
> ... vaguely as I can that you will be happy to hear he will be in an SG-1
> movie.
> ... Which I didn't know until now so I got spoiled because of you. ;-Þ
>
> Don't hate me! ;))

I will endevour not to. I am actually looking forward to it very much since
my favourite character is in it. I am hoping some good soul will leak the
movie in May. <g>

> He
> ... doesn't seem to be very busy with his TV career ATM but take a look
> here for
> ... what he is doing now:
> ...
> ... http://www.cliffsimon.com/
>
> Miam! :)))

I personally do not see what the fuss is about but I understand there are
some of you who think differently. :-)

Eva
--
Join the Stargate SG-1 SETI@home Team
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/team_display.php?teamid=30516

"Ceremonies have killed religions for they provide the masked comforts to
delusionals..."

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:55:52 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
<eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:

... Why not? A gunshot wound, for example, would have worked just as well;
... after all, Sam sold Jack the snake idea as him helping to recover the intel
... the Tok'ra had gathered.

No way! He was a soldier, he had seen worse - a bullet would not have persuaded him to
accept a snake. It had to be something mysterious, beyond our <cough> medicine...

... Daniel was my favourite in the movie, being an egyptologist etc. That very
... much lasted until Shanks had left, but on his return, where TPTB had
... obviously gone along with at least some of Shanks' 'suggestions' of how
... Daniel's character should develop, he seemed to turn into someone else. Now,
... I realise that Daniel had obviously changed and couldn't have stayed the
... same person he was at the beginning, given his experiences, but the whole
... body building look just didn't ring true to me.
... I am sure Danielites loved it though!

I'm not one of them.

... Like they would have any future together. Anyway, Jack & Sam Forever! <g>

It would have put some spice in the bland J&S dish... Bland? Read "bleah!!".

... > He surely had a point there.
...
... No kidding. What a miserable bunch they were, too.
...
... > Don't hate me! ;))
...
... I will endeavour not to. I am actually looking forward to it very much since
... my favourite character is in it. I am hoping some good soul will leak the
... movie in May. <g>

I'm still a wreck from last night's Torchwood. I need a day off. :)

... > He
... > ... doesn't seem to be very busy with his TV career ATM but take a look
... > here for
... > ... what he is doing now:
... > ...
... > ... http://www.cliffsimon.com/
... >
... > Miam! :)))
...
... I personally do not see what the fuss is about but I understand there are
... some of you who think differently. :-)

Good. That's one rival less to fight! :)))))


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
news:nhkev39pgva1buv98teid96iihc4nqdhl7@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:06:55 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> like this:
>
> ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> ... news:tb3cv3p9pkm8r06jibebp8huegiloa8eqp@4ax.com...
> ... > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:48:20 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> ... > spike1@freenet.co.uk arranged
> ... > some electrons, so they looked like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
> ... > ... > ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten
> something?
> ... > ...
> ... > ... > Yes. No.
> ... > ...
> ... > ... She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM
> though.
> ... > ... So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no
> difference at
> ... > all
> ... > ... really...
> ... >
> ... > The butterfly theory? Let's say the children of the people she saved
> (from
> ... > her own illness
> ... > or not, it does not matter. She saved them, point) will accomplish
> ... > something important.
> ... > Like finding another suitable planet once we have destroyed this
> one,
> ... > which won't be long
> ... > now, yadda yadda.
> ...
> ... You are missing the point here. If she had not been revived, nobody
> would
> ... have got sick so there would have been nobody to save. No butterflies
> ... involved since my point was she would have been better off dead. Dead
> = no
> ... body to be found, no illness to be inflicted on others, no saving
> necessary,
> ... status quo remains. The main reason for the episode was for O'Neill to
> get
> ... sick and disappear for a while, since RDA hurt his knee (remember
> ;-) ) and
> ... needed a bit of time off. If you look at his performance in "Frozen",
> he is
> ... a bit more out of it than usual because he was on painkillers.
>
> We would have been deprived of Abyss, and don't get me started on *missing
> Daniel's
> comeback*, and then Jack saving that slave girl from Ba'al... Ok, I
> haven't watched
> Stargate in a good while and don't remember all the details, but I do
> remember that the
> Tok'ra didn't get out of the situation feeling very proud!
>
> BTW, what's the actor who played Ba'al doing now? I like him.

He's in the next SG1 movie.

In article <nhkev39pgva1buv98teid96iihc4nqdhl7@4ax.com>, Magda <> wrote:
>On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:06:55 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
><eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> ... news:tb3cv3p9pkm8r06jibebp8huegiloa8eqp@4ax.com...
> ... > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:48:20 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1,
> ... > spike1@freenet.co.uk arranged
> ... > some electrons, so they looked like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
> ... > ... > ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?
> ... > ...
> ... > ... > Yes. No.
> ... > ...
> ... > ... She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM though.
> ... > ... So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no difference at
> ... > all
> ... > ... really...
> ... >
> ... > The butterfly theory? Let's say the children of the people she saved (from
> ... > her own illness
> ... > or not, it does not matter. She saved them, point) will accomplish
> ... > something important.
> ... > Like finding another suitable planet once we have destroyed this one,
> ... > which won't be long
> ... > now, yadda yadda.
> ...
> ... You are missing the point here. If she had not been revived, nobody would
> ... have got sick so there would have been nobody to save. No butterflies
> ... involved since my point was she would have been better off dead. Dead = no
> ... body to be found, no illness to be inflicted on others, no saving necessary,
> ... status quo remains. The main reason for the episode was for O'Neill to get
> ... sick and disappear for a while, since RDA hurt his knee (remember ;-) ) and
> ... needed a bit of time off. If you look at his performance in "Frozen", he is
> ... a bit more out of it than usual because he was on painkillers.
>
>We would have been deprived of Abyss, and don't get me started on *missing Daniel's
>comeback*, and then Jack saving that slave girl from Ba'al... Ok, I haven't watched
>Stargate in a good while and don't remember all the details, but I do remember that the
>Tok'ra didn't get out of the situation feeling very proud!
>
>BTW, what's the actor who played Ba'al doing now? I like him.

He's appearing at starfest in Denver, Colorado next weekend.

Jill
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++
The colors blend, the edges soften. Swirling and mixing
we are becoming white light.
jill@tuells.org

Magda wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:24:32 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... "Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
> ... news:qqobv39u870hsv5iibf6b1mv10fju733bq@4ax.com...
> ... > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:52:23 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> ... > <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
> ... > like this:
> ... >
> ... > ... > It's the way I'll always remember her.
> ... > ... > As a beautiful, intelligent, caring woman.
> ... > ...
> ... > ...
> ... > ... I know. I was just messing. :-) I really felt sorry for her when her
> ... > ... Ancient mates left her by herself on Earth. It would have been more
> ... > humane
> ... > ... to kill her, if they couldn't have cured her. I know what I would
> ... > have
> ... > ... preferred.
> ... >
> ... > But then she would not have saved a few humans, thousands of years later.
> ...
> ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?
>
> Yes. No.
>

But wasn't she the one carrying the virus so that they caught it off
her in the first place?


--
Jette Goldie
jette@blueyonder.co.uk
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)

spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:
> Magda <hello@keepthis.thankyou> did eloquently scribble:
>> ... Are you referring to "Frozen"? Or have I forgotten something?
>
>> Yes. No.
>
> She was the cause of the thing she saved the few humans FROM though.
> So her being dead vs alive in the 21st century made no difference at all
> really...
>
> Apart from O'niell getting tortured to death by Ba'al of course.
> Absolutely nothing good came of her revival.
>

Well, we got good Jonas moments from the story :-)

--
Jette Goldie
jette@blueyonder.co.uk
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)

In article <65pb7eF2h6ah1U1@mid.individual.net>,
Eva <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>"Magda" <hello@keepthis.thankyou> wrote in message
>news:nroev3lgmj0p250p8j6qrt9i0j0orh75kd@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:48:45 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
>> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they looked
>> like this:
>>
>>
>> ... > We would have been deprived of Abyss, ....
>> ...
>> ... That could have been achieved by other means, they could have written
>> a
>> ... different episode which almost kills Jack.
>>
>> But not one where he would have accepted a snake in his head. This was the
>> "important
>> point".
>
>Why not? A gunshot wound, for example, would have worked just as well;
>after all, Sam sold Jack the snake idea as him helping to recover the intel
>the Tok'ra had gathered.
>
>> ... > ....and don't get me started on *missing Daniel's comeback*, ....
>> ...
>> ... Ha! I would have gladly missed Daniel's comeback. Michael Shanks
>> totally
>> ... ruined Daniel for me with his I-am-destined-for-greater-things
>> attitude;
>> ... after his return I could never enjoy Daniel as much as I did before
>> because
>> ... I started seeing MS, not Daniel.
>>
>> He surely was a little bitch. Daniel was never my favourite. I had gotten
>> over his
>> leaving, only for him to come back and then almost leave again... Boring!
>
>Daniel was my favourite in the movie, being an egyptologist etc. That very
>much lasted until Shanks had left, but on his return, where TPTB had
>obviously gone along with at least some of Shanks' 'suggestions' of how
>Daniel's character should develop, he seemed to turn into someone else. Now,
>I realise that Daniel had obviously changed and couldn't have stayed the
>same person he was at the beginning, given his experiences, but the whole
>body building look just didn't ring true to me.
>I am sure Danielites loved it though!

_I_ didn't and he had always been my favorite character.
I didn't like that Daniel was turning into a
stereotypical macho 'guy' and losing the intellectual professor
piece. I get that it might/could happen as he learned more military
stuff and trained more and so on, but I didn't like it.

Btw, I've met Shanks in real and he a very typical, macho, sports
oriented, stuck on himself guy. I'm not impressed :P

OTOH, I've also met Peter Williams in person (apophis) and he is
SO nice!!! :)
>> ... > ...and then Jack saving that slave girl from Ba'al...
>> ...
>> ... You romantic!
>>
>> She was cute. Pity Jack didn't fall for her...
>
>Like they would have any future together. Anyway, Jack & Sam Forever! <g>

YES!

>> ... > Ok, I haven't watched
>> ... > Stargate in a good while and don't remember all the details, but I
>> do
>> ... > remember that the
>> ... > Tok'ra didn't get out of the situation feeling very proud!
>> ...
>> ... No, they didn't. Jack must have been ecstatic that his dislike and his
>> ... distrust of the Tok'ra was confirmed in this way; I bet he thought it
>> was
>> ... worth all the pain. <g>
>>
>> He surely had a point there.
>
>No kidding. What a miserable bunch they were, too.
>
>> ... > BTW, what's the actor who played Ba'al doing now? I like him.
>> ...
>> ... Here I was going to mark the next sentence as a spoiler but if I did
>> that,
>> ... you could work out what the spoiler was anyway, so let me just say as
>> ... vaguely as I can that you will be happy to hear he will be in an SG-1
>> movie.
>> ... Which I didn't know until now so I got spoiled because of you. ;-Þ
>>
>> Don't hate me! ;))
>
>I will endevour not to. I am actually looking forward to it very much since
>my favourite character is in it. I am hoping some good soul will leak the
>movie in May. <g>
>
>> He
>> ... doesn't seem to be very busy with his TV career ATM but take a look
>> here for
>> ... what he is doing now:
>> ...
>> ... http://www.cliffsimon.com/
>>
>> Miam! :)))
>
>I personally do not see what the fuss is about but I understand there are
>some of you who think differently. :-)
>
>Eva

Ba'al was 'ok'. Apophis was _much_ better imo!

Jill
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++
The colors blend, the edges soften. Swirling and mixing
we are becoming white light.
jill@tuells.org

On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:12:36 -0500, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, jill@tuells.org (jill)
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:


...
... Ba'al was 'ok'. Apophis was _much_ better imo!
...
... Jill

I'm *not* fighting you over Apophis, and never shall! ;)


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

jill wrote:
>
> Ba'al was 'ok'. Apophis was _much_ better imo!
>

Agreed. Apophis actually had charisma. Ba'al was like a politician.
And Anubis was a weak Palpatine rip-off.

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail

In article <47f3bd01$0$14343$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, liam@valentijn.nu
says...
> Eva wrote:
> > "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote in message
> > news:47f2a0ba$0$14360$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> >> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> >>> In article <47f27239$0$14354$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
> >>> "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Magda wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:03:31 +0100, in alt.tv.stargate-sg1, "Eva"
> >>>>> <eva1removethis@ukonline.co.uk> arranged some electrons, so they
> >>>>> looked like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> <snip>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ... > ... > ... > ... Ja vam taky rozumim!
> >>>>> ... > ... > ...
> >>>>> ... > ... > ... Something about tacky roses?
> >>>>> ... > ... > ... I don't even recognize the language.
> >>>>> ... > ... >
> >>>>> ... > ... > Croat?
> >>>>> ... > ...
> >>>>> ... > ...
> >>>>> ... > ... Czech. Really, Magda! <g>
> >>>>> ... >
> >>>>> ... > Sorry - but I was not putting you on the other side of the
> >>>>> planet, was I? ... > ;))
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>> ... LOL, that's not making it any better. <g>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No, but it could have been much worse. If I was a mercan, I would
> >>>>> say you were from somewhere in the middle of the Pacific... or
> >>>>> Antarctica.
> >>>>
> >>>> The middle of the Pacific... Okay. Can happen.
> >>>> But Antarctica... That would mean Eva is one of the Ancients!
> >>>
> >>> Well, she's no spring chicken, but I think that was a bit harsh.
> >
> > LOL!!!
> >
> >> Would you call something like this harsh?
> >>
> >> http://www.freewebs.com/fsm2k4/ayiana.jpg
> >
> > You mean a silent killing machine? ;-)
> >
>
> Ayiana was a healing machine.

But what a machine.

Pete B wrote:
> In article <47f3bd01$0$14343$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
> liam@valentijn.nu says...

<snip>

>>
>> Ayiana was a healing machine.
>
> But what a machine.

Very easy to look at. :-)

--
www.woutervalentijn.net

www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html

liam=mail